Suppr超能文献

影响新冠病毒诊断检测干预措施采用情况的因素:一项定性综述

Factors influencing uptake of diagnostic test interventions for SARS-CoV-2: A qualitative review.

作者信息

Nwachuku Nuria S, Arikpo Dachi I, Agbor Ugo J, Onyenemerem Peter N, Ochodo Eleanor A, Smith Helen, Meremikwu Martin

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Faculty of Allied Medical Sciences, University of Calabar, Calabar, Nigeria.

Cochrane Nigeria, Institute of Tropical Diseases Research and Prevention, University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar, Nigeria.

出版信息

J Public Health Afr. 2025 Apr 28;16(2):619. doi: 10.4102/jphia.v16i2.619. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diagnostic tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) may be performed based on symptomatic presentation or for screening of asymptomatic persons. Testing can limit spread by enabling rapid identification of cases leading to containment measures. However, views regarding diagnostic test as a containment intervention vary across different settings.

AIM

To synthesise the findings of qualitative studies on the perceptions and factors influencing the uptake of diagnostic test interventions for SARS-CoV-2.

SETTING

Healthcare facilities, care homes, communities including households.

METHOD

We searched MEDLINE database and the (WHO) SARS-CoV-2 Research database from 01 January 2020 to 06 September 2022. Qualitative data were synthesised thematically while data for barriers and facilitators were synthesised using the SURE framework. The GRADE-CERQual approach was used to assess the confidence in each review finding, while the ENTREQ checklist was used to report the QES. The quality of included studies was assessed with the CASP tool.

RESULTS

Twenty two studies were included for QES. Two were conducted in the health facility setting, 2 in care homes, and 18 in the community. Twenty of the studies came from high-income countries, 2 from low- and middle-income countries. In all, 13 analytical and 31 descriptive themes of low to moderate quality evidence emerged; mainly around fear of contracting COVID-19, test procedure and socio-economic implications of a positive test result.

CONCLUSION

Low to moderate quality evidence of barriers to uptake of diagnostic test were largely due to misconceptions about the interventions.

CONTRIBUTION

Sensitising and engaging communities and stakeholders in the healthcare system, will help mitigate the fear barrier and enhance policy coordination.

摘要

背景

严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)诊断检测可基于症状表现进行,也可用于无症状者的筛查。检测能够通过快速识别病例并采取隔离措施来限制病毒传播。然而,在不同环境中,对于将诊断检测作为一种隔离干预措施的看法各不相同。

目的

综合关于严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2诊断检测干预措施的认知及影响其采用因素的定性研究结果。

设置

医疗机构、疗养院、包括家庭在内的社区。

方法

我们检索了2020年1月1日至2022年9月6日的MEDLINE数据库和世界卫生组织(WHO)的SARS-CoV-2研究数据库。定性数据按主题进行综合分析,而关于障碍和促进因素的数据则使用SURE框架进行综合分析。采用GRADE-CERQual方法评估每项综述结果的可信度,同时使用ENTREQ清单报告定性证据综合分析。纳入研究的质量用CASP工具进行评估。

结果

22项研究纳入定性证据综合分析。2项在医疗机构环境中开展,2项在疗养院,18项在社区。其中20项研究来自高收入国家,2项来自低收入和中等收入国家。总共出现了13个分析性主题和31个描述性主题,证据质量低至中等;主要围绕对感染2019冠状病毒病的恐惧、检测程序以及检测结果呈阳性的社会经济影响。

结论

诊断检测采用障碍的证据质量低至中等,主要是由于对这些干预措施存在误解。

贡献

提高社区和医疗系统利益相关者的认识并让他们参与进来,将有助于消除恐惧障碍并加强政策协调。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d46/12067561/cc5bada2af76/JPHIA-16-619-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验