Roberts Emily K, Gu Tian, Wagner Abram L, Mukherjee Bhramar, Fritsche Lars G
Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Center for Precision Health Data Science, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
AJPM Focus. 2022 Sep;1(1):100015. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100015. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
Observational studies of COVID-19 vaccines' effectiveness can provide crucial information regarding the strength and durability of protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and whether the protective response varies across different patient subpopulations and in the context of different SARS-CoV-2 variants.
We used a test-negative study design to assess vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 resulting in hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or death using electronic health records data of 170,741 adults who had been tested for COVID-19 at the University of Michigan Medical Center between January 1 and December 31, 2021. We estimated vaccine effectiveness by comparing the odds of vaccination between cases and controls during each 2021 calendar quarter and stratified all outcomes by vaccine type, patient demographic and clinical characteristics, and booster status.
Unvaccinated individuals had more than double the rate of infections (12.1% vs 4.7%) and >3 times the rate of severe COVID-19 outcomes (1.4% vs 0.4%) than vaccinated individuals. COVID-19 vaccines were 62.1% (95% CI=60.3, 63.8) effective against a new infection, with protection waning in the last 2 quarters of 2021. The vaccine effectiveness against severe disease overall was 73.7% (95% CI=69.6, 77.3) and remained high throughout 2021. Data from the last quarter of 2021 indicated that adding a booster dose augmented effectiveness against infection up to 87.3% (95% CI=85.0, 89.2) and against severe outcomes up to 94.0% (95% CI=89.5, 96.6). Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines showed comparable performance when controlling for vaccination timing. Vaccine effectiveness was greater in more socioeconomically affluent areas and among healthcare workers; otherwise, we did not detect any significant modification of vaccine effectiveness by covariates, including gender, race, and SES.
COVID-19 vaccines were highly protective against infection and severe COVID-19 resulting in hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, or death. Administration of a booster dose significantly increased vaccine effectiveness against both outcomes. Ongoing surveillance is required to assess the durability of these findings.
对新冠病毒疫苗有效性的观察性研究可以提供关键信息,涉及针对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染的保护强度和持久性,以及保护反应在不同患者亚群中以及在不同SARS-CoV-2变体背景下是否存在差异。
我们采用检测阴性研究设计,利用2021年1月1日至12月31日期间在密歇根大学医学中心接受新冠病毒检测的170,741名成年人的电子健康记录数据,评估疫苗针对SARS-CoV-2感染以及导致住院、重症监护病房收治或死亡的重症新冠的有效性。我们通过比较2021年每个日历季度病例组和对照组的接种几率来估计疫苗有效性,并按疫苗类型、患者人口统计学和临床特征以及加强针接种状态对所有结果进行分层。
未接种疫苗的个体感染率(12.1%对4.7%)是接种疫苗个体的两倍多,重症新冠结果发生率(1.4%对0.4%)是接种疫苗个体的3倍多。新冠病毒疫苗对新感染的有效性为62.1%(95%置信区间=60.3, 63.8),在2021年最后两个季度保护作用减弱。疫苗对重症疾病的总体有效性为73.7%(95%置信区间=69.6, 77.3),在2021年全年都保持较高水平。2021年最后一个季度的数据表明,接种一剂加强针可将针对感染的有效性提高至87.3%(95%置信区间=85.0, 89.2),针对重症结果的有效性提高至94.0%(95%置信区间=89.5, 96.6)。在控制接种时间的情况下,辉瑞-生物科技公司和莫德纳公司的疫苗表现相当。在社会经济状况更富裕的地区以及医护人员中,疫苗有效性更高;否则,我们未检测到包括性别、种族和社会经济地位在内的协变量对疫苗有效性有任何显著影响。
新冠病毒疫苗对感染以及导致住院、重症监护病房收治或死亡的重症新冠具有高度保护作用。接种一剂加强针显著提高了疫苗对这两种结果的有效性。需要持续监测以评估这些发现的持久性。