• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于踝关节骨折的YouTube视频的质量、可吸收性及教育价值评估。

Assessment of quality, absorbability, and educational value of YouTube videos regarding ankle fractures.

作者信息

Stumpe Tanner R, Graf Austin M, Melton Christopher D, Devarakonda Aditya K, Steflik Michael J, Blair James A, Parada Stephen A, Davis Jana M

机构信息

Medical College of Georgia at Augusta University, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, 1120 15 Street, Augusta, GA, 30912, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop. 2023 Mar 7;38:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.016. eCollection 2023 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.016
PMID:36942091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10023895/
Abstract

AIMS & OBJECTIVES: YouTube is a non-peer-reviewed platform with a large library of healthcare-related videos which attempt to provide educational content. The goal of this study is to analyze the quality, absorbability, and educational content of videos available to patients on YouTube regarding ankle fractures.

MATERIALS & METHODS: On May 31, 2022, over 550 videos populated the initial search of "ankle fracture" within YouTube's platform. The first 100 videos were reviewed, and 62 videos were included in the final analysis. Video characteristics were recorded and evaluated. Videos were assessed using three objective scoring systems: (1) the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, (2) the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for audio and visual materials (PEMAT), and (3) the novel Ankle Fracture Content Score (AFCS).

RESULTS

Each scoring system had high internal consistency and interrater reliability. The mean JAMA, PEMAT understandability, PEMAT actionability, and AFCS were 2.92, 61.85%, 16.38%, and 4.67, respectively. No association was seen between video popularity metrics and quality of information. The understandability of the patient-targeted videos was greater than those targeted at healthcare professionals ( = 0.049).

CONCLUSION

The information regarding ankle fractures available on YouTube for patient education is poor with no correlation between quality and popularity. This study illustrates the need for future collaboration between YouTube and trusted medical societies to provide patients with the highest quality information.

摘要

目的与目标

YouTube是一个未经同行评审的平台,拥有大量与医疗保健相关的视频库,旨在提供教育内容。本研究的目的是分析YouTube上可供患者观看的有关踝关节骨折视频的质量、可吸收性和教育内容。

材料与方法

2022年5月31日,在YouTube平台上对“踝关节骨折”进行初步搜索,出现了550多个视频。对前100个视频进行了审查,最终分析纳入了62个视频。记录并评估了视频特征。使用三种客观评分系统对视频进行评估:(1)美国医学会(JAMA)基准标准,(2)视听材料患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT),以及(3)新的踝关节骨折内容评分(AFCS)。

结果

每个评分系统都具有较高的内部一致性和评分者间信度。JAMA、PEMAT可理解性、PEMAT可操作性和AFCS的平均值分别为2.92、61.85%、16.38%和4.67。视频受欢迎程度指标与信息质量之间没有关联。针对患者的视频的可理解性高于针对医疗保健专业人员的视频(P = 0.049)。

结论

YouTube上可供患者教育使用的有关踝关节骨折的信息质量较差,质量与受欢迎程度之间没有相关性。本研究表明,YouTube与可信医学协会未来需要开展合作,为患者提供最高质量的信息。

相似文献

1
Assessment of quality, absorbability, and educational value of YouTube videos regarding ankle fractures.关于踝关节骨折的YouTube视频的质量、可吸收性及教育价值评估。
J Orthop. 2023 Mar 7;38:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2023.02.016. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Assessing the Quality and Clarity of YouTube Videos as an Informational Source for Ankle Fractures: A Study of the Turkish Population.评估YouTube视频作为踝关节骨折信息来源的质量和清晰度:一项针对土耳其人群的研究。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 10;16(3):e55891. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55891. eCollection 2024 Mar.
3
YouTube Videos Lack Efficacy as a Patient Education Tool for Rehabilitation and Return to Play Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.YouTube视频作为内侧髌股韧带重建术后康复及恢复运动的患者教育工具缺乏疗效。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022 May 31;4(3):e1111-e1118. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2022.03.010. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Understandability and Actionability of Available Video Information on YouTube Regarding Hemophilia: A Cross-Sectional Study.YouTube上关于血友病的现有视频信息的可理解性与可操作性:一项横断面研究
Cureus. 2022 Oct 3;14(10):e29866. doi: 10.7759/cureus.29866. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Quality Assessment of TikTok as a Source of Information About Mitral Valve Regurgitation in China: Cross-Sectional Study.中国关于二尖瓣反流的信息来源——TikTok 质量评估:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Aug 20;26:e55403. doi: 10.2196/55403.
6
Evaluating the Quality of Overactive Bladder Patient Education Material on YouTube: A Pilot Study Using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool.评估 YouTube 上过度活跃膀胱患者教育材料的质量:使用患者教育材料评估工具的初步研究。
Urology. 2020 Nov;145:90-93. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Aug 20.
7
A Double-Edged Sword: Quality and Credibility of Colon Cancer Screening Content on YouTube.一把双刃剑:YouTube上结肠癌筛查内容的质量与可信度
Cureus. 2024 Feb 26;16(2):e54929. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54929. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
Is YouTube a Sufficient and Reliable Source to Inform Patients About Cardiac Rehabilitation?: A Cross-sectional Study.YouTube 是否足以成为向患者提供心脏康复信息的可靠来源?一项横断面研究。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2024 Jul 1;44(4):239-247. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000864. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
9
Gynecomastia Surgery Patient Education: An Information Quality Assessment of YouTube Videos.男性乳房发育症手术患者教育:对 YouTube 视频信息质量的评估。
Ann Plast Surg. 2024 May 1;92(5):491-498. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003813. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
10
Assessment of the Quality, Understandability, and Reliability of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Basal Cell Carcinoma: Web-Based Analysis.评估YouTube视频作为基底细胞癌信息来源的质量、易懂性和可靠性:基于网络的分析
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Mar 11;8(1):e29581. doi: 10.2196/29581.

引用本文的文献

1
Single-Position Lumbar Fusion Online Videos for Patient Education: Understandability, Reliability, and Quality.用于患者教育的单节段腰椎融合在线视频:可理解性、可靠性和质量
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Aug 19;9(8). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00275. eCollection 2025 Aug 1.
2
Evaluating the Effect of Video Source and Other Video Characteristics on the Quality, Reliability, Actionability, and Understandability of Videos on Acromioclavicular Joint Repair.评估视频来源及其他视频特征对肩锁关节修复视频的质量、可靠性、可操作性和可理解性的影响。
Cureus. 2025 Feb 4;17(2):e78518. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78518. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Better outcomes using suture button compared to screw fixation in talofibular syndesmotic injuries of the ankle: a level I evidence-based meta-analysis.与螺钉固定相比,使用缝合扣在距腓联合损伤中的应用效果更好:一项基于 I 级证据的荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Jun;144(6):2641-2653. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05354-x. Epub 2024 May 13.
4
Assessing the Quality and Clarity of YouTube Videos as an Informational Source for Ankle Fractures: A Study of the Turkish Population.评估YouTube视频作为踝关节骨折信息来源的质量和清晰度:一项针对土耳其人群的研究。
Cureus. 2024 Mar 10;16(3):e55891. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55891. eCollection 2024 Mar.
5
Addressing the Need for a Better Understanding of Foot and Ankle Pathology Relevant to the Adolescent Athlete.满足更好地理解与青少年运动员相关的足踝病理学需求。
Children (Basel). 2023 Aug 3;10(8):1342. doi: 10.3390/children10081342.

本文引用的文献

1
YouTube as a source of patient education information for elbow ulnar collateral ligament injuries: a quality control content analysis.YouTube作为肘尺侧副韧带损伤患者教育信息来源的质量控制内容分析
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2022 Jun;25(2):145-153. doi: 10.5397/cise.2021.00717. Epub 2022 May 23.
2
Is YouTube a reliable source of health-related information? A systematic review.YouTube 是健康相关信息的可靠来源吗?一项系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 May 19;22(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03446-z.
3
Looking for cystoscopy on YouTube: Are videos a reliable information tool for internet users?在 YouTube 上查找膀胱镜检查:视频是否为互联网用户的可靠信息工具?
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2022 Mar 29;94(1):57-61. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2022.1.57.
4
Assessment of Videos on YouTubeTM about Nasopharyngeal Cancer in Terms of Accuracy, Reliability and Understandability.评估 YouTubeTM 上关于鼻咽癌的视频在准确性、可靠性和可理解性方面的表现。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Mar 1;23(3):1023-1029. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.3.1023.
5
"YouTube™ as a source of information on placenta accreta: A quality analysis".YouTube™作为凶险性前置胎盘信息来源的质量分析
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 May;272:82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.03.015. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
6
Testicular pain and youtube™: are uploaded videos a reliable source to get information?睾丸疼痛与YouTube™:上传的视频是获取信息的可靠来源吗?
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Mar;35(2):140-146. doi: 10.1038/s41443-022-00536-w. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
7
Cross-sectional and comparative analysis of videos on erectile dysfunction treatment on YouTube and TikTok.YouTube 和 TikTok 上治疗勃起功能障碍视频的横断面和对比分析。
Andrologia. 2022 Jun;54(5):e14392. doi: 10.1111/and.14392. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
8
Quality and Content Analysis of Carpal Tunnel Videos on YouTube.YouTube上腕管综合征视频的质量与内容分析
Indian J Orthop. 2021 May 25;56(1):73-78. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00430-5. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Assessing information on YouTube™ as a quality source for the treatment of varicoceles.评估YouTube™上关于精索静脉曲张治疗的信息作为优质信息来源的情况。
Indian J Urol. 2021 Oct-Dec;37(4):339-344. doi: 10.4103/iju.iju_201_21. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
10
Identifying Credible Sources of Health Information in Social Media: Principles and Attributes.识别社交媒体中健康信息的可靠来源:原则与属性。
NAM Perspect. 2021 Jul 16;2021. doi: 10.31478/202107a. eCollection 2021.