Massachusetts General Hospital, Division of Infectious Diseases, Boston, MA, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Medical Practice Evaluation Center, Boston, MA, USA.
AIDS Care. 2023 Dec;35(12):2016-2023. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2023.2189224. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
Characterizing spatial distribution of HIV outcomes is vital for targeting interventions to areas most at risk. We performed spatial analysis to identify geographic clusters and factors associated with mortality in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. We utilized Sizanani trial (NCT01188941) data, which enrolled participants August 2010-January 2013 and obtained vital status at 5.8 (IQR 5.0-6.4) years of follow-up. We mapped geocoded addresses to 2011 Census-defined small area layer (SAL) centroids, used Kulldorff's spatial scan statistic to identify mortality clusters, and compared socio-demographic factors for SALs within and outside mortality clusters. We assigned 1,143 participants living with HIV to 677 SALs. One lower mortality cluster (n = 90, RR = 0.23, = 0.022) was identified near a hospital outside Durban. SALs in the cluster were younger (24y vs 25y, < 0.001); had fewer bedrooms/household (3 vs 4, < 0.001); had more females (52% vs 51%, = 0.013) and residents with no schooling past age 20 (4% vs 3%, < 0.001) or no education at all (4% vs 3%, < 0.001); had fewer residents with income >3,200 ZAR/month (5% vs 9%, < 0.001); and had reduced access to piped water ( < 0.001), refuse disposal ( < 0.001), and toilets ( < 0.001). Targeted interventions may improve outcomes in areas with similar characteristics.
描述 HIV 结局的空间分布对于将干预措施针对风险最高的地区至关重要。我们进行了空间分析,以确定南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的地理聚集区和与死亡率相关的因素。我们利用了 Sizanani 试验(NCT01188941)的数据,该试验于 2010 年 8 月至 2013 年 1 月招募参与者,并在随访 5.8 年(IQR 5.0-6.4)时获得了生存状态。我们将地理编码的地址映射到 2011 年人口普查定义的小区域层(SAL)质心,使用 Kulldorff 的空间扫描统计数据来识别死亡率聚集区,并比较聚集区内外 SAL 的社会人口统计学因素。我们将 1143 名 HIV 感染者分配到 677 个 SAL 中。在德班郊外的一家医院附近发现了一个死亡率较低的聚集区(n=90,RR=0.23,=0.022)。聚集区内的 SAL 年龄较小(24 岁 vs 25 岁, < 0.001);卧室/家庭数量较少(3 间 vs 4 间, < 0.001);女性较多(52% vs 51%,=0.013),20 岁以后没有受过学校教育的居民(4% vs 3%, < 0.001)或没有接受过任何教育的居民(4% vs 3%, < 0.001);收入超过 3200 南非兰特/月的居民比例较低(5% vs 9%, < 0.001);获得管道供水( < 0.001)、垃圾处理( < 0.001)和厕所( < 0.001)的机会较少。有针对性的干预措施可能会改善具有类似特征地区的结局。