Dental School, Inga University Center, Rod. PR 317, 6114 Industrial Park 200, Maringá, State of Paraná, 87035-510, Brazil.
Dental School, UEM, Maringá State University, Colombo Av., 5790, Zone 7, Maringá, State of Paraná, 87020-900, Brazil.
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 21;13(1):4589. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31332-1.
To compare the attractiveness of lips with different volumes after filling in the view of laypersons, dentists, and specialists. The sample comprised close-up frontal and lateral photographs of the lips of 16 women who underwent lip filling procedure with hyaluronic acid and was divided into 2 groups. Group 1: eight women with thinner lips at pretreatment. Group 2: eight female patients with thicker lips at pretreatment. Photographs from before and 10 days after lip filling were used to assess attractiveness randomly displayed in a Google Forms questionnaire and then sent via a messaging app to the evaluators. The evaluators' groups were general dentists, dentists with degrees in facial aesthetics, and laypersons. The attractiveness was evaluated with scores from 0 to 10 (0: least attractive and 10 the greatest). T-tests were used for the statistical comparisons. The group with thinner lips showed significantly improved attractiveness after filling. The group with thicker lips showed a worsening attractiveness after filling. The group with thicker lips had significantly higher attractiveness scores than those with thinner lips. There was no significant difference in the preference between men and women. The group of laypersons was more rigorous, giving significantly lower lip attractiveness scores. Thinner lips showed a significant improvement in attractiveness after filling. Thicker lips showed a worsening of the attractiveness score after filling. Before and after filling, thicker lips had significantly higher attractiveness scores than thinner lips.Clinical relevance: The amount of fillers applied to each patient must be individually evaluated.
比较填充前后不同唇容量在非专业人士、牙医和专家眼中的吸引力。该样本包括 16 名接受过透明质酸唇部填充的女性的唇部特写正面和侧面照片,并分为两组。第 1 组:8 名治疗前嘴唇较薄的女性。第 2 组:8 名治疗前嘴唇较厚的女性。使用填充前后的照片,通过 Google 表单问卷对吸引力进行随机评估,并通过消息应用程序发送给评估者。评估者分为普通牙医、面部美学学位牙医和非专业人士。用 0 到 10(0:最不吸引人,10:最吸引人)的分数来评估吸引力。使用 t 检验进行统计学比较。唇较薄的组在填充后吸引力明显提高。唇较厚的组在填充后吸引力下降。唇较厚的组的吸引力评分明显高于唇较薄的组。男性和女性之间的偏好没有显著差异。非专业人士组更严格,唇部吸引力评分明显较低。填充后,薄唇的吸引力明显提高。填充后,厚唇的吸引力评分下降。填充前后,厚唇的吸引力评分明显高于薄唇。临床意义:必须单独评估每个患者应用的填充物量。