Suppr超能文献

回顾过去:自传访谈的心理计量学评估。

Taking stock of the past: A psychometric evaluation of the Autobiographical Interview.

机构信息

Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, Montréal Neurological Institute, McGill University, Montréal, QC, H3A 2B4, Canada.

Concordia University, Montréal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2024 Feb;56(2):1002-1038. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02080-x. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

Abstract

Autobiographical memory (AM) involves a rich phenomenological re-experiencing of a spatio-temporal event from the past, which is challenging to objectively quantify. The Autobiographical Interview (AI; Levine et al. Psychology and Aging, 17(4), 677-689, 2002) is a manualized performance-based assessment designed to quantify episodic (internal) and semantic (external) features of recalled and verbally conveyed prior experiences. The AI has been widely adopted, yet has not undergone a comprehensive psychometric validation. We investigated the reliability, validity, association to individual differences measures, and factor structure in healthy younger and older adults (N = 352). Evidence for the AI's reliability was strong: the subjective scoring protocol showed high inter-rater reliability and previously identified age effects were replicated. Internal consistency across timepoints was robust, suggesting stability in recollection. Central to our validation, internal AI scores were positively correlated with standard, performance-based measures of episodic memory, demonstrating convergent validity. The two-factor structure for the AI was not well supported by confirmatory factor analysis. Adjusting internal and external detail scores for the number of words spoken (detail density) improved trait estimation of AM performance. Overall, the AI demonstrated sound psychometric properties for inquiry into the qualities of autobiographical remembering.

摘要

自传体记忆(AM)涉及对过去时空事件的丰富现象学再体验,这很难客观地量化。自传体访谈(AI;Levine 等人,《心理学与衰老》,17(4),677-689,2002)是一种基于表现的标准化评估,旨在量化回忆和口头传达的先前经验的情节(内部)和语义(外部)特征。AI 已被广泛采用,但尚未经过全面的心理计量学验证。我们在健康的年轻和老年成年人(N=352)中研究了可靠性、有效性、与个体差异测量的关联以及因素结构。AI 的可靠性证据很强:主观评分方案表现出高的评分者间可靠性,并且复制了先前确定的年龄效应。跨时间点的内部一致性很强,表明回忆的稳定性。我们验证的核心是,内部 AI 分数与基于表现的情节记忆标准测量呈正相关,表现出收敛有效性。AI 的两因素结构不能通过验证性因素分析得到很好的支持。根据所说的单词数量(详细密度)调整内部和外部详细分数,提高了 AM 表现的特质估计。总的来说,AI 为自传体记忆质量的探究提供了可靠的心理计量学特性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验