• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神病人的免责

Exoneration of the mentally ill.

作者信息

Fields L

机构信息

Dundee University.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1987 Dec;13(4):201-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.13.4.201.

DOI:10.1136/jme.13.4.201
PMID:3694641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1375498/
Abstract

Mental illness may be manifested in the impairment of understanding or of volitional control. Impairment of understanding may be manifested in delusions. Impairment of volitional control is shown when a person is unable to act in accordance with good reasons that he himself accepts. In order for an impairment of understanding or of self-control to exculpate, the offence must be causally connected with the impairment in question. The rationale of exculpation in general, which applies also to the case of mental illness, is that the offence does not indicate a morally bad attitude in the offender. A consequence of this rationale is that Kenny is wrong to hold that no injustice would result from the elimination of the legal defence of diminished responsibility.

摘要

精神疾病可能表现为认知或意志控制的损害。认知损害可能表现为妄想。当一个人无法按照自己认可的合理理由行事时,就表明存在意志控制损害。为了使认知或自我控制的损害成为免责理由,犯罪行为必须与相关损害存在因果联系。一般免责的基本原理(也适用于精神疾病的情况)是,犯罪行为并未表明犯罪者存在道德上的不良态度。这一基本原理的一个结果是,肯尼认为取消减轻责任的法律抗辩不会导致不公正的观点是错误的。

相似文献

1
Exoneration of the mentally ill.精神病人的免责
J Med Ethics. 1987 Dec;13(4):201-5. doi: 10.1136/jme.13.4.201.
2
Exoneration of the mentally ill.免除精神疾病患者的责任
J Med Ethics. 1987 Dec;13(4):206-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.13.4.206.
3
The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.精神错乱辩护:废除该辩护的影响未得到道德共识的支持。
Am J Law Med. 1984 Winter;9(4):471-500.
4
The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Part II: A systematic analysis of exculpatory delusions.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1989;17(1):61-7.
5
Mental illness and responsibility.
Bull Menninger Clin. 1975 Jul;39(4):308-28.
6
Justifications for the insanity defence in Great Britain and the United States: the conflicting rationales of morality and compassion.英国和美国精神错乱辩护的理由:道德与同情的相互冲突的基本原理。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1981;9(2):100-15.
7
[Treatment of offenders with mental disorders: focusing on prison psychiatry].[对患有精神障碍的罪犯的治疗:聚焦监狱精神病学]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2011;113(5):458-67.
8
The reliability and validity of the rating scale of criminal responsibility for mentally disordered offenders.精神障碍患者刑事责任评定量表的信度和效度。
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Mar;236:146-50. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.018. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
9
Scientific thought and the boundary of insanity and criminal responsibility.科学思维与精神错乱及刑事责任的界限
Psychol Med. 1980 Feb;10(1):15-23. doi: 10.1017/s003329170003957x.
10
Competency to stand trial: a conceptual model for its proper assessment.受审能力:对其进行恰当评估的概念模型。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1987;15(1):85-94.

本文引用的文献

1
Anomalies of Section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957.1957年《杀人法》第2节的异常情况。
J Med Ethics. 1986 Mar;12(1):24-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.12.1.24.