Woolcock Institute for Medical Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Environ Health Perspect. 2023 Mar;131(3):37012. doi: 10.1289/EHP10757. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
Large electricity-generating wind turbines emit both audible sound and inaudible infrasound at very low frequencies that are outside of the normal human range of hearing. Sufferers of wind turbine syndrome (WTS) have attributed their ill-health and particularly their sleep disturbance to the signature pattern of infrasound. Critics have argued that these symptoms are psychological in origin and are attributable to nocebo effects.
We aimed to test the effects of 72 h of infrasound (1.6-20 Hz at a sound level of dB pk re , simulating a wind turbine infrasound signature) exposure on human physiology, particularly sleep.
We conducted a randomized double-blind triple-arm crossover laboratory-based study of 72 h exposure with a washout conducted in a noise-insulated sleep laboratory in the style of a studio apartment. The exposures were infrasound ( dB pk), sham infrasound (same speakers not generating infrasound), and traffic noise exposure [active control; at a sound pressure level of 40-50 dB and 70 dB transient maxima, night (2200 to 0700 hours)]. The following physiological and psychological measures and systems were tested for their sensitivity to infrasound: wake after sleep onset (WASO; primary outcome) and other measures of sleep physiology, wake electroencephalography, WTS symptoms, cardiovascular physiology, and neurobehavioral performance.
We randomized 37 noise-sensitive but otherwise healthy adults (18-72 years of age; 51% female) into the study before a COVID19-related public health order forced the study to close. WASO was not affected by infrasound compared with sham infrasound ( min; 95% CI: , 3.88, ) but was worsened by the active control traffic exposure compared with sham by 6.07 min (95% CI: 0.75, 11.39, ). Infrasound did not worsen any subjective or objective measures used.
Our findings did not support the idea that infrasound causes WTS. High level, but inaudible, infrasound did not appear to perturb any physiological or psychological measure tested in these study participants. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10757.
大型风力涡轮机能发出人耳听不到的极低频率的可听声音和次声。患有风力涡轮机综合征(WTS)的患者将其健康问题,特别是睡眠障碍归因于次声的特征模式。批评者认为,这些症状是心理起源的,归因于反安慰剂效应。
我们旨在测试 72 小时次声(1.6-20 Hz,声压级为 dB pk re ,模拟风力涡轮机次声特征)暴露对人体生理学,特别是睡眠的影响。
我们在隔音睡眠实验室中进行了一项为期 72 小时的随机双盲三臂交叉实验室研究,采用类似于一室公寓的方式进行洗脱。暴露于次声(dB pk )、假次声(相同扬声器不产生次声)和交通噪声暴露[主动对照;声压级为 40-50 dB 和 70 dB 瞬态最大值,夜间(2200 至 0700 小时)]。测试了以下生理和心理测量和系统对次声的敏感性:睡眠后觉醒(WASO;主要结局)和其他睡眠生理学测量、觉醒脑电图、WTS 症状、心血管生理学和神经行为表现。
在 COVID19 相关公共卫生命令迫使研究关闭之前,我们随机招募了 37 名对噪声敏感但其他方面健康的成年人(18-72 岁;51%为女性)进入研究。与假次声相比,WASO 不受次声影响( min;95%CI: , 3.88, ),但与假次声相比,主动对照交通暴露使 WASO 增加 6.07 min(95%CI: 0.75, 11.39, )。次声并未加重任何主观或客观测量。
我们的研究结果不支持次声会引起 WTS 的观点。在这些研究参与者中,高水平但听不到的次声似乎没有扰乱任何生理或心理测量。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP10757.