Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Can J Public Health. 2023 Aug;114(4):593-612. doi: 10.17269/s41997-023-00745-w. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
Nutrition risk is a key component of frailty and screening, and treatment of nutrition risk is part of frailty management. This study identified the determinants of a 3-year decline in nutrition risk (measured by SCREEN-8) for older adults stratified by risk status at baseline.
Secondary data analysis of the comprehensive cohort sample of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA) (n = 5031) with complete data for covariates at baseline and 3-year follow-up. Using a conceptual model to define covariates, determinants of a change in nutrition risk score as measured by SCREEN-8 (lower score indicates greater risk) were identified for those not at risk at baseline and those at high risk at baseline using multivariable regression.
Models stratified by baseline nutrition risk were significant. Notable factors associated with a decrease in SCREEN-8 for those not at risk at baseline were mental health diagnoses (- 0.83; CI [- 1.44, -0.22]), living alone at follow-up (- 1.98; CI [- 3.40, -0.56]), and lack of dental care at both timepoints (- 0.91; CI [- 1.62, -0.20]) and at follow-up only (- 1.32; CI [- 2.45, -0.19]). For those at high nutrition risk at baseline, decline in activities of daily living (- 2.56; CI [- 4.36, -0.77]) and low chair-rise scores (- 1.98; CI [- 3.33, - 0.63]) were associated with lower SCREEN-8 scores at follow-up.
Determinants of change in SCREEN-8 scores are different for those with no risk and those who are already at high risk, suggesting targeted approaches are needed for screening and treatment of nutrition risk in primary care.
营养风险是衰弱的关键组成部分,筛查和治疗营养风险是衰弱管理的一部分。本研究确定了基线时处于不同风险状态的老年人在 3 年内 SCREEN-8(营养风险评估工具)评分下降的决定因素。
对加拿大老龄化纵向研究(CLSA)的综合队列样本进行二次数据分析(n=5031),这些样本在基线和 3 年随访时具有完整的协变量数据。使用概念模型来定义协变量,确定基线时无风险和基线时高风险的人群 SCREEN-8 评分变化的决定因素(评分越低表示风险越高),并使用多变量回归进行分析。
按基线营养风险分层的模型具有统计学意义。与基线时无风险的人群 SCREEN-8 评分下降相关的显著因素包括心理健康诊断(-0.83;CI [-1.44, -0.22])、随访时独居(-1.98;CI [-3.40, -0.56])以及两个时间点(基线和随访时)均未接受牙科护理(-0.91;CI [-1.62, -0.20])和仅在随访时未接受牙科护理(-1.32;CI [-2.45, -0.19])。对于基线时营养风险高的人群,日常生活活动能力下降(-2.56;CI [-4.36, -0.77])和低椅起评分(-1.98;CI [-3.33, -0.63])与随访时 SCREEN-8 评分较低相关。
对于无风险和高风险人群,SCREEN-8 评分变化的决定因素不同,这表明在初级保健中需要针对筛查和治疗营养风险采取有针对性的方法。