• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价报告用于常规护理的核心结局集开发研究。

A systematic review of studies reporting the development of core outcome sets for use in routine care.

机构信息

Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Department of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;158:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.011. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.011
PMID:36948407
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Core outcome sets (COS) represent the minimum health outcomes to be measured for a given health condition. Interest is growing in using COS within routine care to support delivery of patient-focused care. This review aims to systematically map COS developed for routine care to understand their scope, stakeholder involvement, and development methods.

METHODS

Medline (Ovid), Scopus, and Web of Science Core collection were searched for studies reporting development of COS for routine care. Data on scope, methods, and stakeholder groups were analyzed in subgroups defined by setting.

RESULTS

Screening 25,301 records identified 262 COS: 164 for routine care only and 98 for routine care and research. Nearly half of the COS (112/254, 44%) were developed with patients, alongside input from experts in registries, insurance, legal, outcomes measurement, and performance management. Research publications were often searched to generate an initial list of outcomes (115/198, 58%) with few searching routine health records (47/198, 24%).

CONCLUSION

An increasing number of COS is being developed for routine care. Although involvement of patient stakeholders has increased in recent years, further improvements are needed. Methodology and scope are broadly similar to COS for research but implementation of the final set is a greater consideration during development.

摘要

目的

核心结局集(COS)代表了给定健康状况下需要测量的最低健康结果。人们越来越感兴趣的是在常规护理中使用 COS,以支持提供以患者为中心的护理。本综述旨在系统地绘制常规护理中开发的 COS 图谱,以了解其范围、利益相关者的参与情况和开发方法。

方法

在 Medline(Ovid)、Scopus 和 Web of Science 核心合集数据库中检索了报道常规护理 COS 开发的研究。根据设置,对范围、方法和利益相关者群体的数据进行了亚组分析。

结果

筛选 25,301 条记录后确定了 262 个 COS:仅用于常规护理的 164 个,以及用于常规护理和研究的 98 个。近一半的 COS(112/254,44%)是与患者一起,以及与来自登记处、保险、法律、结果测量和绩效管理方面的专家共同开发的。研究出版物经常被搜索以生成初始结果列表(115/198,58%),而很少有搜索常规健康记录(47/198,24%)的。

结论

越来越多的 COS 正在为常规护理开发。尽管近年来患者利益相关者的参与有所增加,但仍需要进一步改进。方法和范围与研究中的 COS 大致相似,但在开发过程中更需要考虑最终集的实施。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of studies reporting the development of core outcome sets for use in routine care.系统评价报告用于常规护理的核心结局集开发研究。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;158:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.011. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
Patient participation impacts outcome domain selection in core outcome sets for research: an updated systematic review.患者参与影响研究核心结局集结局领域选择:一项更新的系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2023 Jun;158:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.022. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
3
What is the value of routinely testing full blood count, electrolytes and urea, and pulmonary function tests before elective surgery in patients with no apparent clinical indication and in subgroups of patients with common comorbidities: a systematic review of the clinical and cost-effective literature.在没有明显临床指征的患者和常见合并症患者亚组中,在择期手术前常规检测全血细胞计数、电解质和尿素以及肺功能测试的价值:对临床和成本效益文献的系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Dec;16(50):i-xvi, 1-159. doi: 10.3310/hta16500.
4
The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.手术不良事件的测量与监测
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. doi: 10.3310/hta5220.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
7
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
8
Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.影响重症成人和儿童机械通气撤机方案使用的因素:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 4;10(10):CD011812. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011812.pub2.
9
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Core outcome set and measures of chest health in children and young people with cerebral palsy in the community setting: the CHESTI study protocol.社区环境中脑瘫儿童和青少年胸部健康的核心结局集与测量指标:CHESTI研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 11;15(8):e105309. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105309.
2
Identification of core outcomes for quality in routine care provided to people living with dementia in Australia: a multilevel modified Delphi consensus study.澳大利亚痴呆症患者常规护理质量核心结局的识别:一项多层次改良德尔菲共识研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 18;15(6):e096059. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096059.
3
Development of a core patient-reported outcome set for use in HIV care at the individual patient level in Montreal: protocol for a two-phased multimethod project.
开发用于蒙特利尔个体患者层面HIV护理的核心患者报告结局集:两阶段多方法项目方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):e088822. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088822.
4
Assessment of the methodological quality of studies on core outcome sets for respiratory diseases: A systematic review and meta-research study.呼吸系统疾病核心结局集研究的方法学质量评估:一项系统评价与元研究
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 2;20(1):e0316670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316670. eCollection 2025.
5
Definitions of clinical study outcome measures for cardiovascular diseases: the European Unified Registries for Heart Care Evaluation and Randomized Trials (EuroHeart).心血管疾病临床研究结局指标的定义:欧洲心脏护理评估与随机试验统一注册系统(EuroHeart)
Eur Heart J. 2025 Jan 7;46(2):190-214. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae724.
6
Current trends, barriers, and facilitators of use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews: Protocol.当前在 Cochrane 系统评价中使用核心结局集的趋势、障碍和促进因素:方案。
F1000Res. 2023 Sep 25;12:735. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.133688.2. eCollection 2023.
7
Development of a Core Outcome Set for Studies Assessing Interventions for Diabetes-Related Foot Ulceration.制定用于评估糖尿病相关足部溃疡干预措施的研究的核心结局集。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Nov 1;47(11):1958-1968. doi: 10.2337/dc24-1112.
8
Value-Based Healthcare: A Primer for the Dermatologist.基于价值的医疗保健:皮肤科医生入门指南。
Dermatology. 2024;240(5-6):814-822. doi: 10.1159/000539372. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
9
Social Prescribing Outcomes for Trials (SPOT): Protocol for a modified Delphi study on core outcomes.社会处方试验结局(SPOT):一项关于核心结局的改良 Delphi 研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 May 16;18(5):e0285182. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285182. eCollection 2023.
10
Development of core outcome sets for both research and care.制定适用于研究和护理的核心结局集。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Jul;102(7):960. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14586. Epub 2023 May 6.