Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia.
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 22;13(3):e068073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068073.
People with early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as colorectal cancer (CRC) before the age of 50, now constitute a significant patient population. In empirical and grey literature EOCRC patients report unsatisfactory experiences of care, especially in relation to protracted intervals from first help-seeking to diagnosis. This study is the first to investigate EOCRC patients' perspectives on ways to improve experiences of care. The objective is to provide foundational knowledge for the development of EOCRC-specific patient-reported experience measures (PREMs).
The study was designed as qualitative Internet Mediated Research, involving a thematic analysis of unsolicited narratives recounting personal experiences of EOCRC care. We examined advice-giving statements in 120 online texts written by EOCRC patients and survivors.
The Internet is the broad research setting. The host websites of three prominent charitable CRC support organisations were selected as specific research sites: Bowel Cancer Australia, Bowel Cancer UK and Bowel Cancer New Zealand.
We found that 90% of texts comprised statements of advice to new patients about the importance of self-advocacy in achieving quality care. Four key contexts for self-advocacy were identified: (1) accessing relevant diagnostic services; (2) driving diagnostic investigations when symptoms are not resolved; (3) involvement in treatment decision-making and (4) proactivity about preferred outcomes. Over 30% of advice-giving texts also directed statements of advice to healthcare providers, indicating that their youthfulness had been a barrier to timely diagnosis.
Healthcare barriers to, and facilitators of, patient self-advocacy may be indicators of quality EORC care. There is a need for greater awareness of the impact of age bias on the responsiveness of clinicians and healthcare services in EOCRC care. Our findings support the development of EOCRC-specific PREMs that can guide age-appropriate policy and practice for this newly identified patient population.
早发性结直肠癌(EOCRC)患者是指年龄在 50 岁以下的结直肠癌患者,目前已成为一个重要的患者群体。在实证和灰色文献中,EOCRC 患者报告称他们的护理体验不佳,尤其是在从首次寻求帮助到诊断的时间间隔较长方面。这项研究首次调查了 EOCRC 患者对改善护理体验的看法。其目的是为开发特定于 EOCRC 的患者报告体验指标(PREMs)提供基础知识。
本研究设计为定性的互联网介导研究,对 120 篇由 EOCRC 患者和幸存者撰写的未征求意见的叙述性个人护理经历进行主题分析。我们检查了 120 篇在线文本中 90%的建议性陈述,这些文本记录了 EOCRC 护理的重要性。
互联网是广泛的研究背景。三个著名的慈善结直肠癌支持组织的网站被选为特定的研究网站:澳大利亚结直肠癌协会、英国结直肠癌协会和新西兰结直肠癌协会。
我们发现,90%的文本包含了向新患者提供自我倡导对获得优质护理重要性的建议。确定了自我倡导的四个关键背景:(1)获得相关诊断服务;(2)在症状未解决时推动诊断性研究;(3)参与治疗决策;(4)对首选结果的积极性。超过 30%的建议性陈述还向医疗保健提供者提供了建议,表明他们的年轻是及时诊断的障碍。
医疗保健对患者自我倡导的障碍和促进因素可能是 EOCRC 护理质量的指标。需要提高对年龄偏见对 EOCRC 护理中临床医生和医疗服务响应能力的影响的认识。我们的研究结果支持开发特定于 EOCRC 的 PREMs,以指导针对这一新确定的患者群体的年龄适当的政策和实践。