• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线健康社区中对同行建议的感知:获取非专业知识。

Perception of peer advice in online health communities: Access to lay expertise.

机构信息

Business Management & Organisation Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

Business Management & Organisation Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113117. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113117. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113117
PMID:33865092
Abstract

When seeking advice online about health concerns, forums dedicated to medical themes are increasingly becoming an appreciated source of information for many individuals. In online health communities, patients can ask questions or otherwise seek advice that is particularly relevant to them. While they may find some of the advice useful, other advice may be perceived as less valuable. By studying the advice-seeking, advice-giving, and advice-evaluation behaviours in one of the largest online health communities in Europe, this paper looks at what determines which advice is perceived as helpful, and why. Drawing on network theory, we analysed the interaction data of 108,569 users over twelve consecutive years based on all publicly available information of an established Q&A online health community. Utilising zero-inflated negative binominal modelling, our results show that advice received from others, who have similar predominant interests, is valued more when reaching out for lay expertise. If this advice is given by peers, who can also draw on expertise from other health areas, allowing for a combination of diverse "lay" expertise, the advice is valued even more. Advice provided by those who are quick to obtain the latest knowledge available in the larger community further reinforces these effects. Our findings offer an original view to understand the influence of lay expertise exchanged via online health communities and hold implications for both policy-makers and medical practitioners regarding their approach to patient-initiated use of social media for health-related reasons.

摘要

当人们在网上寻求健康问题的建议时,专门针对医学主题的论坛越来越成为许多人的一个受欢迎的信息来源。在在线健康社区中,患者可以提出问题或寻求特别适合他们的建议。虽然他们可能会发现一些建议有用,但其他建议可能被认为价值较低。通过研究欧洲最大的在线健康社区之一的寻求建议、提供建议和评估建议的行为,本文探讨了是什么决定了哪些建议被认为是有帮助的,以及为什么。本文利用网络理论,基于一个成熟的问答式在线健康社区的所有公开信息,分析了 108569 名用户在 12 年中的交互数据。利用零膨胀负二项式模型,我们的研究结果表明,在寻求非专业知识时,从具有相似主要兴趣的其他人那里获得的建议更有价值。如果这些建议是由同龄人提供的,他们也可以借鉴其他健康领域的专业知识,从而结合多样化的“非专业”知识,那么这些建议的价值就更高。那些能够快速获取更大社区中最新知识的人提供的建议进一步强化了这些效果。我们的研究结果提供了一种理解通过在线健康社区交换的非专业知识的影响的新视角,并对政策制定者和医疗从业者在处理患者出于健康原因而使用社交媒体的问题上具有启示意义。

相似文献

1
Perception of peer advice in online health communities: Access to lay expertise.在线健康社区中对同行建议的感知:获取非专业知识。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 May;277:113117. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113117. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
2
The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media.心理健康照护的未来:朋辈支持和社交媒体。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016 Apr;25(2):113-22. doi: 10.1017/S2045796015001067. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
3
Identifying peer experts in online health forums.在线健康论坛中识别同行专家。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Apr 4;19(Suppl 3):68. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0782-3.
4
Lessons Learned for Online Health Community Moderator Roles: A Mixed-Methods Study of Moderators Resigning From WebMD Communities.在线健康社区版主角色的经验教训:一项关于从WebMD社区辞职的版主的混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 8;18(9):e247. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6331.
5
Online activity and participation in treatment affects the perceived efficacy of social health networks among patients with chronic illness.在线活动和参与治疗会影响慢性病患者对社交健康网络疗效的认知。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 10;16(1):e12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2630.
6
Benefits of peer support in online Japanese breast cancer communities: differences between lurkers and posters.日本乳腺癌在线社区中同伴支持的益处:潜水者与发帖者之间的差异。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 29;13(4):e122. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1696.
7
Prevention of HIV and Other Sexually Transmissible Infections in Expatriates and Traveler Networks: Qualitative Study of Peer Interaction in an Online Forum.预防外派人员和旅行者群体中的艾滋病毒及其他性传播感染:在线论坛中同伴互动的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Sep 5;20(9):e10787. doi: 10.2196/10787.
8
Information sought, information shared: exploring performance and image enhancing drug user-facilitated harm reduction information in online forums.寻求信息,分享信息:探索在线论坛中药物滥用者促进伤害减少的信息和形象。
Harm Reduct J. 2017 Jul 21;14(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12954-017-0176-8.
9
Giving and receiving peer advice in an online breast cancer support group.在一个在线乳腺癌支持小组中给予和接受同行建议。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Jun;16(6):480-5. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2013.1512. Epub 2013 May 9.
10
Is the American College of Surgeons Online Communities a safe and useful venue to ask for surgical advice?美国外科医师学会在线社区是否是一个寻求外科建议的安全且有用的场所?
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):5041-5045. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07299-4. Epub 2020 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
User Engagement in an Online Digital Health Intervention to Promote Problem Solving.用户参与在线数字健康干预以促进问题解决。
Interact Comput. 2024 Sep;36(5):355-369. doi: 10.1093/iwc/iwae030. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
2
Associations Among Online Health Information Seeking Behavior, Online Health Information Perception, and Health Service Utilization: Cross-Sectional Study.在线健康信息搜索行为、在线健康信息认知与医疗服务利用之间的关联:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 14;27:e66683. doi: 10.2196/66683.
3
Peer advice for women living with HIV in the Southern USA.
美国南部 HIV 感染者的同伴建议。
Cult Health Sex. 2024 Aug;26(8):1012-1027. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2023.2281371. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
4
Postdigital health practices: new directions in medical humanities.后数字健康实践:医学人文学科的新方向。
Med Humanit. 2023 Dec 19;49(4):503-510. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2023-012611.
5
Things I need you to know: a qualitative analysis of advice-giving statements in early-onset colorectal cancer patients' personal accounts published online.需要你了解的事项:对在线发表的早发性结直肠癌患者个人叙述中给出建议的陈述进行定性分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 22;13(3):e068073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068073.
6
Mining and analysing online social networks: Studying the dynamics of digital peer support.挖掘与分析在线社交网络:研究数字同伴支持的动态变化
MethodsX. 2023 Jan 7;10:102005. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102005. eCollection 2023.
7
The impact of online health community engagement on lifestyle changes: A serially mediated model.在线健康社区参与对生活方式改变的影响:一个串联中介模型。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 3;10:987331. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.987331. eCollection 2022.
8
Determining Factors Affecting the Users' Participation of Online Health Communities: An Integrated Framework of Social Capital and Social Support.影响在线健康社区用户参与度的决定因素:社会资本与社会支持的综合框架
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 14;13:823523. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.823523. eCollection 2022.
9
Misinformation in Italian Online Mental Health Communities During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Content Analysis Study.新冠疫情期间意大利在线心理健康社区中的错误信息:一项内容分析研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 May 20;11(5):e35347. doi: 10.2196/35347.
10
The Role of Communication Affordances in Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Facebook and WhatsApp Support Groups.沟通手段在创伤后应激障碍 Facebook 和 WhatsApp 支持群组中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 26;18(9):4576. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094576.