Suppr超能文献

成人社区获得性肺炎抗生素治疗的最佳持续时间:系统评价和持续时间效应荟萃分析。

Optimal duration of antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a systematic review and duration-effect meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Tokyo Musashino Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

Department of Neuropsychiatry, University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 22;13(3):e061023. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To find the optimal treatment duration with antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adults.

DESIGN

Systematic review and duration-effect meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL through 25 August 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials comparing the same antibiotics used at the same daily dosage but for different durations for CAP in adults. Both outpatients and inpatients were included but not those admitted to intensive care units. We imposed no date, language or publication status restriction.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data extraction by two independent reviewers. We conducted a random-effects, one-stage duration-effect meta-analysis with restricted cubic splines. We tested the non-inferiority with the prespecified non-inferiority margin of 10% examined against 10 days . The primary outcome was clinical improvement on day 15 (range 7-45 days).

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

all-cause mortality, serious adverse events and clinical improvement on day 30 (15-60 days).

RESULTS

We included nine trials (2399 patients with a mean (SD) age of 61.2 (22.1); 39% women). The duration-effect curve was monotonic with longer duration leading to a lower probability of improvement, and shorter treatment duration (3-9 days) was likely to be non-inferior to 10-day treatment. Harmful outcome curves indicated no association. The weighted average percentage of the primary outcome in the 10-day treatment arms was 68%. Using that average, the absolute clinical improvement rates of the following durations were: 3-day treatment 75% (95% CI: 68% to 81%), 5-day treatment 72% (95% CI: 66% to 78%) and 7-day treatment 69% (95% CI: 61% to 76%).

CONCLUSIONS

Shorter treatment duration (3-5 days) probably offers the optimal balance between efficacy and treatment burden for treating CAP in adults if they achieved clinical stability. However, the small number of included studies and the overall moderate-to-high risk of bias may compromise the certainty of the results. Further research on the shorter duration range is required.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD 42021273357.

摘要

目的

寻找成人社区获得性肺炎(CAP)抗生素治疗的最佳疗程。

设计

系统评价和疗程效应荟萃分析。

数据来源

通过 MEDLINE、Embase 和 CENTRAL 检索,检索时间截至 2021 年 8 月 25 日。

入选标准

比较成人 CAP 相同抗生素、相同日剂量但疗程不同的随机对照试验。包括门诊和住院患者,但不包括入住重症监护病房的患者。我们没有对日期、语言或出版状态进行限制。

数据提取和综合

由两名独立的审查员进行数据提取。我们进行了随机效应、单阶段疗程效应荟萃分析,并使用预定的非劣效性 10%界值进行检验,与 10 天相比。主要结局为第 15 天(7-45 天)的临床改善。

次要结局

全因死亡率、严重不良事件和第 30 天(15-60 天)的临床改善。

结果

我们纳入了 9 项试验(2399 例患者,平均年龄 61.2(22.1)岁;39%为女性)。疗程效应曲线呈单调递增,疗程越长,改善的可能性越低,而较短的治疗疗程(3-9 天)可能优于 10 天的治疗。有害结局曲线表明没有关联。10 天治疗组主要结局的加权平均百分比为 68%。使用该平均值,以下疗程的绝对临床改善率为:3 天治疗 75%(95%CI:68%-81%)、5 天治疗 72%(95%CI:66%-78%)和 7 天治疗 69%(95%CI:61%-76%)。

结论

如果成人 CAP 患者达到临床稳定,较短的治疗疗程(3-5 天)可能在疗效和治疗负担之间提供最佳平衡。然而,纳入研究数量较少,整体偏倚风险较高,可能影响结果的确定性。需要进一步研究较短的疗程范围。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD 42021273357。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b53/10040075/3f7499ec82c6/bmjopen-2022-061023f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验