• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非重症监护病房中接受社区获得性肺炎治疗的患者,在 3 天后停止使用β-内酰胺治疗(PTC):一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、非劣效性试验。

Discontinuing β-lactam treatment after 3 days for patients with community-acquired pneumonia in non-critical care wards (PTC): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial.

机构信息

Infectious Disease Unit, Raymond-Poincaré University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Saclay University, Garches, France.

Clinical research unit, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.

出版信息

Lancet. 2021 Mar 27;397(10280):1195-1203. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00313-5.

DOI:
10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00313-5
PMID:33773631
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shortening the duration of antibiotic therapy for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia should help reduce antibiotic consumption and thus bacterial resistance, adverse events, and related costs. We aimed to assess the need for an additional 5-day course of β-lactam therapy among patients with community-acquired pneumonia who were stable after 3 days of treatment.

METHODS

We did this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial (the Pneumonia Short Treatment [PTC]) in 16 centres in France. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) admitted to hospital with moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia (defined as patients admitted to a non-critical care unit) and who met prespecified clinical stability criteria after 3 days of treatment with β-lactam therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive β-lactam therapy (oral amoxicillin 1 g plus clavulanate 125 mg three times a day) or matched placebo for 5 extra days. Randomisation was done using a web-based system with permuted blocks with random sizes and stratified by randomisation site and Pneumonia Severity Index score. Participants, clinicians, and study staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was cure 15 days after first antibiotic intake, defined by apyrexia (temperature ≤37·8°C), resolution or improvement of respiratory symptoms, and no additional antibiotic treatment for any cause. A non-inferiority margin of 10 percentage points was chosen. The primary outcome was assessed in all patients who were randomly assigned and received any treatment (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) and in all patients who received their assigned treatment (per-protocol population). Safety was assessed in the ITT population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01963442, and is now complete.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 19, 2013, and Feb 1, 2018, 706 patients were assessed for eligibility, and after 3 days of β-lactam treatment, 310 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (n=157) or β-lactam treatment (n=153). Seven patients withdrew consent before taking any study drug, five in the placebo group and two in the β-lactam group. In the ITT population, median age was 73·0 years (IQR 57·0-84·0) and 123 (41%) of 303 participants were female. In the ITT analysis, cure at day 15 occurred in 117 (77%) of 152 participants in the placebo group and 102 (68%) of 151 participants in the β-lactam group (between-group difference of 9·42%, 95% CI -0·38 to 20·04), indicating non-inferiority. In the per-protocol analysis, 113 (78%) of 145 participants in the placebo treatment group and 100 (68%) of 146 participants in the β-lactam treatment group were cured at day 15 (difference of 9·44% [95% CI -0·15 to 20·34]), indicating non-inferiority. Incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups (22 [14%] of 152 in the placebo group and 29 [19%] of 151 in the β-lactam group). The most common adverse events were digestive disorders, reported in 17 (11%) of 152 patients in the placebo group and 28 (19%) of 151 patients in the β-lactam group. By day 30, three (2%) patients had died in the placebo group (one due to bacteraemia due to Staphylococcus aureus, one due to cardiogenic shock after acute pulmonary oedema, and one due to heart failure associated with acute renal failure) and two (1%) in the β-lactam group (due to pneumonia recurrence and possible acute pulmonary oedema).

INTERPRETATION

Among patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia who met clinical stability criteria, discontinuing β-lactam treatment after 3 days was non-inferior to 8 days of treatment. These findings could allow substantial reduction of antibiotic consumption.

FUNDING

French Ministry of Health.

摘要

背景

缩短社区获得性肺炎患者的抗生素治疗疗程,有助于减少抗生素的使用量,从而降低细菌耐药性、减少不良事件和相关费用。我们旨在评估在β-内酰胺治疗 3 天后病情稳定的社区获得性肺炎患者是否需要再接受 5 天的β-内酰胺治疗。

方法

我们在法国 16 个中心进行了这项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、非劣效性试验(肺炎短期治疗[PTC])。年龄≥18 岁的成年患者(定义为入住非重症监护病房的患者)在接受β-内酰胺治疗 3 天后,满足预先指定的临床稳定标准,被随机分配(1:1)接受β-内酰胺治疗(口服阿莫西林 1 g 加克拉维酸 125 mg,每日 3 次)或匹配的安慰剂治疗 5 天。随机化使用基于网络的系统,使用大小随机的排列块,并按随机化地点和肺炎严重指数评分分层。参与者、临床医生和研究人员对治疗分配不知情。主要结局是首次抗生素摄入后 15 天的治愈率,定义为体温≤37.8°C、呼吸症状缓解或改善,且无需因任何原因额外使用抗生素。选择了 10 个百分点的非劣效性边界。主要结局在所有接受随机分组并接受任何治疗的患者(意向治疗[ITT]人群)和所有接受其指定治疗的患者(方案人群)中进行评估。安全性在 ITT 人群中进行评估。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01963442,现已完成。

结果

2013 年 12 月 19 日至 2018 年 2 月 1 日,共有 706 名患者符合入选标准,在接受 3 天β-内酰胺治疗后,310 名符合条件的患者被随机分配接受安慰剂(n=157)或β-内酰胺治疗(n=153)。有 7 名患者在服用任何研究药物之前撤回了同意书,其中 5 名在安慰剂组,2 名在β-内酰胺组。在 ITT 人群中,中位年龄为 73.0 岁(IQR 57.0-84.0),303 名参与者中有 123 名(41%)为女性。在 ITT 分析中,安慰剂组 152 名参与者中有 117 名(77%)和β-内酰胺组 151 名参与者中有 102 名(68%)在第 15 天治愈(组间差异为 9.42%,95%CI -0.38 至 20.04),表明非劣效性。在方案人群分析中,安慰剂治疗组 145 名参与者中有 113 名(78%)和β-内酰胺治疗组 146 名参与者中有 100 名(68%)在第 15 天治愈(差异为 9.44%[95%CI -0.15 至 20.34]),表明非劣效性。两组不良事件的发生率相似(安慰剂组 152 名参与者中有 22 名[14%],β-内酰胺组 151 名参与者中有 29 名[19%])。最常见的不良事件是消化系统疾病,在安慰剂组 152 名患者中有 17 名(11%)和β-内酰胺组 151 名患者中有 28 名(19%)报告。到第 30 天,安慰剂组有 3 名(2%)患者死亡(1 名死于金黄色葡萄球菌引起的菌血症,1 名死于急性肺水肿引起的心源性休克,1 名死于急性肾衰竭相关的心衰),β-内酰胺组有 2 名(1%)(肺炎复发和可能的急性肺水肿)。

解释

在符合临床稳定标准的社区获得性肺炎患者中,在 3 天后停止β-内酰胺治疗与 8 天的治疗非劣效。这些发现可能会大幅减少抗生素的使用量。

资金来源

法国卫生部。

相似文献

1
Discontinuing β-lactam treatment after 3 days for patients with community-acquired pneumonia in non-critical care wards (PTC): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial.非重症监护病房中接受社区获得性肺炎治疗的患者,在 3 天后停止使用β-内酰胺治疗(PTC):一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2021 Mar 27;397(10280):1195-1203. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00313-5.
2
CAL02, a novel antitoxin liposomal agent, in severe pneumococcal pneumonia: a first-in-human, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.CAL02,一种新型抗毒素脂质体药物,在严重肺炎链球菌肺炎中的应用:一项首次人体、双盲、安慰剂对照、随机试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jun;19(6):620-630. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30805-3. Epub 2019 May 2.
3
Individualised, short-course antibiotic treatment versus usual long-course treatment for ventilator-associated pneumonia (REGARD-VAP): a multicentre, individually randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.个体化短疗程抗生素治疗与呼吸机相关性肺炎常规长疗程治疗的比较(REGARD-VAP):一项多中心、个体随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验
Lancet Respir Med. 2024 May;12(5):399-408. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00418-6. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
4
Efficacy and safety of suvratoxumab for prevention of Staphylococcus aureus ventilator-associated pneumonia (SAATELLITE): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, phase 2 pilot trial.Suvratoxumab 预防金黄色葡萄球菌呼吸机相关性肺炎(SAATELLITE)的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组、2 期先导试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Sep;21(9):1313-1323. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30995-6. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
5
Amoxicillin duration and dose for community-acquired pneumonia in children: the CAP-IT factorial non-inferiority RCT.儿童社区获得性肺炎的阿莫西林疗程和剂量:CAP-IT 析因非劣效 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Nov;25(60):1-72. doi: 10.3310/hta25600.
6
Adjunct prednisone therapy for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.辅助泼尼松治疗社区获得性肺炎患者的多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Apr 18;385(9977):1511-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62447-8. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
7
Use of ribaxamase (SYN-004), a β-lactamase, to prevent Clostridium difficile infection in β-lactam-treated patients: a double-blind, phase 2b, randomised placebo-controlled trial.利奈唑胺(SYN-004),一种β-内酰胺酶,用于预防β-内酰胺类药物治疗患者的艰难梭菌感染:一项双盲、2b 期、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 May;19(5):487-496. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30731-X. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
8
Clarithromycin for early anti-inflammatory responses in community-acquired pneumonia in Greece (ACCESS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.克拉霉素治疗希腊社区获得性肺炎的早期抗炎反应(ACCESS):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2024 Apr;12(4):294-304. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00412-5. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
9
Efficacy and safety of oral solithromycin versus oral moxifloxacin for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia: a global, double-blind, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial (SOLITAIRE-ORAL).口服索利霉素与口服莫西沙星治疗社区获得性细菌性肺炎的疗效和安全性:一项全球性、双盲、多中心、随机、阳性对照、非劣效性试验(SOLITAIRE-ORAL)。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2016 Apr;16(4):421-30. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)00017-7. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
10
Ceftaroline fosamil versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of Asian patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority with nested superiority trial.头孢呋肟磷酯与头孢曲松治疗亚洲社区获得性肺炎患者的比较:一项随机、对照、双盲、Ⅲ期、非劣效性、嵌套优效性临床试验。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Feb;15(2):161-71. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71018-7. Epub 2014 Dec 22.

引用本文的文献

1
[Principles of antimicrobial stewardship].[抗菌药物管理原则]
Dermatologie (Heidelb). 2025 Aug;76(8):465-469. doi: 10.1007/s00105-025-05530-z. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
2
Towards shortening the duration of antibiotic therapy for Lyme borreliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.缩短莱姆病抗生素治疗疗程的研究:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Infection. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s15010-025-02501-3.
3
Advantages of short-term antimicrobial treatment for pneumonia and aspiration pneumonia in older patients aged over 65: A nationwide inpatient database study.
65岁以上老年患者肺炎和吸入性肺炎短期抗菌治疗的优势:一项全国性住院患者数据库研究。
Glob Health Med. 2025 Feb 28;7(1):28-38. doi: 10.35772/ghm.2024.01087.
4
Improving effective antimicrobial resistance (AMR) prevention in ambulatory care: lessons from secondary appraisal of Belgian anti-infectious treatment care guidelines.提高门诊医疗中有效的抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)预防水平:对比利时抗感染治疗护理指南二次评估的经验教训
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 May;44(5):1251-1263. doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05075-y. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
5
Factors based on Cox regression modeling to analyze the prognostic impact of fiberoptic bronchoscopic bronchoalveolar lavage on children with severe pneumonia.基于Cox回归模型的因素,以分析纤维支气管镜支气管肺泡灌洗对重症肺炎患儿的预后影响。
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Dec 15;16(12):7645-7655. doi: 10.62347/OGZD3131. eCollection 2024.
6
Effect of hay type and breed on the fattening, centesimal and fatty acid composition of Nigerian sheep.干草类型和品种对尼日利亚绵羊育肥、化学成分及脂肪酸组成的影响。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024 Dec 27;57(1):11. doi: 10.1007/s11250-024-04256-9.
7
Impact of Clinician Feedback Reports on Antibiotic Use in Children Hospitalized With Community-acquired Pneumonia.临床医生反馈报告对社区获得性肺炎住院儿童抗生素使用的影响。
Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 24;80(2):263-270. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae593.
8
Determinants of non-adherence to antibiotic treatment guidelines in hospitalized adults with suspected community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective study.住院成人疑似社区获得性肺炎患者抗生素治疗指南不依从的决定因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Nov 23;13(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01494-2.
9
Acceptance of pharmacist-led stewardship recommendations for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.社区获得性肺炎患者对药剂师主导的管理建议的接受情况。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Oct 17;4(1):e181. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.399. eCollection 2024.
10
The optimal antibiotic treatment duration for community-acquired pneumonia in adults diagnosed in general practice in Denmark (CAP-D): an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.丹麦普通实践中诊断的成人社区获得性肺炎(CAP-D)的最佳抗生素治疗持续时间:一项开放标签、实用、随机对照试验。
Trials. 2024 Sep 27;25(1):627. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08477-z.