Suppr超能文献

非重症监护病房中接受社区获得性肺炎治疗的患者,在 3 天后停止使用β-内酰胺治疗(PTC):一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、非劣效性试验。

Discontinuing β-lactam treatment after 3 days for patients with community-acquired pneumonia in non-critical care wards (PTC): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial.

机构信息

Infectious Disease Unit, Raymond-Poincaré University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris Saclay University, Garches, France.

Clinical research unit, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France.

出版信息

Lancet. 2021 Mar 27;397(10280):1195-1203. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00313-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Shortening the duration of antibiotic therapy for patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia should help reduce antibiotic consumption and thus bacterial resistance, adverse events, and related costs. We aimed to assess the need for an additional 5-day course of β-lactam therapy among patients with community-acquired pneumonia who were stable after 3 days of treatment.

METHODS

We did this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial (the Pneumonia Short Treatment [PTC]) in 16 centres in France. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) admitted to hospital with moderately severe community-acquired pneumonia (defined as patients admitted to a non-critical care unit) and who met prespecified clinical stability criteria after 3 days of treatment with β-lactam therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive β-lactam therapy (oral amoxicillin 1 g plus clavulanate 125 mg three times a day) or matched placebo for 5 extra days. Randomisation was done using a web-based system with permuted blocks with random sizes and stratified by randomisation site and Pneumonia Severity Index score. Participants, clinicians, and study staff were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was cure 15 days after first antibiotic intake, defined by apyrexia (temperature ≤37·8°C), resolution or improvement of respiratory symptoms, and no additional antibiotic treatment for any cause. A non-inferiority margin of 10 percentage points was chosen. The primary outcome was assessed in all patients who were randomly assigned and received any treatment (intention-to-treat [ITT] population) and in all patients who received their assigned treatment (per-protocol population). Safety was assessed in the ITT population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01963442, and is now complete.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 19, 2013, and Feb 1, 2018, 706 patients were assessed for eligibility, and after 3 days of β-lactam treatment, 310 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either placebo (n=157) or β-lactam treatment (n=153). Seven patients withdrew consent before taking any study drug, five in the placebo group and two in the β-lactam group. In the ITT population, median age was 73·0 years (IQR 57·0-84·0) and 123 (41%) of 303 participants were female. In the ITT analysis, cure at day 15 occurred in 117 (77%) of 152 participants in the placebo group and 102 (68%) of 151 participants in the β-lactam group (between-group difference of 9·42%, 95% CI -0·38 to 20·04), indicating non-inferiority. In the per-protocol analysis, 113 (78%) of 145 participants in the placebo treatment group and 100 (68%) of 146 participants in the β-lactam treatment group were cured at day 15 (difference of 9·44% [95% CI -0·15 to 20·34]), indicating non-inferiority. Incidence of adverse events was similar between the treatment groups (22 [14%] of 152 in the placebo group and 29 [19%] of 151 in the β-lactam group). The most common adverse events were digestive disorders, reported in 17 (11%) of 152 patients in the placebo group and 28 (19%) of 151 patients in the β-lactam group. By day 30, three (2%) patients had died in the placebo group (one due to bacteraemia due to Staphylococcus aureus, one due to cardiogenic shock after acute pulmonary oedema, and one due to heart failure associated with acute renal failure) and two (1%) in the β-lactam group (due to pneumonia recurrence and possible acute pulmonary oedema).

INTERPRETATION

Among patients admitted to hospital with community-acquired pneumonia who met clinical stability criteria, discontinuing β-lactam treatment after 3 days was non-inferior to 8 days of treatment. These findings could allow substantial reduction of antibiotic consumption.

FUNDING

French Ministry of Health.

摘要

背景

缩短社区获得性肺炎患者的抗生素治疗疗程,有助于减少抗生素的使用量,从而降低细菌耐药性、减少不良事件和相关费用。我们旨在评估在β-内酰胺治疗 3 天后病情稳定的社区获得性肺炎患者是否需要再接受 5 天的β-内酰胺治疗。

方法

我们在法国 16 个中心进行了这项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、非劣效性试验(肺炎短期治疗[PTC])。年龄≥18 岁的成年患者(定义为入住非重症监护病房的患者)在接受β-内酰胺治疗 3 天后,满足预先指定的临床稳定标准,被随机分配(1:1)接受β-内酰胺治疗(口服阿莫西林 1 g 加克拉维酸 125 mg,每日 3 次)或匹配的安慰剂治疗 5 天。随机化使用基于网络的系统,使用大小随机的排列块,并按随机化地点和肺炎严重指数评分分层。参与者、临床医生和研究人员对治疗分配不知情。主要结局是首次抗生素摄入后 15 天的治愈率,定义为体温≤37.8°C、呼吸症状缓解或改善,且无需因任何原因额外使用抗生素。选择了 10 个百分点的非劣效性边界。主要结局在所有接受随机分组并接受任何治疗的患者(意向治疗[ITT]人群)和所有接受其指定治疗的患者(方案人群)中进行评估。安全性在 ITT 人群中进行评估。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01963442,现已完成。

结果

2013 年 12 月 19 日至 2018 年 2 月 1 日,共有 706 名患者符合入选标准,在接受 3 天β-内酰胺治疗后,310 名符合条件的患者被随机分配接受安慰剂(n=157)或β-内酰胺治疗(n=153)。有 7 名患者在服用任何研究药物之前撤回了同意书,其中 5 名在安慰剂组,2 名在β-内酰胺组。在 ITT 人群中,中位年龄为 73.0 岁(IQR 57.0-84.0),303 名参与者中有 123 名(41%)为女性。在 ITT 分析中,安慰剂组 152 名参与者中有 117 名(77%)和β-内酰胺组 151 名参与者中有 102 名(68%)在第 15 天治愈(组间差异为 9.42%,95%CI -0.38 至 20.04),表明非劣效性。在方案人群分析中,安慰剂治疗组 145 名参与者中有 113 名(78%)和β-内酰胺治疗组 146 名参与者中有 100 名(68%)在第 15 天治愈(差异为 9.44%[95%CI -0.15 至 20.34]),表明非劣效性。两组不良事件的发生率相似(安慰剂组 152 名参与者中有 22 名[14%],β-内酰胺组 151 名参与者中有 29 名[19%])。最常见的不良事件是消化系统疾病,在安慰剂组 152 名患者中有 17 名(11%)和β-内酰胺组 151 名患者中有 28 名(19%)报告。到第 30 天,安慰剂组有 3 名(2%)患者死亡(1 名死于金黄色葡萄球菌引起的菌血症,1 名死于急性肺水肿引起的心源性休克,1 名死于急性肾衰竭相关的心衰),β-内酰胺组有 2 名(1%)(肺炎复发和可能的急性肺水肿)。

解释

在符合临床稳定标准的社区获得性肺炎患者中,在 3 天后停止β-内酰胺治疗与 8 天的治疗非劣效。这些发现可能会大幅减少抗生素的使用量。

资金来源

法国卫生部。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验