Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, Australia.
Ind Health. 2024 Feb 9;62(1):2-19. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2022-0140. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
Regulatory guidance materials for fatigue management typically advise that employees be provided with days or weeks of advance notice of schedules/rosters. However, the scientific evidence underpinning this advice is unclear. A systematic search was performed on current peer reviewed literature addressing advance notice periods, which found three relevant studies. A subsequent search of grey literature to determine the quality of evidence for the recommendation for advance notice periods returned 37 relevant documents. This review found that fatigue management guidance materials frequently advocated advance notice for work shifts but did not provide empirical evidence to underpin the advice. Although it is logical to suggest that longer notice periods may result in increased opportunities for pre-work preparations, improved sleep, and reduced worker fatigue, the current guidance appears to be premised on this reasoning rather than empirical evidence. Paradoxically, it is possible that advance notice could be counterproductive, as too much may result in frequent alterations to the schedule, particularly where adjustments to start and end times of the work period are not uncommon (e.g., road transport, rail). To assist organisations in determining the appropriate amount of advance notice to provide, we propose a novel theoretical framework to conceptualise advance notice.
疲劳管理的监管指导材料通常建议为员工提供日程/时间表的提前几天或几周的通知。然而,为这一建议提供支持的科学证据并不明确。对目前关于提前通知期的同行评审文献进行了系统检索,发现了三项相关研究。随后对灰色文献进行了检索,以确定关于提前通知期的建议的证据质量,共检索到 37 份相关文件。本综述发现,疲劳管理指导材料经常提倡为工作班次提供提前通知,但没有提供支持这一建议的经验证据。虽然从逻辑上讲,较长的通知期可能会增加工作前准备、改善睡眠和减少工人疲劳的机会,但目前的指导似乎基于这种推理,而不是经验证据。矛盾的是,提前通知可能适得其反,因为通知时间过长可能会导致频繁更改时间表,尤其是在工作时间的开始和结束时间经常调整的情况下(例如,公路运输、铁路)。为了帮助组织确定提供提前通知的适当时间,我们提出了一个新概念框架来概念化提前通知。