Suppr超能文献

经肠系膜静脉肝外门体分流术与经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗门静脉海绵样变性疗效的对比分析研究

[Study on the comparative analysis of the efficacy of transmesenteric vein extrahepatic portosystemic shunt and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in the treatment of cavernous transformation of portal vein].

作者信息

Zhu Y D, Li W X, Cui M Z, Wang H, Yang H P, Zhai S T

机构信息

Departent of Vascular Surgery, Henan University People's Hospital(Henan Provincial People's Hospital), Zhengzhou 450003, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2023 Jan 20;31(1):90-95. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501113-20221002-00485.

Abstract

To compare the safety and efficacy of transmesenteric vein extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TEPS) and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in the treatment of cavernous transformation of the portal vein (CTPV). The clinical data of CTPV patients with patency or partial patency of the superior mesenteric vein treated with TIPS or TEPS treatment in the Department of Vascular Surgery of Henan Provincial People's Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 were selected. The differences in baseline data, surgical success rate, complication rate, incidence rate of hepatic encephalopathy, and other related indicators between TIPS and TEPS group were statistically analyzed by independent sample t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-square test. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to calculate the cumulative patency rate of the shunt and the recurrence rate of postoperative portal hypertension symptoms in both groups. The surgical success rate (100% vs. 65.52%), surgical complication rate (6.67% vs. 36.84%), cumulative shunt patency rate (100% vs. 70.70%), and cumulative symptom recurrence rate (0% vs. 25.71%) of the TEPS group and TIPS group were statistically significantly different ( < 0.05). The time of establishing the shunt [28 (2141) min vs. 82 (51206) min], the number of stents used [1 (12) vs. 2 (15)], and the length of the shunt [10 (912) cm vs. 16 (1220) cm] were statistically significant between the two groups ( = -3.764, -4.059, -1.765, < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative hepatic encephalopathy in the TEPS group and TIPS group was 6.67% and 15.79% respectively, with no statistically significant difference (Fisher's exact probability method, = 0.613). The pressure of superior mesenteric vein decreased from (29.33 ± 1.99) mmHg to (14.60 ± 2.80) mmHg in the TEPS group and from (29.68 ± 2.31) mmHg to (15.79 ± 3.01) mmHg in TIPS group after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant ( = 16.625, 15.959, < 0.01). The best indication of TEPS is in CTPV patients with patency or partial patency of the superior mesenteric vein. TEPS improves the accuracy and success rate of surgery and reduces the incidence of complications.

摘要

比较经肠系膜静脉肝外门体分流术(TEPS)与经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)治疗门静脉海绵样变性(CTPV)的安全性和疗效。选取2019年1月至2021年12月在河南省人民医院血管外科接受TIPS或TEPS治疗的肠系膜上静脉通畅或部分通畅的CTPV患者的临床资料。采用独立样本t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验和卡方检验对TIPS组和TEPS组的基线数据、手术成功率、并发症发生率、肝性脑病发生率等相关指标进行统计学分析。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线计算两组分流的累积通畅率和术后门静脉高压症状复发率。TEPS组和TIPS组的手术成功率(100% vs. 65.52%)、手术并发症发生率(6.67% vs. 36.84%)、分流累积通畅率(100% vs. 70.70%)和症状累积复发率(0% vs. 25.71%)差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组间建立分流的时间[28(2141)分钟 vs. 82(51206)分钟]、使用支架数量[1(12) vs. 2(15)]和分流长度[10(912)厘米 vs. 16(1220)厘米]差异有统计学意义(t=-3.764,-4.059,-1.765,P<0.05)。TEPS组和TIPS组术后肝性脑病发生率分别为6.67%和15.79%,差异无统计学意义(Fisher确切概率法,P=0.613)。TEPS组术后肠系膜上静脉压力由(29.33±1.99)mmHg降至(14.60±2.80)mmHg,TIPS组由(29.68±2.31)mmHg降至(15.79±3.01)mmHg,差异有统计学意义(t=16.625,15.959,P<0.01)。TEPS的最佳适应证是肠系膜上静脉通畅或部分通畅的CTPV患者。TEPS提高了手术的准确性和成功率,降低了并发症的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验