Westmead Research Centre for Evaluation of Surgical Outcomes, Department of Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, Australia.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Mar 22;21(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02111-3.
Over the past few decades the benefits of assessing Quality of Life (QoL) and mental health in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) have steadily increased with limited studies relating to the most useful method to assess these patients. This study aims to identify, review, summarise, and evaluate the methodological quality for the most validated commonly used health-related QoL and mental health assessment measurements in diabetic patients.
All original articles published on PubMed, MedLine, OVID, The Cochrane Register, Web of Science Conference Proceedings and Scopus databases were systematically reviewed between 2011 and 2022. A search strategy was developed for each database using all possible combinations of the following keywords: "type 2 diabetes mellitus", "quality of life", mental health", and "questionnaires". Studies conducted on patients with T2DM of ≥ 18 years with or without other clinical illnesses were included. Articles designed as a literature or systematic review conducted on either children or adolescents, healthy adults and/or with a small sample size were excluded.
A total of 489 articles were identified in all of the electronic medical databases. Of these articles, 40 were shown to meet our eligibility criteria to be included in this systematic review. Approximately, 60% of these studies were cross-sectional, 22.5% were clinical trials, and 17.5% of cohort studies. The top commonly used QoL measurements are the SF-12 identified in 19 studies, the SF-36, included in 16 studies, and the EuroQoL EQ-5D, found in 8 studies. Fifteen (37.5%) studies used only one questionnaire, while the remaining reviewed (62.5%) used more than one questionnaire. Finally, the majority (90%) of studies reported using self-administered questionnaires and only 4 used interviewer mode of administration.
Our evidence highlights that the commonly used questionnaire to evaluate the QoL and mental health is the SF-12 followed by SF-36. Both of these questionnaires are validated, reliable and supported in different languages. Moreover, using single or combined questionnaires as well as the mode of administration depends on the clinical research question and aim of the study.
在过去几十年中,评估 2 型糖尿病患者生活质量(QoL)和心理健康的益处稳步增加,但与评估这些患者最有用的方法相关的研究有限。本研究旨在确定、回顾、总结和评估在糖尿病患者中最常用和最有效的健康相关生活质量和心理健康评估测量的方法学质量。
系统检索了 2011 年至 2022 年期间在 PubMed、MedLine、OVID、Cochrane 注册中心、Web of Science 会议录和 Scopus 数据库上发表的所有原始文章。为每个数据库开发了一种搜索策略,使用了以下关键词的所有可能组合:“2 型糖尿病”、“生活质量”、“心理健康”和“问卷”。纳入了年龄≥18 岁的患有或不患有其他临床疾病的 2 型糖尿病患者的研究。排除了设计为针对儿童或青少年、健康成年人以及样本量较小的文献综述或系统综述的文章。
在所有电子医学数据库中,共确定了 489 篇文章。其中,有 40 篇文章符合纳入本系统综述的标准。这些研究中约 60%为横断面研究,22.5%为临床试验,17.5%为队列研究。最常用的生活质量测量工具是在 19 项研究中使用的 SF-12,在 16 项研究中使用的 SF-36,在 8 项研究中使用的 EuroQoL EQ-5D。有 15 项(37.5%)研究仅使用了一种问卷,而其余(62.5%)研究使用了多种问卷。最后,大多数(90%)研究报告使用了自我管理问卷,只有 4 项研究使用了访谈者管理模式。
我们的证据表明,评估生活质量和心理健康最常用的问卷是 SF-12,其次是 SF-36。这两个问卷都是经过验证的、可靠的,并在不同的语言中得到支持。此外,使用单一或组合问卷以及管理模式取决于临床研究问题和研究目的。