Suppr超能文献

两种提取方法对上颌前牙牙槽嵴保存效果的比较。

Comparison of the effects of two extraction methods on the alveolar ridge preservation of Maxillary Anterior Teeth.

作者信息

Jiang Si, Zhou Biao, Li Zheng, Gao Juan, Wang Pei

机构信息

Si Jiang, Department of Stomatology, Baoding First Central Hospital, Baoding 071000, Hebei, P. R. China.

Biao Zhou, Department of Stomatology, The No.2 Hospital of Baoding, Baoding, Hebei 071000, P. R. China.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2023 Mar-Apr;39(2):549-552. doi: 10.12669/pjms.39.2.6643.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of high-speed turbodrill root extraction and piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement on the alveolar ridge preservation of maxillary anterior teeth.

METHODS

Thirty-six clinically eligible patients admitted to the No.2 Hospital of Baoding or the Baoding First Central Hospital from January 2018 to November 2019 were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Group-A were extracted by high-speed turbodrill root extraction, while Group-B were extracted by piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement. After extraction, GBR bone grafting and soft tissue transplantation were performed on the extraction sockets. The extraction time, integrity rate of labial bone plate of the extraction socket, pain-free rate, satisfaction rate, reduction of the height and width of the alveolar ridge, alveolar bone mineral density score, and new bone contour score of the alveolar bone of two groups were compared.

RESULT

Group-B was significantly superior to Group-A in terms of tooth extraction time, pain-free rate, satisfaction rate and reduction of alveolar ridge height at three sites on the palatal side, with a statistically significant difference (0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Piezosurgery tooth socket enlargement is more worthy of clinical application due to its advantages of less impact on the preservation of the palatal alveolar ridge height of the maxillary anterior teeth, shorter tooth extraction time, postoperative pain-free rate and high final satisfaction rate.

摘要

目的

比较高速涡轮钻牙根拔除术与超声骨刀扩大牙槽窝对上颌前牙牙槽嵴保存的效果。

方法

选取2018年1月至2019年11月在保定市第二医院或保定市第一中心医院就诊的36例临床符合条件的患者,随机分为两组。A组采用高速涡轮钻牙根拔除术,B组采用超声骨刀扩大牙槽窝。拔牙后,对拔牙窝进行引导骨再生植骨及软组织移植。比较两组的拔牙时间、拔牙窝唇侧骨板完整率、无痛率、满意率、牙槽嵴高度和宽度的降低情况、牙槽骨骨密度评分以及牙槽骨新骨轮廓评分。

结果

B组在拔牙时间、无痛率、满意率以及腭侧三个位点牙槽嵴高度降低方面均显著优于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

超声骨刀扩大牙槽窝对上颌前牙腭侧牙槽嵴高度保存影响小、拔牙时间短、术后无痛率高且最终满意率高,更值得临床应用。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Immediate placement of endosseous implants into the extraction sockets.将骨内种植体立即植入拔牙窝。
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015 Apr;7(Suppl 1):S234-7. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.155926.
7
Ridge preservation for implant therapy: a review of the literature.用于种植治疗的牙槽嵴保存:文献综述
Open Dent J. 2014 May 16;8:66-76. doi: 10.2174/1874210601408010066. eCollection 2014.
9
Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets.拔牙窝生物学和治疗的循证知识。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Feb;23 Suppl 5:80-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02370.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验