Health Sciences Department, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil.
Department of Physical Therapy, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
J Physiother. 2023 Apr;69(2):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2023.02.016. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
In people with chronic non-specific low back pain, what is the effect of self-administered stretching exercises relative to motor control exercises on pain intensity, disability, fear avoidance, global perceived effect and flexibility?
Randomised trial with concealed allocation, intention-to-treat analysis and blinding of assessors.
One hundred people with chronic non-specific low back pain.
The self-stretching exercise group performed 6 stretches in 40-minute sessions. The motor control exercise group performed trunk stabilising exercises in 40-minute sessions. Both groups performed weekly supervised sessions for 8 weeks with one or more home sessions/week.
The primary outcomes were pain intensity (0 to 10 scale) and disability (Oswestry Disability Index). The secondary outcomes were the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, global perceived effect, and the fingertip-to-floor test. Measures were taken at baseline and at 8, 13 and 26 weeks.
On the 0 to 10 scale, the between-group difference in pain intensity was negligible, with a mean difference of roughly 0 (95% CI -1 to 1) at each time point. Similarly, the between-group difference on the 100-point disability scale was negligible: MD -1 (95% CI -3 to 1) at week 8, MD 1 (95% CI -1 to 3) at week 13 and MD 0 (95% CI -1 to 2) at week 26. The two interventions also had similar effects on the secondary outcomes.
In people with chronic non-specific low back pain, self-stretching exercises had very similar effects to motor control exercises on pain intensity, disability, fear avoidance, global perceived effect and flexibility up to 18 weeks beyond the end of an 8-week program. Given the established effectiveness of motor control exercises, either intervention could be recommended to people with chronic low back pain. The choice of intervention might be directed by patient preference.
NCT03128801.
在患有慢性非特异性下腰痛的人群中,自我管理拉伸运动与运动控制训练相比,在疼痛强度、残疾、恐惧回避、整体感知效果和柔韧性方面的效果如何?
随机试验,设隐匿分组,意向治疗分析和评估者设盲。
100 名患有慢性非特异性下腰痛的患者。
自我拉伸运动组在 40 分钟的课程中进行 6 次拉伸运动。运动控制运动组在 40 分钟的课程中进行躯干稳定运动。两组患者均每周接受一次监督治疗,持续 8 周,每周至少进行 1 次家庭治疗。
主要结局指标为疼痛强度(0 到 10 分)和残疾(Oswestry 残疾指数)。次要结局指标为恐惧回避信念问卷、整体感知效果和指尖到地板测试。在基线时以及 8、13 和 26 周时进行测量。
在 0 到 10 分的评分上,两组间疼痛强度的差异可忽略不计,每个时间点的平均差异约为 0(95%CI -1 到 1)。同样,在 100 分残疾评分上,两组间的差异也可忽略不计:第 8 周时 MD -1(95%CI -3 到 1),第 13 周时 MD 1(95%CI -1 到 3),第 26 周时 MD 0(95%CI -1 到 2)。两种干预措施对次要结局的影响也相似。
在患有慢性非特异性下腰痛的人群中,自我拉伸运动与运动控制训练相比,在 8 周治疗结束后 18 周内,在疼痛强度、残疾、恐惧回避、整体感知效果和柔韧性方面的效果非常相似。鉴于运动控制训练的有效性已得到证实,任何一种干预措施都可以推荐给患有慢性下腰痛的患者。干预措施的选择可能取决于患者的偏好。
NCT03128801。