• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解错失恐惧和自我调节不足在社交媒体上深度伪造内容分享中的作用:来自八个国家的证据。

Understanding the role of fear of missing out and deficient self-regulation in sharing of deepfakes on social media: Evidence from eight countries.

作者信息

Ahmed Saifuddin, Ng Sheryl Wei Ting, Bee Adeline Wei Ting

机构信息

Wee Kim Wee School for Communication and Information, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Communications and New Media, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 7;14:1127507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127507. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127507
PMID:36959999
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10027756/
Abstract

Deepfakes are a troubling form of disinformation that has been drawing increasing attention. Yet, there remains a lack of psychological explanations for deepfake sharing behavior and an absence of research knowledge in non-Western contexts where public knowledge of deepfakes is limited. We conduct a cross-national survey study in eight countries to examine the role of fear of missing out (FOMO), deficient self-regulation (DSR), and cognitive ability in deepfake sharing behavior. Results are drawn from a comparative survey in seven South Asian contexts (China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam) and compare these findings to the United States, where discussions about deepfakes have been most relevant. Overall, the results suggest that those who perceive the deepfakes to be accurate are more likely to share them on social media. Furthermore, in all countries, sharing is also driven by the social-psychological trait - FOMO. DSR of social media use was also found to be a critical factor in explaining deepfake sharing. It is also observed that individuals with low cognitive ability are more likely to share deepfakes. However, we also find that the effects of DSR on social media and FOMO are not contingent upon users' cognitive ability. The results of this study contribute to strategies to limit deepfakes propagation on social media.

摘要

深度伪造是一种令人不安的虚假信息形式,已引起越来越多的关注。然而,对于深度伪造分享行为,仍然缺乏心理学解释,而且在深度伪造公众认知有限的非西方背景下,也缺乏相关研究知识。我们在八个国家开展了一项跨国调查研究,以考察错失恐惧(FOMO)、自我调节不足(DSR)和认知能力在深度伪造分享行为中的作用。研究结果来自于对七个南亚国家(中国、印度尼西亚、马来西亚、菲律宾、新加坡、泰国和越南)的比较调查,并将这些结果与美国进行比较,在美国,关于深度伪造的讨论最为热烈。总体而言,结果表明,那些认为深度伪造准确的人更有可能在社交媒体上分享它们。此外,在所有国家,分享行为也受到社会心理特质——错失恐惧的驱动。社交媒体使用的自我调节不足也被发现是解释深度伪造分享行为的一个关键因素。研究还观察到,认知能力低的个体更有可能分享深度伪造内容。然而,我们也发现,社交媒体上自我调节不足和错失恐惧的影响并不取决于用户的认知能力。这项研究的结果有助于制定限制深度伪造在社交媒体上传播的策略。

相似文献

1
Understanding the role of fear of missing out and deficient self-regulation in sharing of deepfakes on social media: Evidence from eight countries.理解错失恐惧和自我调节不足在社交媒体上深度伪造内容分享中的作用:来自八个国家的证据。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 7;14:1127507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127507. eCollection 2023.
2
Perception and deception: Exploring individual responses to deepfakes across different modalities.感知与欺骗:探究个体对不同模态下深度伪造技术的反应。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 21;9(10):e20383. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20383. eCollection 2023 Oct.
3
Deepfakes: Awareness, Concerns, and Platform Accountability.深度伪造:认知、担忧与平台问责制。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Mar;24(3):164-172. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0100.
4
Do deepfake videos undermine our epistemic trust? A thematic analysis of tweets that discuss deepfakes in the Russian invasion of Ukraine.深度伪造视频是否破坏了我们的认知信任?对讨论俄罗斯入侵乌克兰中的深度伪造的推文的主题分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 25;18(10):e0291668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291668. eCollection 2023.
5
Deepfakes and Democracy (Theory): How Synthetic Audio-Visual Media for Disinformation and Hate Speech Threaten Core Democratic Functions.深度伪造与民主(理论):用于虚假信息和仇恨言论的合成视听媒体如何威胁民主核心功能。
Digit Soc. 2022;1(2):19. doi: 10.1007/s44206-022-00010-6. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
6
Social media use and everyday cognitive failure: investigating the fear of missing out and social networks use disorder relationship.社交媒体使用与日常认知失败:探究错失恐惧与社交网络使用障碍的关系。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 24;23(1):872. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05371-x.
7
A Review of Image Processing Techniques for Deepfakes.深度伪造的图像处理技术综述。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 16;22(12):4556. doi: 10.3390/s22124556.
8
Audio deepfakes: A survey.音频深度伪造:一项调查。
Front Big Data. 2023 Jan 9;5:1001063. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2022.1001063. eCollection 2022.
9
Using deepfakes for experiments in the social sciences - A pilot study.利用深度伪造技术进行社会科学实验——一项试点研究。
Front Sociol. 2022 Nov 29;7:907199. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2022.907199. eCollection 2022.
10
Fear of Missing Out as a Predictor of Problematic Social Media Use and Phubbing Behavior among Flemish Adolescents.错失恐惧预测佛兰芒青少年社交媒体使用问题和低头症行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Oct 22;15(10):2319. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15102319.

引用本文的文献

1
Can deepfakes manipulate us? Assessing the evidence via a critical scoping review.深度伪造能操控我们吗?通过批判性范围综述评估证据。
PLoS One. 2025 May 2;20(5):e0320124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320124. eCollection 2025.
2
Perception and deception: Exploring individual responses to deepfakes across different modalities.感知与欺骗:探究个体对不同模态下深度伪造技术的反应。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 21;9(10):e20383. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20383. eCollection 2023 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
To share or not to share - The underlying motives of sharing fake news amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia.分享还是不分享——马来西亚新冠疫情期间分享假新闻的潜在动机。
Technol Soc. 2021 Aug;66:101676. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101676. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
2
Fake news zealots: Effect of perception of news on online sharing behavior.虚假新闻狂热者:新闻认知对在线分享行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jul 26;13:859534. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.859534. eCollection 2022.
3
Analytic thinking predicts accuracy ratings and willingness to share COVID-19 misinformation in Australia.分析思维预测澳大利亚对 COVID-19 错误信息的准确性评分和分享意愿。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Feb;50(2):425-434. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01219-5. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
4
Deepfakes: Awareness, Concerns, and Platform Accountability.深度伪造:认知、担忧与平台问责制。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Mar;24(3):164-172. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0100.
5
Popular Discourse Around Deepfakes and the Interdisciplinary Challenge of Fake Video Distribution.关于 Deepfake 的流行话语和假视频传播的跨学科挑战。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Mar;24(3):159-163. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0183. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
6
Can you believe it? An investigation into the impact of retraction source credibility on the continued influence effect.你能相信吗?一项关于撤稿来源可信度对持续影响效应影响的调查。
Mem Cognit. 2021 May;49(4):631-644. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01129-y. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
7
Misinformation sharing and social media fatigue during COVID-19: An affordance and cognitive load perspective.新冠疫情期间的错误信息传播与社交媒体疲劳:基于可供性和认知负荷的视角
Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2020 Oct;159:120201. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120201. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
8
The spread of true and false news online.网络上真实和虚假新闻的传播。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1146-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559.
9
Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing.错误信息及其纠正:持续影响与成功去偏倚
Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2012 Dec;13(3):106-31. doi: 10.1177/1529100612451018.