Matsika Tiroyaone A, Masunga Gaseitsiwe S, Makati Anastacia, McCulloch Graham, Stronza Amanda, Songhurst Anna C, Adjetey Joseph A, Obopile Motshwari
Botswana University of Agriculture and Natural Resources Gaborone Botswana.
Ecoexist Trust Maun Botswana.
Ecol Evol. 2023 Mar 21;13(3):e9910. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9910. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Elephants frequently raid crops within their ranges in Africa and Asia. These raids can greatly impact agricultural productivity and food security for farmers. Therefore, there is a need to explore cost-effective measures that would reduce the susceptibility of crops and agricultural fields to elephant raiding, and further promote sustainable human-elephant coexistence. Previous studies have examined the susceptibility of crop fields to elephant raids using field characteristics such as field size and proximity to water sources. However, there are limited studies investigating how different crop types, individually and in their combinations, influence crop susceptibility to elephant raiding. This study utilized data collected from crop fields raided by the African savanna elephant () between 2008 and 2018 in the eastern Okavango Panhandle, northern Botswana. Data on crops grown, number of crop-raiding incidences for each crop, and elephant raiding incidences were recorded for each field assessed. Incidence risks (IR) and field risk value (RV) were computed using an adaptive epidemiological approach. The results showed that elephant raiding incidents varied significantly amongst crop types over space and time ( < .0001). Cereal crops (millet: , maize: ) incurred a higher number of crop-raiding incidents compared with leguminous crops (cowpea: ; groundnut: ). Field RVs significantly varied depending on which crop was present in the field. There was a significant negative correlation between the number of crop types and the susceptibility of the field to raiding ( = -0.680, < .0001). Our results suggest that the susceptibility of the fields to elephant raids could be minimized by selecting crop types and combinations less susceptible to elephant damage, thus enhancing food security for local subsistence farmers.
在非洲和亚洲,大象经常在其活动范围内袭击农作物。这些袭击会极大地影响农业生产力以及农民的粮食安全。因此,有必要探索具有成本效益的措施,以降低农作物和农田对大象袭击的易感性,并进一步促进人类与大象的可持续共存。以往的研究利用田间特征,如田地大小和与水源的距离,来考察农田对大象袭击的易感性。然而,关于不同作物类型单独以及组合起来如何影响作物对大象袭击的易感性的研究却很有限。本研究利用了2008年至2018年期间在博茨瓦纳北部奥卡万戈河东部泛洪区被非洲草原象( )袭击的农田所收集的数据。对每个评估田地记录了种植的作物、每种作物的作物袭击事件数量以及大象袭击事件。使用适应性流行病学方法计算发病风险(IR)和田地风险值(RV)。结果表明,大象袭击事件在不同作物类型之间随空间和时间有显著差异( < 0.0001)。与豆类作物(豇豆: ;花生: )相比,谷类作物(小米: ;玉米: )遭受的作物袭击事件更多。田地的RVs根据田地里种植的作物不同而有显著差异。作物类型数量与田地对袭击的易感性之间存在显著的负相关( = -0.680, < 0.0001)。我们的结果表明,通过选择对大象破坏较不敏感的作物类型及其组合,可以将田地对大象袭击的易感性降至最低,从而增强当地自给农民的粮食安全。