School of Natural Resources and Environment, 103 Black Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, U.S.A.
Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, 110 Newins-Ziegler Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, U.S.A.
Conserv Biol. 2015 Aug;29(4):1100-1110. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12475. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
Crop and livestock depredation by wildlife is a primary driver of human-wildlife conflict, a problem that threatens the coexistence of people and wildlife globally. Understanding mechanisms that underlie depredation patterns holds the key to mitigating conflicts across time and space. However, most studies do not consider imperfect detection and reporting of conflicts, which may lead to incorrect inference regarding its spatiotemporal drivers. We applied dynamic occupancy models to elephant crop depredation data from India between 2005 and 2011 to estimate crop depredation occurrence and model its underlying dynamics as a function of spatiotemporal covariates while accounting for imperfect detection of conflicts. The probability of detecting conflicts was consistently <1.0 and was negatively influenced by distance to roads and elevation gradient, averaging 0.08-0.56 across primary periods (distinct agricultural seasons within each year). The probability of crop depredation occurrence ranged from 0.29 (SE 0.09) to 0.96 (SE 0.04). The probability that sites raided by elephants in primary period t would not be raided in primary period t + 1 varied with elevation gradient in different seasons and was influenced negatively by mean rainfall and village density and positively by distance to forests. Negative effects of rainfall variation and distance to forests best explained variation in the probability that sites not raided by elephants in primary period t would be raided in primary period t + 1. With our novel application of occupancy models, we teased apart the spatiotemporal drivers of conflicts from factors that influence how they are observed, thereby allowing more reliable inference on mechanisms underlying observed conflict patterns. We found that factors associated with increased crop accessibility and availability (e.g., distance to forests and rainfall patterns) were key drivers of elephant crop depredation dynamics. Such an understanding is essential for rigorous prediction of future conflicts, a critical requirement for effective conflict management in the context of increasing human-wildlife interactions.
野生动物对农作物和牲畜的破坏是导致人与野生动物冲突的主要因素,这一问题在全球范围内威胁着人类与野生动物的共存。了解导致破坏模式的机制是缓解时间和空间上冲突的关键。然而,大多数研究都没有考虑到冲突的不完全检测和报告,这可能导致对其时空驱动因素的不正确推断。我们应用动态占据模型,对 2005 年至 2011 年间印度的大象破坏农作物数据进行了分析,以估计农作物破坏的发生情况,并将其潜在动态作为时空协变量的函数进行建模,同时考虑到冲突的不完全检测。冲突的检测概率始终<1.0,并且受到道路距离和海拔梯度的负面影响,在主要时段(每年不同的农业季节)平均为 0.08-0.56。农作物被破坏的概率范围从 0.29(SE 0.09)到 0.96(SE 0.04)。在主要时段 t 中被大象袭击的地点在下一个主要时段 t+1 中不会被袭击的概率随季节的不同而变化,并且受到降雨量和村庄密度的负面影响,以及与森林的距离的正面影响。降雨变化和与森林的距离的负面影响可以最好地解释在主要时段 t 中未被大象袭击的地点在下一个主要时段 t+1 中被袭击的概率的变化。通过我们对占据模型的新颖应用,我们从影响冲突观测的因素中分离出了冲突的时空驱动因素,从而可以更可靠地推断出观测到的冲突模式背后的机制。我们发现,与增加农作物可及性和可用性相关的因素(例如,与森林的距离和降雨模式)是大象破坏农作物动态的关键驱动因素。这种理解对于严格预测未来的冲突至关重要,这是在人类与野生动物互动不断增加的背景下进行有效冲突管理的关键要求。