Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023 Mar 17;18:341-348. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S394832. eCollection 2023.
Despite recommendations, assessment using spirometry or peak expiratory flow is insufficient in the clinical evaluation of suspected obstructive pulmonary disease. The aim was to investigate factors associated with performing spirometry or peak flow expiratory flow assessment.
Randomly selected subjects from the general population aged 50-65 completed a respiratory questionnaire with items about the history of previously performed spirometry or peak expiratory flow. The association between ever having had spirometry or peak expiratory flow performed was analyzed for smoking, age, sex, occupational exposures, dyspnea, wheeze, self-reported physician diagnosed asthma and COPD using multivariable logistic regression models. The results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).
Of the 1105 participants, 43.4% (n=479) had a history of previously performed spirometry or peak expiratory flow. Occupational exposure (OR 1.72, [95% CI] 1.30-2.27), wheeze (OR 2.29, 1.41-3.70), and dyspnea (OR 1.70, 1.11-2.60) were associated with previously performed spirometry. Compared to men, women had spirometry or peak expiratory flow performed less often (OR 0.67, 0.51-0.86). Neither current smoking (OR 0.83, 0.57-1.20) or former smoking (OR 1.27, 0.96-1.67) were associated with performed spirometry or peak expiratory flow.
We found no relation between smoking status and a history of previously performed spirometry or peak expiratory flow in a population-based sample of middle-aged people. This is surprising regarding the strong guidelines which highlight the importance for spirometry surveillance on current smokers due to their increased risk of lung disease. Male sex, respiratory symptoms and occupational exposures to air pollution were associated with previously performed spirometry or peak expiratory flow. The association with occupational exposure may be an effect of pre-employment screening and workplace surveillance, and the findings indicate that females do not receive the same attention regarding spirometry or peak expiratory flow.
尽管有相关建议,但是在疑似阻塞性肺疾病的临床评估中,使用肺活量计或呼气峰流速(peak expiratory flow,PEF)的评估仍然不够。本研究旨在探讨与进行肺活量计或 PEF 评估相关的因素。
从一般人群中随机选择 50-65 岁的受试者,完成一份包含既往进行过的肺活量计或 PEF 检查情况的呼吸问卷。使用多变量逻辑回归模型,分析吸烟、年龄、性别、职业暴露、呼吸困难、喘息、自我报告的医生诊断哮喘和 COPD 与是否进行过肺活量计或 PEF 检查之间的关系。结果以比值比(odds ratio,OR)及其 95%置信区间(95% confidence intervals,95%CI)表示。
在 1105 名参与者中,43.4%(n=479)有既往进行过的肺活量计或 PEF 检查的病史。职业暴露(OR 1.72,95%CI 1.30-2.27)、喘息(OR 2.29,1.41-3.70)和呼吸困难(OR 1.70,1.11-2.60)与既往进行过的肺活量计检查相关。与男性相比,女性进行肺活量计或 PEF 检查的频率较低(OR 0.67,0.51-0.86)。当前吸烟(OR 0.83,0.57-1.20)或既往吸烟(OR 1.27,0.96-1.67)均与进行过的肺活量计或 PEF 检查无关。
在一项基于人群的中年人群样本中,我们没有发现吸烟状况与既往进行过的肺活量计或 PEF 检查之间存在关联。这令人惊讶,因为强有力的指南强调了对当前吸烟者进行肺活量计监测的重要性,因为他们患肺部疾病的风险增加。男性、呼吸道症状和职业性暴露于空气污染与既往进行过的肺活量计或 PEF 检查相关。与职业暴露的关联可能是入职前筛查和工作场所监测的结果,并且研究结果表明,女性在进行肺活量计或 PEF 检查方面没有得到同样的重视。