Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tomography. 2023 Feb 21;9(2):459-474. doi: 10.3390/tomography9020038.
Current diagnostic criteria for myelofibrosis are largely based on bone marrow (BM) biopsy results. However, these have several limitations, including sampling errors. Explorative studies have indicated that imaging might form an alternative for the evaluation of disease activity, but the heterogeneity in BM abnormalities complicates the choice for the optimal technique. In our prospective diagnostic pilot study, we aimed to visualize all BM abnormalities in myelofibrosis before and during ruxolitinib treatment using both PET/CT and MRI. A random sample of patients was scheduled for examinations at baseline and after 6 and 18 months of treatment, including clinical and laboratory examinations, BM biopsies, MRI (T1-weighted, Dixon, dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)) and PET/CT ([O]water, [F]NaF)). At baseline, all patients showed low BM fat content (indicated by T1-weighted MRI and Dixon), increased BM blood flow (as measured by [O]water PET/CT), and increased osteoblastic activity (reflected by increased skeletal [F]NaF uptake). One patient died after the baseline evaluation. In the others, BM fat content increased to various degrees during treatment. Normalization of BM blood flow (as reflected by [O]water PET/CT and DCE-MRI) occurred in one patient, who also showed the fastest clinical response. Vertebral [F]NaF uptake remained stable in all patients. In evaluable cases, histopathological parameters were not accurately reflected by imaging results. A case of sampling error was suspected. We conclude that imaging results can provide information on functional processes and disease distribution throughout the BM. Differences in early treatment responses were especially reflected by T1-weighted MRI. Limitations in the gold standard hampered the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy.
当前,骨髓活检结果是骨髓纤维化的主要诊断标准。然而,这些标准存在一些局限性,包括取样误差。探索性研究表明,影像学可能成为评估疾病活动的替代方法,但骨髓异常的异质性使选择最佳技术变得复杂。在我们的前瞻性诊断性试点研究中,我们旨在使用 PET/CT 和 MRI 来可视化骨髓纤维化在接受芦可替尼治疗前后的所有骨髓异常。随机抽取部分患者在基线和治疗 6 个月及 18 个月时进行检查,包括临床和实验室检查、骨髓活检、MRI(T1 加权、Dixon、动态对比增强(DCE))和 PET/CT([O]水、[F]NaF))。在基线时,所有患者的骨髓脂肪含量均较低(T1 加权 MRI 和 Dixon 提示),骨髓血流增加([O]水 PET/CT 测量),成骨细胞活性增加(骨骼[F]NaF 摄取增加反映)。一名患者在基线评估后死亡。在其余患者中,在治疗过程中骨髓脂肪含量增加到不同程度。一名患者的骨髓血流正常化([O]水 PET/CT 和 DCE-MRI 反映),并且该患者也表现出最快的临床反应。所有患者的椎体[F]NaF 摄取保持稳定。在可评估的病例中,影像学结果不能准确反映组织病理学参数。怀疑存在取样误差。我们得出的结论是,影像学结果可以提供有关整个骨髓功能过程和疾病分布的信息。T1 加权 MRI 尤其能反映早期治疗反应的差异。金标准的局限性阻碍了诊断准确性的评估。