Johnson A, Harkin S, Steward M W, Whaley K
University Department of Pathology, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, U.K.
Mol Immunol. 1987 Nov;24(11):1211-7. doi: 10.1016/0161-5890(87)90168-4.
We have studied complement-mediated prevention of precipitation (PIP) and solubilization of immune complexes (IC) formed with DNP19-BSA and murine monoclonal antibodies (MCAs) of different isotypes and affinities. PIP was effective for IC formed with IgG1 and IgM antibodies, but not for IgA MCA. For IgG1 MCAs, affinity appeared to exert a minor effect on PIP, and IC formed in antibody excess or at equivalence were retained in solution more readily than those formed in antigen excess. For IgM MCAs affinity and antigen-antibody ratio did not affect PIP. As PIP did not occur in Mg-EGTA, it was concluded that PIP was entirely classical pathway dependent. Solubilization of IC containing IgG1 MCAs occurred more rapidly and to a greater extent with low affinity antibodies and an inverse relationship between affinity and the extent of solubilization was observed. Complexes formed with IgG1 MCAs were solubilized relatively poorly when formed in antigen excess. In contrast, affinity and antigen-antibody ratio did not influence the rate and extent of solubilization of IC containing IgM MCAs. IC formed with IgG2b were solubilized rapidly whereas those formed with IgG2a or IgA were solubilized poorly. The relative contributions of the classical and the alternative pathways to solubilization varied with each antibody and the effect of antigen-antibody ratio on these relative contributions was inconsistent.
我们研究了补体介导的沉淀抑制作用(PIP)以及用二硝基苯-19-牛血清白蛋白(DNP19-BSA)与不同亚型和亲和力的鼠单克隆抗体(MCA)形成的免疫复合物(IC)的溶解情况。PIP对由IgG1和IgM抗体形成的IC有效,但对IgA MCA形成的IC无效。对于IgG1 MCA,亲和力似乎对PIP影响较小,与在抗原过量时形成的IC相比,在抗体过量或等当量时形成的IC更容易保留在溶液中。对于IgM MCA,亲和力和抗原-抗体比例不影响PIP。由于在镁-乙二醇双乙酸盐(Mg-EGTA)中未发生PIP,得出结论:PIP完全依赖经典途径。含有IgG1 MCA的IC的溶解在低亲和力抗体作用下发生得更快且程度更大,并且观察到亲和力与溶解程度之间呈反比关系。当在抗原过量时形成,与IgG1 MCA形成的复合物溶解相对较差。相比之下,亲和力和抗原-抗体比例不影响含有IgM MCA的IC的溶解速率和程度。由IgG2b形成的IC迅速溶解,而由IgG2a或IgA形成的IC溶解较差。经典途径和替代途径对溶解的相对贡献因每种抗体而异,并且抗原-抗体比例对这些相对贡献的影响并不一致。