Moertel C G, Weiland L H, Nagorney D M, Dockerty M B
Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.
N Engl J Med. 1987 Dec 31;317(27):1699-701. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198712313172704.
In a long-term study of 150 unselected patients with carcinoid tumors of the appendix, we found that the neoplasms were usually less than 1.0 cm in largest dimension and discovered as an incidental finding during surgery performed for other reasons. Metastases were observed with none of the 127 appendiceal carcinoids less than 2.0 cm in largest dimension, with 3 of the 14 lesions greater than or equal to 2.0 cm but less than 3.0 cm in greatest dimension, and with 4 of the 9 lesions greater than or equal to 3.0 cm. Paradoxically, the patients with the larger tumors and metastases were younger than those with smaller and clinically benign tumors. The median age of patients with tumors greater than or equal to 2.0 cm was 31 years and that of those with metastases was 29 years, as compared with a median age of 42 years in patients with nonmetastasizing tumors less than 2.0 cm. We conclude that simple appendectomy is adequate treatment for patients with apparently localized tumors less than 2.0 cm in largest dimension. We have not observed any recurrences or metastases among 122 such patients followed for a median time of more than 26 years. Simple appendectomy is probably also appropriate treatment for lesions greater than or equal to 2.0 cm in elderly patients or in those at high operative risk. Right hemicolectomy seems justified only in young patients with tumors greater than or equal to 2.0 cm who have a low risk of operative morbidity or mortality. Vascular involvement and invasion of the mesoappendix are features that may favor a more radical approach.
在一项对150例未经挑选的阑尾类癌患者的长期研究中,我们发现这些肿瘤的最大直径通常小于1.0厘米,且是在因其他原因进行手术时偶然发现的。在127例最大直径小于2.0厘米的阑尾类癌中未观察到转移情况;在14例最大直径大于或等于2.0厘米但小于3.0厘米的病变中有3例发生转移;在9例最大直径大于或等于3.0厘米的病变中有4例发生转移。矛盾的是,肿瘤较大且发生转移的患者比肿瘤较小且临床为良性的患者更年轻。肿瘤大于或等于2.0厘米的患者中位年龄为31岁,发生转移的患者中位年龄为29岁,而最大直径小于2.0厘米且未发生转移的患者中位年龄为42岁。我们得出结论,对于最大直径小于2.0厘米的明显局限性肿瘤患者,单纯阑尾切除术是足够的治疗方法。在对122例此类患者进行了中位时间超过26年的随访中,我们未观察到任何复发或转移情况。对于老年患者或手术风险高的患者,单纯阑尾切除术可能也是大于或等于2.0厘米病变的合适治疗方法。右半结肠切除术似乎仅适用于手术并发症或死亡率风险低、肿瘤大于或等于2.0厘米的年轻患者。血管受累和阑尾系膜侵犯是可能支持采取更激进手术方法的特征。