Ranieri Veronica, Kamboj Sunjeev K, Edwards Sarah J L
Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy (STEaPP), University College London, London, United Kingdom.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Mar 16;3(3):e0001250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001250. eCollection 2023.
This aim of this scoping review is to map what is known about perceived coercion, perceived pressures and procedural justice within the context of the general population's experience of 'lockdowns' imposed by governments worldwide in response to the increased transmission of COVID-19. Arksey & O'Malley's (2005) framework for conducting scoping reviews was chosen. A sensitive search strategy was devised and conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science using the following search terms: (adherence OR acceptance OR agreement OR trust OR distrust OR compliance OR willing*) OR (perceived coerc* OR percept* coerc* OR pressure OR force OR influence OR control OR threat OR justice) AND (lockdown) AND (COVID OR SARS-CoV-2 OR COVID-19). The database search initially produced 41,628 articles to screen. A total of 40 articles were included in this review and the following five themes were identified from the studies: perceived acceptability and willingness to adhere to lockdown; perceived control during lockdown; perceived pressures arising from lockdown; perceived threat of sanction from others and the procedural (in)justice of lockdown. Our synthesis suggests that i) individuals experienced an initial willingness and tolerance of lockdown that lessened over time as perceptions of personal control decreased; ii) that social influences may pressure individuals to follow or break lockdown rules; and iii) that justifiability and proportionality together with individuals' perceptions of harm from COVID-19 may impact the extent to which individuals adhere to lockdown. Furthermore, the review found an absence of information regarding specific individual characteristics and circumstances that increase the likelihood of experiencing perceived coercion and its related constructs and highlights a need for a better understanding of the cultural and socioeconomic factors affecting perceptions of, and adherence to, lockdown.
本范围综述的目的是梳理在全球各国政府为应对新冠病毒传播增加而实施的“封锁”背景下，关于感知到的强制、感知到的压力和程序正义的已知情况。我们选择了阿克西和奥马利（2005年）进行范围综述的框架。我们设计并实施了一项敏感的检索策略，在PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中使用以下检索词进行检索：（依从性或接受度或同意或信任或不信任或合规性或意愿*）或（感知到的强制或感知强制*或压力或武力或影响或控制或威胁或正义）以及（封锁）和（新冠或严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2或2019冠状病毒病）。数据库检索最初产生了41628篇文章以供筛选。本综述共纳入40篇文章，并从这些研究中确定了以下五个主题：对封锁的感知可接受性和依从意愿；封锁期间的感知控制；封锁产生的感知压力；来自他人的制裁感知威胁以及封锁的程序（非）正义。我们的综合分析表明：i）随着个人控制感的下降，个体对封锁的初始意愿和耐受性会随着时间推移而降低；ii）社会影响可能会促使个体遵守或违反封锁规定；iii）合理性和相称性以及个体对新冠病毒危害的认知可能会影响个体遵守封锁的程度。此外，综述发现缺乏关于增加经历感知到的强制及其相关概念可能性的具体个体特征和情况的信息，并强调需要更好地理解影响对封锁的认知和遵守情况的文化和社会经济因素。
