• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响对临床试验实施信任的因素:来自加纳一项定性研究的利益相关者观点

Factors affecting trust in clinical trials conduct: Views of stakeholders from a qualitative study in Ghana.

作者信息

Chatio Samuel Tamti, Ganle John Kuumuori, Adongo Philip Baba, Beisel Ulrike

机构信息

Department of Social Science, Navrongo Health Research Centre, Navrongo, Ghana.

School of Public Health, Colleague of Health Sciences, University of Ghana, Legon, Accra, Ghana.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):e0001178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001178. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001178
PMID:36963012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10022335/
Abstract

Evidence exists that scientists' dehumanization and exploitation of people in the name of science led to suspicion and mistrust in clinical trials conduct. In Ghana, there are equally signs of public distrust in the conduct of biomedical research. Typical examples are the unsuccessful conduct of the Ebola vaccine trial and the initial refusal of parents to allow their children to receive the recently piloted malaria vaccine in Ghana. Therefore, this study explored participants' views on factors affecting trust in clinical trials conduct in Ghana. This was a cross-sectional exploratory study using qualitative research approach. Forty-eight in-depth interviews and Key informant interviews were conducted with stakeholders. Purposive sampling technique was used to select participants. All the interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded into themes using QSR Nvivo 12 software to aid thematic analysis. Overall, participants saw the need for the conduct of clinical trials in Ghana because clinical trial studies enable scientists to come out with effective medicines for the management of diseases. Pre-implementation factors such as inadequate stakeholder engagement, rumours and negative influence affected trust. Implementation factors such as perceived risks about clinical trials medicines, apprehensions on drawing and use of blood samples, poor informed consent administration and perceived no illness all negatively affected trust in clinical trials conduct. Trust is a fundamental factor affecting a successful conduct of clinical trials. Thus, there is need for collective efforts by all stakeholders including research institutions and clinical trial regulatory bodies to take the issue of trust in clinical trials conduct seriously.

摘要

有证据表明,科学家以科学之名对人的非人化和剥削导致了对临床试验开展的怀疑和不信任。在加纳,公众对生物医学研究开展同样存在不信任的迹象。典型例子是埃博拉疫苗试验开展失败,以及加纳家长最初拒绝让孩子接种最近试点的疟疾疫苗。因此,本研究探讨了参与者对影响加纳临床试验开展信任度因素的看法。这是一项采用定性研究方法的横断面探索性研究。对利益相关者进行了48次深入访谈和关键信息人访谈。采用目的抽样技术选择参与者。所有访谈都进行了录音、转录,并使用QSR Nvivo 12软件编码成主题,以辅助主题分析。总体而言,参与者认为在加纳开展临床试验有必要,因为临床试验研究能使科学家研发出治疗疾病的有效药物。实施前因素,如利益相关者参与不足、谣言和负面影响,影响了信任。实施因素,如对临床试验药物的感知风险、对采血和使用血样的担忧、知情同意管理不善以及感觉没有患病,都对临床试验开展的信任产生了负面影响。信任是影响临床试验成功开展的一个基本因素。因此,包括研究机构和临床试验监管机构在内的所有利益相关者需要共同努力,认真对待临床试验开展中的信任问题。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting trust in clinical trials conduct: Views of stakeholders from a qualitative study in Ghana.影响对临床试验实施信任的因素:来自加纳一项定性研究的利益相关者观点
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):e0001178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001178. eCollection 2023.
2
Knowledge and Perceptions about Clinical Trials and the Use of Biomedical Samples: Findings from a Qualitative Study in Rural Northern Ghana.关于临床试验及生物医学样本使用的知识与认知:加纳北部农村地区定性研究的结果
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 1;11(4):e0152854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152854. eCollection 2016.
3
Politics and trust in Ebola vaccine trials .政治与埃博拉疫苗试验中的信任
Politics Life Sci. 2020 Jul 17;39(1):38-55. doi: 10.1017/pls.2020.1.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Factors influencing willingness to participate in new drug trial studies: a study among parents whose children were recruited into these trials in northern Ghana.影响参与新药试验研究意愿的因素:一项针对加纳北部将孩子招募进此类试验的家长的研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Mar 3;9:139. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-1951-4.
6
Controversial Ebola vaccine trials in Ghana: a thematic analysis of critiques and rebuttals in digital news.加纳有争议的埃博拉疫苗试验:对数字新闻中批评与反驳的主题分析
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4618-8.
7
Community acceptability of Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention of morbidity and mortality in young children: A qualitative study in the Upper West Region of Ghana.社区对季节性疟疾化学预防儿童发病率和死亡率的接受度:加纳上西部地区的一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2019 May 17;14(5):e0216486. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216486. eCollection 2019.
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
9
Multiple-level stakeholder engagement in malaria clinical trials: addressing the challenges of conducting clinical research in resource-limited settings.疟疾临床试验中的多层次利益相关者参与:应对在资源有限环境中开展临床研究的挑战
Trials. 2018 Mar 22;19(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2563-1.
10
"It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa.“一切都关乎信任”:研究人员对南非生物样本库相关复杂性与争议的反思
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 10;17(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0140-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies to build trust in the conduct of clinical trials: Stakeholders' views in a qualitative study in Ghana.在临床试验开展过程中建立信任的策略:加纳一项定性研究中利益相关者的观点
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 8;5(4):e0003201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003201. eCollection 2025.
2
Knowledge and perception of a clinical trial among the participants: An experience from oral cholera vaccine study in Koshi Province, Nepal.参与者对临床试验的认知:来自尼泊尔科希省口服霍乱疫苗研究的经验。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024 Dec 31;20(1):2416760. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2416760. Epub 2024 Oct 15.

本文引用的文献

1
How the Health Rumor Misleads People's Perception in a Public Health Emergency: Lessons from a Purchase Craze during the COVID-19 Outbreak in China.在公共卫生突发事件中健康谣言如何误导人们的认知:来自中国 COVID-19 疫情期间抢购潮的教训。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 2;17(19):7213. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197213.
2
Malaria vaccine deployment in Africa: focus on Ghana.非洲疟疾疫苗的部署:以加纳为重点。
Ghana Med J. 2019 Jun;53(2):90-91. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v53i2.2.
3
Challenges in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting in randomized clinical trial studies: A systematic review.随机临床试验研究在设计、实施、分析和报告方面的挑战:一项系统综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Apr 30;33:37. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.37. eCollection 2019.
4
The willingness to participate in biomedical research involving human beings in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.在中低收入国家参与涉及人类的生物医学研究的意愿:系统评价。
Trop Med Int Health. 2019 Mar;24(3):264-279. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13195. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
5
Perceptions of and decision making about clinical trials in adolescent and young adults with Cancer: a qualitative analysis.青少年和青年癌症患者对临床试验的认知和决策:定性分析。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4515-2.
6
Controversial Ebola vaccine trials in Ghana: a thematic analysis of critiques and rebuttals in digital news.加纳有争议的埃博拉疫苗试验:对数字新闻中批评与反驳的主题分析
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):642. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4618-8.
7
Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Creswell John W Sage 320 £29 0761924426 0761924426 [Formula: see text].研究设计:定性、定量和混合方法研究路径 研究设计:定性、定量和混合方法研究路径 克雷斯韦尔·约翰·W 塞奇出版社 320页 29英镑 0761924426 0761924426 [公式:见正文]
Nurse Res. 2004 Sep 1;12(1):82-83. doi: 10.7748/nr.12.1.82.s2.
8
Toward a New Era of Trust and Transparency in Clinical Trials.迈向临床试验信任与透明的新时代。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 4;316(13):1353-1354. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14668.
9
Willingness to participate in health research: Tunisian survey.参与健康研究的意愿:突尼斯调查。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Aug 4;17(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0131-3.
10
Why Most Clinical Research Is Not Useful.为何大多数临床研究并无用处。
PLoS Med. 2016 Jun 21;13(6):e1002049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002049. eCollection 2016 Jun.