• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在临床试验开展过程中建立信任的策略:加纳一项定性研究中利益相关者的观点

Strategies to build trust in the conduct of clinical trials: Stakeholders' views in a qualitative study in Ghana.

作者信息

Chatio Samuel Tamti, Ganle John Kuumuori, Adongo Philip Baba, Ansah Patrick Odum, Nonterah Engelbert A, Mensah Nathan Kumasenu, Akazili James, Beisel Ulrike

机构信息

Navrongo Health Research Centre, Navrongo, Ghana.

School of Public Health, C.K Tedam University of Technology and Applied Sciences, Navrongo, Ghana.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 8;5(4):e0003201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003201. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0003201
PMID:40198690
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11978029/
Abstract

While clinical trials have evolved and improved over time producing significant advances in diagnosis, treatment and prevention of diseases, there are equally key challenges such as feasibility of some clinical trials and most importantly the issue of trust in the conduct of clinical trials. Thus, this study provides scientific evidence to address challenges associated with clinical trials conduct as well as a framework describing appropriate trust building strategies to guide the conduct of future clinical trial studies in Ghana and beyond. The study used qualitative research approach where 48 in-depth and Key informant interviews were conducted with participants between June and August, 2019. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and coded into themes using QSR Nvivo 12 software before thematic content analysis. The results revealed low level of trust in the conduct of clinical trials in Ghana. Participants recommended several trust building strategies to improve trust across the clinical trial cycle. Pre-implementation strategies such as effective stakeholder engagement and strengthening clinical trial regulatory bodies were recommended to build community trust. Implementation strategies such as effective monitoring, addressing issues of untrustworthiness and misconceptions regarding drawing and use of blood samples, improved informed consent procedures as well as post-implementation strategy such as timely feedback to clinical trial communities were highly recommended to build trust in clinical trials conduct. Trust is an important factor affecting clinical trials conduct especially in developing countries. The need to invest in national and community level trust-building activities through appropriate stakeholder engagement and effective monitoring systems by clinical trial regulatory bodies are critical strategies to improve trust in clinical trials conduct.

摘要

虽然随着时间的推移,临床试验不断发展和改进,在疾病的诊断、治疗和预防方面取得了重大进展,但也存在一些关键挑战,如某些临床试验的可行性,以及最重要的是临床试验实施过程中的信任问题。因此,本研究提供了科学证据,以应对与临床试验实施相关的挑战,并提供了一个框架,描述了适当的信任建立策略,以指导加纳及其他地区未来临床试验研究的开展。该研究采用定性研究方法,于2019年6月至8月期间对参与者进行了48次深入访谈和关键信息人访谈。访谈进行了录音、转录,并在进行主题内容分析之前,使用QSR Nvivo 12软件编码成主题。结果显示,加纳民众对临床试验实施的信任度较低。参与者推荐了几种信任建立策略,以在整个临床试验周期中提高信任度。建议采取实施前策略,如有效的利益相关者参与和加强临床试验监管机构,以建立社区信任。强烈推荐采取实施策略,如有效监测、解决关于血液样本采集和使用的不可信问题和误解、改进知情同意程序,以及实施后策略,如及时向临床试验社区反馈,以建立对临床试验实施的信任。信任是影响临床试验实施的一个重要因素,特别是在发展中国家。通过适当的利益相关者参与和临床试验监管机构的有效监测系统,在国家和社区层面投资于信任建设活动,是提高对临床试验实施信任度的关键策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949d/11978029/f9865e6f8425/pgph.0003201.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949d/11978029/2dd800af2817/pgph.0003201.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949d/11978029/f9865e6f8425/pgph.0003201.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949d/11978029/2dd800af2817/pgph.0003201.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/949d/11978029/f9865e6f8425/pgph.0003201.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Strategies to build trust in the conduct of clinical trials: Stakeholders' views in a qualitative study in Ghana.在临床试验开展过程中建立信任的策略:加纳一项定性研究中利益相关者的观点
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 8;5(4):e0003201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003201. eCollection 2025.
2
Factors affecting trust in clinical trials conduct: Views of stakeholders from a qualitative study in Ghana.影响对临床试验实施信任的因素:来自加纳一项定性研究的利益相关者观点
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):e0001178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001178. eCollection 2023.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Better engagement, better evidence: working in partnership with patients, the public, and communities in clinical trials with involvement and good participatory practice.更好的参与,更好的证据:在临床试验中与患者、公众和社区建立伙伴关系,实现良好的参与和实践。
Lancet Glob Health. 2025 Apr;13(4):e716-e731. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(24)00521-7.
5
Multiple-level stakeholder engagement in malaria clinical trials: addressing the challenges of conducting clinical research in resource-limited settings.疟疾临床试验中的多层次利益相关者参与:应对在资源有限环境中开展临床研究的挑战
Trials. 2018 Mar 22;19(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2563-1.
6
Knowledge and Perceptions about Clinical Trials and the Use of Biomedical Samples: Findings from a Qualitative Study in Rural Northern Ghana.关于临床试验及生物医学样本使用的知识与认知:加纳北部农村地区定性研究的结果
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 1;11(4):e0152854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152854. eCollection 2016.
7
Barriers and strategies to improve vaccine adverse events reporting: views from health workers and managers in Northern Ghana.改善疫苗不良事件报告的障碍与策略:来自加纳北部卫生工作者和管理人员的观点
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Feb 26;3(1):e001464. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001464. eCollection 2025 Jan.
8
Rules of engagement: perspectives on stakeholder engagement for genomic biobanking research in South Africa.参与规则:南非基因组生物样本库研究中利益相关者参与的视角
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0252-y.
9
Regulation of community advisory boards during conduct of clinical trials in Uganda: a qualitative study involving stakeholders.乌干达开展临床试验期间社区咨询委员会的监管:一项涉及利益攸关方的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09136-w.
10
Healthcare stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis.医疗保健利益相关者对影响重症监护远程医疗(CCT)实施因素的看法和经验:定性证据综合分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 18;2(2):CD012876. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012876.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors affecting trust in clinical trials conduct: Views of stakeholders from a qualitative study in Ghana.影响对临床试验实施信任的因素:来自加纳一项定性研究的利益相关者观点
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):e0001178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001178. eCollection 2023.
2
COVID-19 Pandemic, a War to be Won: Understanding its Economic Implications for Africa.新冠疫情:一场必须打赢的战争——了解其对非洲的经济影响
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Jun;18(3):325-328. doi: 10.1007/s40258-020-00580-x.
3
Breaking the chain of infection.
打破感染链。
J Perioper Pract. 2020 Apr;30(4):83-84. doi: 10.1177/1750458920914256.
4
Challenges in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting in randomized clinical trial studies: A systematic review.随机临床试验研究在设计、实施、分析和报告方面的挑战:一项系统综述。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Apr 30;33:37. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.37. eCollection 2019.
5
A Qualitative Study Exploring Barriers and Facilitators of Enrolling Underrepresented Populations in Clinical Trials and Biobanking.一项探索临床试验和生物样本库中纳入代表性不足人群的障碍与促进因素的定性研究。
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2019 Apr 30;7:74. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00074. eCollection 2019.
6
Factors affecting patient participation in clinical trials in Ireland: A narrative review.影响爱尔兰患者参与临床试验的因素:一项叙述性综述。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Mar 2;3:23-31. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.01.002. eCollection 2016 Aug 15.
7
The evolution of clinical trials: Can we address the challenges of the future?临床试验的演变:我们能否应对未来的挑战?
Clin Trials. 2018 Feb;15(1_suppl):27-32. doi: 10.1177/1740774518755058.
8
10 Best resources for community engagement in implementation research.实施研究中社区参与的 10 大最佳资源。
Health Policy Plan. 2017 Dec 1;32(10):1457-1465. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czx123.
9
Communicating Risks and Benefits in Informed Consent for Research: A Qualitative Study.研究知情同意中的风险与获益沟通:一项定性研究。
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017 Sep 20;4:2333393617732017. doi: 10.1177/2333393617732017. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.
10
Trust me, I'm a researcher!: The role of trust in biomedical research.相信我,我是一名研究人员!:信任在生物医学研究中的作用。
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Mar;20(1):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9721-6.