• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚太地区社区参与土壤传播蠕虫病卫生服务研究的系统评价。

Community engagement in health services research on soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Asia Pacific region: Systematic review.

作者信息

Naing Cho, Tung Wong Siew, Htet Norah Htet, Aung Htar Htar, Whittaker Maxine A

机构信息

Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia.

School of Medicine, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Mar 22;3(3):e0001694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001694. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001694
PMID:36963099
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10032488/
Abstract

The research question was what studies are available that have assessed community engagement in the health services research on soil-transmitted helminths? We aimed to synthesise evidence on how communities were engaged in health services research on soil-transmitted helminths in low-and-middle-income countries of the Asia-Pacific Region. We focused on this region because soil-transmitted helminths are endemic, and their burden is significant in this region. This review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist. Relevant studies were searched in health-related databases including PubMed, Ovid, and Google Scholar. We selected studies based on the selection criteria set for this review. We collected textual information about the type of health services research, the degree of community engagement, the research phases involved, and the barriers/enablers affecting community engagement in research since they are pertinent to our review question and objective. Ten studies from seven countries in the Asia Pacific region were identified for this review. Albeit with variation in the extent of their involvement, various forms of communities/groups within communities were included such as Aboriginal communities, local communities, school children and their parents, school teachers and headmasters of schools, heads of villages, religious leaders, and so on. Overall, community engagement in health services research focused on of soil-transmitted helminths was limited. Six studies (60%) had collaboration at 'developing methodology', mainly through an explanation of the objectives of the study or study process to be conducted. Seven studies (70%) revealed community participation in soil-transmitted helminths at the "data collection" stage. Only one study (10%) documented that a community leader was involved as a co-author, reflecting an involvement in 'report writing' and further 'dissemination'. Findings suggest that there were various forms of community engagement in various aspects of the health services research context. Overall, there was moderate level of participation, but there was insufficient information on the partnership between various stakeholders, which prevented in-depth analysis of the engagement. Future health services research on soil-transmitted helminth interventions needs to be carefully planned, well designed, grounded in principles of community engagement, and designed methodologically to allow in-depth participation by communities in all stages of the research.

摘要

研究问题是,有哪些已开展的研究评估了社区在土壤传播蠕虫病卫生服务研究中的参与情况?我们旨在综合关于亚太地区低收入和中等收入国家社区如何参与土壤传播蠕虫病卫生服务研究的证据。我们聚焦于该地区,是因为土壤传播蠕虫病呈地方性流行,且在该地区负担较重。本综述依据系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单进行。在包括PubMed、Ovid和谷歌学术在内的与健康相关的数据库中检索相关研究。我们根据为本综述设定的选择标准选取研究。我们收集了有关卫生服务研究类型、社区参与程度、所涉及的研究阶段以及影响社区参与研究的障碍/促进因素的文本信息,因为它们与我们的综述问题和目标相关。本次综述确定了来自亚太地区7个国家的10项研究。尽管参与程度有所不同,但纳入了社区内各种形式的社区/群体,如原住民社区、当地社区、学童及其家长、学校教师和校长、村长、宗教领袖等等。总体而言,社区在土壤传播蠕虫病卫生服务研究中的参与有限。六项研究(60%)在“制定方法”阶段有合作,主要是通过解释研究目的或拟开展的研究过程。七项研究(70%)显示社区在“数据收集”阶段参与了土壤传播蠕虫病研究。只有一项研究(10%)记录了社区领袖作为共同作者参与其中,这反映了在“报告撰写”以及进一步“传播”方面的参与。研究结果表明,在卫生服务研究背景的各个方面存在各种形式的社区参与。总体而言,参与程度为中等水平,但关于各利益相关者之间伙伴关系的信息不足,这妨碍了对参与情况进行深入分析。未来关于土壤传播蠕虫病干预措施的卫生服务研究需要精心规划、设计良好、以社区参与原则为基础,并在方法上进行设计,以便社区能够深入参与研究的各个阶段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5ee/10032488/35b692cd19e3/pgph.0001694.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5ee/10032488/cfc852c93e55/pgph.0001694.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5ee/10032488/953d996b737a/pgph.0001694.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5ee/10032488/35b692cd19e3/pgph.0001694.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5ee/10032488/cfc852c93e55/pgph.0001694.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5ee/10032488/953d996b737a/pgph.0001694.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5ee/10032488/35b692cd19e3/pgph.0001694.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Community engagement in health services research on soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Asia Pacific region: Systematic review.亚太地区社区参与土壤传播蠕虫病卫生服务研究的系统评价。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Mar 22;3(3):e0001694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001694. eCollection 2023.
2
Facilitators and barriers to engaging communities in health service research on dengue control in Indo-Pacific region: a systematic review.促进和阻碍亚太地区社区参与登革热控制卫生服务研究的因素:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):1924. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16845-8.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Community engagement in health services research on elimination of lymphatic filariasis: A systematic review.社区参与消除淋巴丝虫病的卫生服务研究:一项系统综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan 17;3(1):e0001226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001226. eCollection 2023.
6
Recovery schools for improving behavioral and academic outcomes among students in recovery from substance use disorders: a systematic review.改善物质使用障碍康复期学生行为和学业成果的康复学校:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;14(1):1-86. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.9. eCollection 2018.
7
The prevalence of tuberculosis, malaria and soil-transmitted helminth infection in minority indigenous people of Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.东南亚和西太平洋少数民族原住民中结核病、疟疾和土壤传播性蠕虫感染的流行情况:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 10;10(1):203. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01753-y.
8
Lessons from implementing mass drug administration for soil transmitted helminths among pre-school aged children during school based deworming program at the Kenyan coast.肯尼亚海岸地区在学校驱虫计划中对学龄前儿童实施针对土源性蠕虫的群体药物给药的经验教训。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Jun 14;17(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4481-7.
9
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Interventions to improve disposal of child faeces for preventing diarrhoea and soil-transmitted helminth infection.改善儿童粪便处理以预防腹泻和土壤传播的蠕虫感染的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 24;9(9):CD011055. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011055.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Making implementation science more real.使实施科学更具现实性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jun 25;22(1):178. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01661-2.
2
Description of global innovative methods in developing the WHO Community Engagement Package.描述全球创新方法在开发世界卫生组织社区参与包中的应用。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 7;12(6):e063144. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063144.
3
Lessons from community participation in primary health care and water resource governance in South Africa: a narrative review.南非初级卫生保健和水资源治理中社区参与的经验教训:叙事性回顾。
Glob Health Action. 2022 Jan 1;15(1):2004730. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2021.2004730.
4
Risk profiling and efficacy of albendazole against the hookworms and in Cambodia to support control programs in Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific.阿苯达唑针对柬埔寨钩虫的风险评估及疗效,以支持东南亚和西太平洋地区的防控项目。
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Aug 26;16:100258. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100258. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
Impact of the "BALatrine" Intervention on Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infections in Central Java, Indonesia: A Pilot Study.“BAL 厕所”干预措施对印度尼西亚中爪哇土壤传播蠕虫感染的影响:一项试点研究。
Trop Med Infect Dis. 2019 Dec 6;4(4):141. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed4040141.
6
Community perceptions of mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminthiasis and schistosomiasis in selected schools in the Philippines.社区对菲律宾部分学校内进行大规模驱虫治疗土源性线虫病和血吸虫病的看法。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2019 Oct 8;8(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s40249-019-0595-8.
7
High prevalence of ascariasis on two coral atolls in the Solomon Islands.所罗门群岛两个珊瑚环礁上蛔虫病的高流行率。
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Apr 1;112(4):193-199. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/try041.
8
Narratives of community engagement: a systematic review-derived conceptual framework for public health interventions.社区参与叙事:公共卫生干预措施的系统评价衍生概念框架
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 11;17(1):944. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4958-4.
9
The global burden of disease study 2013: What does it mean for the NTDs?《2013年全球疾病负担研究:对被忽视热带病意味着什么?》
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Aug 3;11(8):e0005424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005424. eCollection 2017 Aug.
10
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.