• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进和阻碍亚太地区社区参与登革热控制卫生服务研究的因素:系统评价。

Facilitators and barriers to engaging communities in health service research on dengue control in Indo-Pacific region: a systematic review.

机构信息

College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Queensland, Australia.

School of Medicine, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):1924. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16845-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-023-16845-8
PMID:37798703
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10552252/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dengue is a public health problem in the Indo-Pacific countries. There are concerns over the facilitators and barriers to community engagement in health service research aimed at dengue control. The objective of his study was to identify and synthesize facilitators and barriers to community engagement in health service research aimed at dengue control.

METHODOLOGY

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist was used to perform this review. Health-related databases including PubMed, Ovid, and Google Scholar were searched for relevant studies. A consolidated framework with five domains was developed after undertaking a six-phase reflective thematic assessment of the data.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were identified, spanning eight low-and middle-income countries of the Indo-Pacific region including Cambodia, India, Indonesia, Myanmar, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and Vietnam. The studies in this review covered the period from 2002 to 2021. A broad range of study designs and objectives were revealed across these 13 studies. An array of communities such as the local government, project-related health staff, local health services staff, community leaders, local communities/residences/general public, heads of households, community health volunteers, school teachers, and schoolchildren participated in these dengue related studies. The five Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains of 'intervention characteristics', 'inner setting', 'outer setting',' individual characteristics', and 'program implementations' were used to identify and describe barriers and facilitators.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate a range of barriers and facilitators to community engagement in dengue control in the selected LMIC in the Indo-Pacific countries. Future health services research on dengue control approaches should be carefully planned, methodologically constructed, aligned with community engagement principles, and involve considerable community participation at all stages of the research.

摘要

背景

登革热是印度-太平洋国家的一个公共卫生问题。人们对社区参与旨在控制登革热的卫生服务研究的促进因素和障碍存在担忧。本研究的目的是确定并综合分析旨在控制登革热的社区参与卫生服务研究的促进因素和障碍。

方法

本研究使用了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单。在对数据进行六个阶段的反思性主题评估后,开发了一个包含五个领域的综合框架,从包括 PubMed、Ovid 和 Google Scholar 在内的健康相关数据库中搜索了相关研究。

结果

确定了 13 项研究,涵盖了印度-太平洋地区的 8 个低收入和中等收入国家,包括柬埔寨、印度、印度尼西亚、缅甸、菲律宾、斯里兰卡、泰国和越南。本研究中的研究涵盖了 2002 年至 2021 年期间。这 13 项研究的设计和目标各不相同。一系列社区,如地方政府、与项目相关的卫生人员、当地卫生服务人员、社区领导、当地社区/住所/公众、户主、社区卫生志愿者、学校教师和学童,都参与了这些与登革热相关的研究。使用“实施研究综合框架”(CFIR)的五个领域,即“干预措施特征”、“内部环境”、“外部环境”、“个体特征”和“方案实施”,来识别和描述障碍和促进因素。

结论

研究结果表明,在所选择的印度-太平洋国家的低收入和中等收入国家中,社区参与登革热控制存在一系列障碍和促进因素。未来关于登革热控制方法的卫生服务研究应精心计划、方法上合理构建、符合社区参与原则,并在研究的所有阶段都有相当多的社区参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2383/10552252/7591af09e9f9/12889_2023_16845_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2383/10552252/89cb9fd338d5/12889_2023_16845_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2383/10552252/7591af09e9f9/12889_2023_16845_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2383/10552252/89cb9fd338d5/12889_2023_16845_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2383/10552252/7591af09e9f9/12889_2023_16845_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Facilitators and barriers to engaging communities in health service research on dengue control in Indo-Pacific region: a systematic review.促进和阻碍亚太地区社区参与登革热控制卫生服务研究的因素:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 5;23(1):1924. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16845-8.
2
Community engagement in health services research on soil-transmitted helminthiasis in Asia Pacific region: Systematic review.亚太地区社区参与土壤传播蠕虫病卫生服务研究的系统评价。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Mar 22;3(3):e0001694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001694. eCollection 2023.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Barriers to Engaging Communities in a Dengue Vector Control Program: An Implementation Research in an Urban Area in Hanoi City, Vietnam.参与登革热媒介控制项目的社区的障碍:越南河内市一个城区的实施研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Apr;100(4):964-973. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0411.
5
Application of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to assess factors that may influence implementation of tobacco use treatment guidelines in the Viet Nam public health care delivery system.应用实施研究综合框架评估可能影响越南公共卫生保健系统中烟草使用治疗指南实施的因素。
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 28;12(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0558-z.
6
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of direct fruit and vegetables provision interventions in kindergartens and schools: a qualitative systematic review applying the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR).幼儿园和学校实施直接提供水果和蔬菜干预措施的障碍和促进因素:应用实施研究综合框架 (CFIR) 的定性系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Jan 31;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01246-8.
7
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of nutrition-related actions in school settings in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): a qualitative systematic review using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)学校环境中营养相关行动实施的障碍与促进因素:一项使用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)的定性系统评价
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Jun 27;4(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00454-y.
8
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of evidence-based task-sharing mental health interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review using implementation science frameworks.在中低收入国家实施基于证据的任务分担精神卫生干预措施的障碍和促进因素:使用实施科学框架的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 12;17(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01179-z.
9
Barriers to and Facilitators of the Implementation of a Micronutrient Powder Program for Children: A Systematic Review Based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.实施儿童微量营养素粉末方案的障碍和促进因素:基于实施研究综合框架的系统评价。
Nutrients. 2023 Dec 12;15(24):5073. doi: 10.3390/nu15245073.
10
Capitalizing on facilitators and addressing barriers when implementing active tuberculosis case-finding in six districts of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: a qualitative study with key stakeholders.利用促进因素并解决障碍,在越南胡志明市的六个区实施活动性肺结核病例发现:与主要利益攸关方的定性研究。
Implement Sci. 2021 May 19;16(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01124-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge, attitude and prevention practices toward dengue among the Mauritian population. A cross-sectional study.毛里求斯人群对登革热的认知、态度及预防措施。一项横断面研究。
Pathog Glob Health. 2025 May-Jun;119(3-4):111-121. doi: 10.1080/20477724.2025.2493995. Epub 2025 Apr 16.

本文引用的文献

1
What are the barriers and facilitators to polio vaccination and eradication programs? A systematic review.脊髓灰质炎疫苗接种及根除计划的障碍与促进因素有哪些?一项系统综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Nov 16;2(11):e0001283. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001283. eCollection 2022.
2
Barriers and facilitators to implementing community-based physical activity interventions: a qualitative systematic review.实施基于社区的身体活动干预的障碍和促进因素:定性系统评价。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Sep 7;18(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01177-w.
3
Developing Risk Assessment Criteria and Predicting High- and Low-Dengue Risk Villages for Strengthening Dengue Prevention Activities: Community Participatory Action Research, Thailand.
制定风险评估标准和预测高、低登革热风险村庄以加强登革热预防活动:泰国社区参与式行动研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2021 Jan-Dec;12:21501327211013298. doi: 10.1177/21501327211013298.
4
Revitalising community engagement and surveillance challenges for strengthening dengue control in Jodhpur, Western Rajasthan, India - A mixed method study.振兴社区参与和监测挑战,加强印度拉贾斯坦邦西部焦特布尔的登革热控制——一项混合方法研究。
J Infect Public Health. 2020 Nov;13(11):1755-1761. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
5
Community social capital on fighting dengue fever in suburban Surabaya, Indonesia: A qualitative study.印度尼西亚泗水郊区抗击登革热中的社区社会资本:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2017 Oct 13;4(4):374-377. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.10.003. eCollection 2017 Oct 10.
6
Dengue.登革热。
Lancet. 2019 Jan 26;393(10169):350-363. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32560-1.
7
Barriers to Engaging Communities in a Dengue Vector Control Program: An Implementation Research in an Urban Area in Hanoi City, Vietnam.参与登革热媒介控制项目的社区的障碍:越南河内市一个城区的实施研究。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Apr;100(4):964-973. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.18-0411.
8
Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of physical activity policies in schools: A systematic review.学校开展身体活动政策的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Prev Med. 2018 Feb;107:45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
9
A theoretical analysis of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of school-based physical activity policies in Canada: a mixed methods scoping review.加拿大学校体育活动政策实施的障碍与促进因素的理论分析:一项混合方法的范围综述
Implement Sci. 2017 Mar 27;12(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0570-3.
10
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.