• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙切口疝手术登记处(EVEREG)的数据质量验证:初步研究。

Data quality validation of the Spanish Incisional Hernia Surgery Registry (EVEREG): pilot study.

机构信息

General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital of Tarragona Joan XXIII, Tarragona, Spain.

General and Digestive Surgery Department, University Hospital Parc de Salut Mar., Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):665-670. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02782-3. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-023-02782-3
PMID:36964455
Abstract

PURPOSE

The Spanish Incisional Hernia Surgery Registry (EVEREG) was promoted by the Abdominal Wall Section of the Spanish Association of Surgeons, starting data collection in July 2012 and currently has more than 14,000 cases. The objective of this study was to validate the data collected through a pilot audit process.

METHODS

A sample of hospitals participating in the EVEREG registry since the beginning was selected. Patients registered in these centers in the 2012-2020 period were included. A stratified random sampling was carried out, with the inclusion of 10% of registered cases per center with a minimum of 20 cases per center. At each participating center, two researchers not belonging to the center undergoing the audit checked (on site or telematically) the concordance between the data in the registry and the data contained in the case history of each patient.

RESULTS

330 patients have been analyzed, out of a total of 2673 registered, in 9 participating centers. The average accuracy has been 95.7%. Incorrect data 1.5% and missing data 2.3% CONCLUSION: The group of pilot hospitals from this EVERG incisional hernia surgery registry shows a very high precision of 95.7%. The confirmation of these findings in all the centers participating in the registry will make it possible to guarantee the quality of the studies made and their comparability with other similar national registries.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

nnTrial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT03899012.

摘要

目的

西班牙切口疝手术登记处(EVEREG)由西班牙外科医生协会腹壁科发起,于 2012 年 7 月开始收集数据,目前已有超过 14000 例病例。本研究的目的是通过试点审核过程验证所收集的数据。

方法

选择自 EVEREG 登记处开始参与的一组医院。纳入这些中心在 2012-2020 年期间登记的患者。进行分层随机抽样,每个中心纳入登记病例的 10%,每个中心至少纳入 20 例。在每个参与中心,两名不属于正在审核中心的研究人员(现场或远程)检查登记处数据与每位患者病历中数据的一致性。

结果

在 9 个参与中心的 2673 例登记病例中,分析了 330 例患者。平均准确率为 95.7%。错误数据为 1.5%,缺失数据为 2.3%。

结论

来自 EVERG 切口疝手术登记处的试点医院组显示出非常高的准确率(95.7%)。在参与登记处的所有中心确认这些发现,将能够保证所进行研究的质量及其与其他类似国家登记处的可比性。

试验注册

nn试验注册号:ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT03899012。

相似文献

1
Data quality validation of the Spanish Incisional Hernia Surgery Registry (EVEREG): pilot study.西班牙切口疝手术登记处(EVEREG)的数据质量验证:初步研究。
Hernia. 2023 Jun;27(3):665-670. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02782-3. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
2
Risk factors for bad outcomes in incisional hernia repair: Lessons learned from the National Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG).切口疝修补术不良预后的危险因素:从国家切口疝注册登记处(EVEREG)获得的经验教训。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2018 Aug-Sep;96(7):436-442. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 May 10.
3
Initial results of the National Registry of Incisional Hernia.国家切口疝登记处的初步结果。
Cir Esp. 2016 Dec;94(10):595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
4
Early outcomes of component separation techniques: an analysis of the Spanish registry of incisional Hernia (EVEREG).组件分离技术的早期结果:西班牙切口疝登记处(EVEREG)的分析。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1573-1580. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02449-x. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
5
Incisional hernia recurrence after open elective repair: expertise in abdominal wall surgery matters.开放择期修补术后切口疝复发:腹壁手术专业技能至关重要。
BMC Surg. 2019 Aug 7;19(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0569-6.
6
Comment to: "Early outcomes of component separation techniques: an analysis of the Spanish registry of incisional Hernia (EVEREG)".对《腹壁疝修补术的早期结果:西班牙腹壁疝登记研究(EVEREG)分析》的评论
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):657-660. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02490-w. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
7
Comment to: Early outcomes of component separation techniques: an analysis of the Spanish registry of incisional hernia (EVEREG)-Author's reply.对《腹壁分层分离技术的早期疗效:西班牙切口疝登记研究(EVEREG)分析》的评论——作者回复
Hernia. 2022 Apr;26(2):661-662. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02515-4. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
8
Parestomal hernia repair. Prospective observational study based on the Spanish Registry of Incisional Hernia (EVEREG).造口旁疝修补术。基于西班牙切口疝登记处(EVEREG)的前瞻性观察研究。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2021 Aug-Sep;99(7):527-534. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2021.06.016. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
9
Abdominal wall hernia surgery in The Netherlands: a national survey.荷兰腹壁疝手术:一项全国性调查。
Hernia. 2020 Jun;24(3):601-611. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02048-x. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
10
Comparison of Mesh Fixation Techniques in Elective Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Hernia-ReliaTack™ v ProTack™ (TACKoMesh) - A double-blind randomised controlled trial.择期腹腔镜切口疝修补术中Mesh固定技术的比较——ReliaTack™与ProTack™(TACKoMesh)——一项双盲随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 11;18(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0378-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of polypropylene meshes with embedded silver ions in ventral hernia repair: can they be used in different grades of contamination?聚丙烯网片嵌入银离子在腹疝修补中的分析:它们能否用于不同污染程度的情况?
Hernia. 2025 Sep 3;29(1):271. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03450-4.
2
Use of a New Silver-Impregnated Mesh for Incisional Hernia Surgery With Clean-Contaminated Wounds. First Case Series Results.新型含银网片在清洁-污染切口疝手术中的应用:首例病例系列研究结果
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jul 29;4:14786. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14786. eCollection 2025.
3
Simultaneous incisional hernia repair and colorectal surgery: one or two-step procedure?

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the Validity and Cover Rate of the National Swedish Hernia Register.评估瑞典国家疝气登记处的有效性和覆盖率。
Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Dec 16;13:1129-1134. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S335765. eCollection 2021.
2
Evaluation of data quality in the Spanish EURECCA Esophagogastric Cancer Registry.西班牙 EURECCA 食管胃交界癌登记处的数据质量评估。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;47(12):3081-3087. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.04.025. Epub 2021 Apr 25.
3
Use of real-world registry data: a hernia mesh example.真实世界注册研究数据的应用:疝修补网片实例
同期切口疝修补术和结直肠手术:一步法还是两步法?
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2321-2332. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03164-z. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
Hernia. 2020 Jun;24(3):587-590. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02085-6. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
4
Data quality audit of a clinical quality registry: a generic framework and case study of the Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry.临床质量登记处的数据质量审核:通用框架及澳大利亚和新西兰髋部骨折登记处案例研究
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Jul 17;8(3):e000490. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000490. eCollection 2019.
5
Comparing routine administrative data with registry data for assessing quality of hospital care in patients with inguinal hernia.比较常规行政数据和登记数据,以评估腹股沟疝患者的医院护理质量。
Hernia. 2020 Feb;24(1):143-151. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02009-4. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
6
Initial results of the National Registry of Incisional Hernia.国家切口疝登记处的初步结果。
Cir Esp. 2016 Dec;94(10):595-602. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
7
External review and validation of the Swedish national inpatient register.瑞典全国住院患者登记处的外部审查和验证。
BMC Public Health. 2011 Jun 9;11:450. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-450.
8
Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness.癌症登记处数据质量评估:原则与方法。第一部分:可比性、有效性和及时性。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Mar;45(5):747-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.032. Epub 2008 Dec 29.
9
Incisional hernia repair in Sweden 2002.2002年瑞典的切口疝修补术
Hernia. 2006 Jun;10(3):258-61. doi: 10.1007/s10029-006-0084-4. Epub 2006 Mar 23.