• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

只见树木不见森林?如何通过外向和以自我为中心的取向来弥合绿色差距,尽管这种做法可能无助于事。

Seeing past the tip of your own nose? How outward and self-centred orientations could contribute to closing the green gap despite helplessness.

机构信息

Centre of Social and Psychological Sciences, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská Cesta 9, 841 04, Bratislava, Slovakia.

Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, Lipová 41a, 602 00, Brno-střed, Czech Republic.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2023 Mar 24;11(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01128-z.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-023-01128-z
PMID:36964636
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10037357/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The present study explored moderators of the relation between environmental concerns and pro-environmental behaviour that could help close the green gap.

METHODS

A sample of 500 individuals (250 women) participated in the study. Apart from socio-demographic characteristics, participants answered questions about their environmental concerns and pro-environmental behaviour, collectivism and individualism, time orientation and emotional responses to climate change.

RESULTS

Our results corroborate the view that collectivism, future orientation and prosocial tendencies may form a single component of outward orientation, while individualism and immediate orientation form self-centred orientation. Generally, outwardly oriented individuals and those less self-centred reported more pro-environmental behaviour. However, strongly self-centred individuals, even when reporting elevated helplessness, showed increased involvement in pro-environmental behaviour once their concerns were high.

CONCLUSIONS

The study contributes to the literature by pointing out that both outward and self-centred orientations have the potential to insulate individuals against the negative effect helplessness may have on pro-environmental behaviour. This could inform strategies that would both prompt individuals already concerned to act and arouse more concern among those who are not yet preoccupied with climate change.

摘要

背景

本研究探讨了环境关注与亲环境行为之间关系的调节因素,这些因素可以帮助缩小“绿色差距”。

方法

本研究共有 500 名参与者(250 名女性)参与。除了社会人口统计学特征外,参与者还回答了关于他们的环境关注、亲环境行为、集体主义和个人主义、时间取向以及对气候变化的情绪反应的问题。

结果

我们的结果证实了这样一种观点,即集体主义、未来取向和亲社会倾向可能构成外向性的一个单一组成部分,而个人主义和即时取向则构成自我中心的取向。一般来说,外向型个体和自我中心程度较低的个体报告的亲环境行为较多。然而,即使表现出较高的无助感,强烈的自我中心个体一旦关注程度较高,就会更多地参与亲环境行为。

结论

本研究通过指出外向和自我中心的取向都有可能使个人免受无助感对亲环境行为的负面影响,为文献做出了贡献。这可以为那些已经关注的人提供行动的动力,并唤起那些尚未关注气候变化的人的更多关注。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c244/10037785/35f9ec038832/40359_2023_1128_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c244/10037785/59c582730d71/40359_2023_1128_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c244/10037785/35f9ec038832/40359_2023_1128_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c244/10037785/59c582730d71/40359_2023_1128_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c244/10037785/35f9ec038832/40359_2023_1128_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Seeing past the tip of your own nose? How outward and self-centred orientations could contribute to closing the green gap despite helplessness.只见树木不见森林?如何通过外向和以自我为中心的取向来弥合绿色差距,尽管这种做法可能无助于事。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Mar 24;11(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01128-z.
2
Emotional drivers of the vaccination hesitancy and refusal: A dataset from Slovakia.疫苗接种犹豫和拒绝的情感驱动因素:来自斯洛伐克的数据集。
Data Brief. 2023 Apr;47:108980. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.108980. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
3
You before me: How vertical collectivism and feelings of threat predicted more socially desirable behaviour during COVID-19 pandemic.在我之前的你:垂直集体主义和威胁感如何预测在新冠疫情期间更符合社会期望的行为。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Mar 19:1-12. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03003-3.
4
Individualism-Collectivism, Social Self-Control and Adolescent Substance Use and Risky Sexual Behavior.个人主义-集体主义、社会自我控制与青少年物质使用及危险性行为
Subst Use Misuse. 2018 Jun 7;53(7):1057-1067. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1392983. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
5
Fear trumps the common good: Psychological antecedents of vaccination attitudes and behaviour.恐惧胜于公益:疫苗态度和行为的心理前因。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2022 Jul;227:103606. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103606. Epub 2022 May 4.
6
Is individualism-collectivism associated with self-control? Evidence from Chinese and U.S. samples.个体主义-集体主义与自我控制有关吗?来自中美样本的证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 19;13(12):e0208541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208541. eCollection 2018.
7
Individual differences in individualism and collectivism predict ratings of virtual cities' liveability and environmental quality.个人主义和集体主义方面的个体差异预示着对虚拟城市宜居性和环境质量的评级。
J Gen Psychol. 2014;141(4):348-72. doi: 10.1080/00221309.2014.938721.
8
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
9
How does the moral self-concept relate to prosocial behaviour? Investigating the role of emotions and consistency preference.道德自我概念与亲社会行为有何关系?探究情绪和一致性偏好的作用。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Aug;36(5):894-911. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2022.2067133. Epub 2022 May 10.
10
Stress influences environmental donation behavior in men.压力会影响男性的环境捐赠行为。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2016 Jan;63:311-9. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.10.017. Epub 2015 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Culture, goal orientation and achievement of vocational college students.高职院校学生的文化、目标导向与成就
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 22;16:1639938. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1639938. eCollection 2025.
2
Divergent effects of environmental concern and risk perception on pro-environmental intention: an international study across 17 countries.环境关切与风险认知对亲环境意图的不同影响:一项涵盖17个国家的国际研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 5;15(1):7766. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91677-7.
3
Emotional drivers of the vaccination hesitancy and refusal: A dataset from Slovakia.

本文引用的文献

1
How are you holding up? Personality, cognitive and social predictors of a perceived shift in subjective well-being during COVID-19 pandemic.你近况如何?新冠疫情期间主观幸福感感知变化的人格、认知和社会预测因素。
Pers Individ Dif. 2022 Feb;186:111349. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111349. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
2
From values to climate action.从价值观到气候行动。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2021 Dec;42:102-107. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.04.010. Epub 2021 May 1.
3
When we are worried, what are we thinking? Anxiety, lack of control, and conspiracy beliefs amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.
疫苗接种犹豫和拒绝的情感驱动因素:来自斯洛伐克的数据集。
Data Brief. 2023 Apr;47:108980. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.108980. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
当我们感到担忧时,我们在想什么?新冠疫情期间的焦虑、失控感与阴谋论信念。
Appl Cogn Psychol. 2021 May-Jun;35(3):720-729. doi: 10.1002/acp.3798. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
4
Individualism and nationally determined contributions to climate change.个人主义与各国对气候变化的自主贡献。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jul 10;777:146076. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146076. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
5
Recycling Alone or Protesting Together? Values as a Basis for Pro-environmental Social Change Actions.独自回收还是共同抗议?价值观作为亲环境社会变革行动的基础。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 26;9:1229. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01229. eCollection 2018.
6
Cultural Variability in the Link Between Environmental Concern and Support for Environmental Action.环境关注与支持环境行动之间的联系存在文化变异性。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Oct;27(10):1331-1339. doi: 10.1177/0956797616660078. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
7
Promotion orientation explains why future-oriented people exercise and eat healthy: evidence from the two-factor consideration of future consequences-14 scale.促进定向解释了为什么面向未来的人会锻炼和健康饮食:来自未来后果-14 量表的双因素考虑的证据。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Oct;38(10):1272-87. doi: 10.1177/0146167212449362. Epub 2012 Jul 25.
8
The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation.不作为的巨龙:限制气候变化减缓和适应的心理障碍。
Am Psychol. 2011 May-Jun;66(4):290-302. doi: 10.1037/a0023566.
9
G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.G*Power 3:一款适用于社会科学、行为科学和生物医学科学的灵活的统计功效分析程序。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.