• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环境关切与风险认知对亲环境意图的不同影响:一项涵盖17个国家的国际研究

Divergent effects of environmental concern and risk perception on pro-environmental intention: an international study across 17 countries.

作者信息

Kikko Yuzuki, Ishigaki Tsukasa

机构信息

Graduate School of Economics and Management, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 5;15(1):7766. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91677-7.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-91677-7
PMID:40044758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11883006/
Abstract

Studies have demonstrated that pro-environmental behaviors vary across countries and are influenced by cultural values, environmental concerns (EC), and risk perception. Therefore, measures tailored to each country's culture must be implemented to effectively promote pro-environmental behaviors. This study analyzed the heterogeneity in the strength of the relationships among the constructs in each country. Using structural equation modeling to validate three hypotheses about constructs with respect to pro-environmental behaviors, this study investigated how EC and risk perception influenced pro-environmental intentions across 17 countries. It used the Environment IV dataset provided by the International Social Survey Program (ISSP, 2020). The results revealed that the influence of EC and risk perception on pro-environmental orientation differed from country to country, confirming the three hypotheses. This study offered a novel contribution to the literature as it uncovered the different mechanisms by which environmental knowledge influenced pro-environmental behavior compared with EC and risk perceptions. In addition, it quantitatively assessed how this effect differed across the 17 countries.

摘要

研究表明,亲环境行为因国家而异,并受到文化价值观、环境关切(EC)和风险认知的影响。因此,必须实施针对每个国家文化的措施,以有效促进亲环境行为。本研究分析了每个国家各构念之间关系强度的异质性。本研究使用结构方程模型来验证关于亲环境行为构念的三个假设,调查了环境关切和风险认知如何影响17个国家的亲环境意图。它使用了国际社会调查项目(ISSP,2020)提供的环境IV数据集。结果显示,环境关切和风险认知对亲环境取向的影响因国家而异,证实了这三个假设。本研究为文献做出了新的贡献,因为它揭示了与环境关切和风险认知相比,环境知识影响亲环境行为的不同机制。此外,它还定量评估了这种影响在17个国家之间的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/623f/11883006/dc12b2a3862e/41598_2025_91677_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/623f/11883006/18eeb4d90549/41598_2025_91677_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/623f/11883006/dc12b2a3862e/41598_2025_91677_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/623f/11883006/18eeb4d90549/41598_2025_91677_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/623f/11883006/dc12b2a3862e/41598_2025_91677_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Divergent effects of environmental concern and risk perception on pro-environmental intention: an international study across 17 countries.环境关切与风险认知对亲环境意图的不同影响:一项涵盖17个国家的国际研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 5;15(1):7766. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91677-7.
2
The mediating role of pro-environmental attitude and intention on the translation from climate change health risk perception to pro-environmental behavior.促进环境态度和意图在将气候变化健康风险感知转化为亲环境行为中的中介作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 29;14(1):9831. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60418-7.
3
(Mis)matched direct and moderating relationships among pro-environmental attitudes, environmental efficacy, and pro-environmental behaviors across and within 11 countries.在 11 个国家中,跨国家和国家内的亲环境态度、环境效能感和亲环境行为之间存在(不)匹配的直接和调节关系。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 18;19(6):e0304945. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304945. eCollection 2024.
4
Determinants of Farmers' Intention of Straw Recycling: A Comparison Analysis Based on Different Pro-Environmental Publicity Modes.农民秸秆回收意愿的决定因素:基于不同环保宣传模式的比较分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 28;18(21):11304. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111304.
5
Consumers' health risk-benefit perception of seafood and attitude toward the marine environment: Insights from five European countries.消费者对海鲜的健康风险-效益认知和对海洋环境的态度:来自五个欧洲国家的见解。
Environ Res. 2015 Nov;143(Pt B):11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.02.029. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
6
International Social Survey Program (ISSP) environment dataset modules: Open data and its applicability in PLS-SEM Research.
Data Brief. 2023 Apr 11;48:109126. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109126. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Influencing factors of consumers' buying intention of solar energy: a structural equation modeling approach.消费者购买太阳能意愿的影响因素:结构方程建模方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(11):30017-30032. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24286-w. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
8
How does environmental knowledge translate into pro-environmental behaviors?: The mediating role of environmental attitudes and behavioral intentions.环境知识如何转化为亲环境行为?环境态度和行为意愿的中介作用。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Aug 1;728:138126. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138126. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
9
Analysis of the ecological conservation behavior of farmers in payment for ecosystem service programs in eco-environmentally fragile areas using social psychology models.运用社会心理学模型分析生态环境脆弱地区生态服务付费项目中农民的生态保护行为。
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Apr 15;550:382-390. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.152. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
10
Moving towards novel and sustainable foods: Investigating consumers' intention to consume algae-based foods in a developing country.迈向新型可持续食品:探究发展中国家消费者食用藻类食品的意愿
Appetite. 2025 Feb 1;206:107801. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107801. Epub 2024 Dec 4.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of public environmental concern on environmental pollution: The moderating effect of government environmental regulation.公众环境关注对环境污染的影响:政府环境监管的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 17;18(8):e0290255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290255. eCollection 2023.
2
Seeing past the tip of your own nose? How outward and self-centred orientations could contribute to closing the green gap despite helplessness.只见树木不见森林?如何通过外向和以自我为中心的取向来弥合绿色差距,尽管这种做法可能无助于事。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Mar 24;11(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01128-z.
3
When Artificial Intelligence Voices Human Concerns: The Paradoxical Effects of AI Voice on Climate Risk Perception and Pro-Environmental Behavioral Intention.
当人工智能表达人类关切:人工智能语音对气候风险感知和环保行为意向的矛盾影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 20;20(4):3772. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043772.
4
Pro-Environmental Behavior in an Aging World: Evidence from 31 Countries.老龄化世界中的环保行为:来自 31 个国家的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;18(4):1748. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041748.
5
Environmental Risk Perception, Risk Culture, and Pro-Environmental Behavior.环境风险感知、风险文化与亲环境行为
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 7;17(5):1750. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051750.
6
Using individualism and collectivism to compare cultures--a critique of the validity and measurement of the constructs: comment on Oyserman et al. (2002).运用个人主义和集体主义来比较文化——对这些概念的有效性及衡量方法的批判:评奥伊泽曼等人(2002年)的研究
Psychol Bull. 2002 Jan;128(1):78-88. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.1.78.