1The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, New York, NY.
2Canisius College, Buffalo, NY.
J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2023 Mar 22;261(8):1238-1243. doi: 10.2460/javma.23.01.0016. Print 2023 Aug 1.
Friction can occur between veterinarians and their clients when they are not aligned on the goals of care for a pet and what constitutes the best outcome of a case. Veterinarians frequently concentrate on providing the diagnostic and treatment protocol that is perceived to result in the best medical outcome for their patient. Pet owners frequently consider a myriad of factors relating to the pet as well as how different diagnostic and treatment recommendations will affect individual family members and the family as a whole in both concrete and subjective terms. This misalignment can lead to veterinarians experiencing moral distress and families feeling guilt and shame about their pet's care decisions. In this paper we examine the interdependencies of families and their pets and the factors that pet owners may consider in making care decisions. These factors, adapted from the concept of Family Quality of Life as used in the human health field, can be divided into three domains including pet-centric factors, family-centric factors, and external factors. By better understanding that there are a multitude of considerations that influence owners' care decisions and communicating with owners in a nonjudgmental manner, veterinarians can more holistically support families, decrease their own moral distress, and arrive at diagnostic and treatment plans that represent the overall best approach for the family and the patient.
当兽医和他们的客户在宠物护理目标和病例最佳结果的定义上不一致时,可能会出现摩擦。兽医通常专注于提供被认为对患者最有利的诊断和治疗方案。宠物主人则经常考虑与宠物有关的各种因素,以及不同的诊断和治疗建议将如何在具体和主观层面上影响个别家庭成员和整个家庭。这种不一致可能导致兽医感到道德困境,而宠物主人则对宠物的护理决策感到内疚和羞耻。在本文中,我们研究了家庭及其宠物的相互依存关系,以及宠物主人在做出护理决策时可能考虑的因素。这些因素是从人类健康领域使用的“家庭生活质量”概念中改编而来,可以分为三个领域,包括以宠物为中心的因素、以家庭为中心的因素和外部因素。通过更好地理解影响主人护理决策的多种因素,并以非评判的方式与主人沟通,兽医可以更全面地支持家庭,减少自己的道德困境,并制定出代表家庭和患者整体最佳方法的诊断和治疗计划。