• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 MRI 定义的低位直肠癌的微创全直肠系膜切除术后,单吻合器吻合与双吻合器技术相比,吻合口漏的发生率更低。

Single-stapled anastomosis is associated with a lower anastomotic leak rate than double-stapled technique after minimally invasive total mesorectal excision for MRI-defined low rectal cancer.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy; IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Surgery. 2023 Jun;173(6):1367-1373. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2023.02.018
PMID:36967334
Abstract

BACKGROUND

After total mesorectal excision, distal rectal transection and anastomosis are critical for short-term, oncological, and functional outcomes, including anastomotic leak. A double-pursestring, single-stapled anastomosis avoids cross-stapling, overcoming the potential drawbacks of transabdominal rectal transection and double-stapled anastomosis. This study aims to compare the anastomotic leak rate in double-stapled and single-stapled anastomoses after minimally invasive total mesorectal excision for magnetic resonance imaging-defined low rectal cancer.

METHODS

Adult patients (>18 years old) undergoing minimally invasive total mesorectal excision for magnetic resonance imaging-defined low rectal cancer with a stapled low anastomosis (below 5 centimeters from the anal verge) between January 2010 and January 2022 at a single institution were allocated to 2 groups according to the anastomosis: double-stapled (abdominal stapled transection and double-stapled anastomosis) or single-stapled (transanal rectal transection and double-pursestring single-stapled anastomosis). The exclusion criteria were nonrestorative procedures or any type of manual anastomosis. The primary endpoint was the rate of 90-day clinical and radiologic anastomotic leak.

RESULTS

In total, 185 single-stapled and 458 double-stapled were included. Clinical and tumor characteristics were comparable between the groups. The 90-day anastomotic leak rate was significantly lower in the single-stapled group (6.48% vs 15.28%; P = .002), with similar rates of grade and timing. Thirty- and 90-day complication rates were higher in the double-stapled group (P = .0001; P = .02), with comparable Clavien-Dindo grades. At multivariable analysis, double-stapled anastomosis (P = .01), active smoking (P = .03), and the presence of comorbidities (P = .01) resulted as independent risk factors for an anastomotic leak.

CONCLUSION

Transanal transection and double-pursestring, single-stapled anastomosis were associated with a lower anastomotic leak rate after minimally invasive total mesorectal excision for magnetic resonance imaging-defined low rectal cancer.

摘要

背景

全直肠系膜切除术后,远端直肠横断和吻合术对于短期、肿瘤学和功能结果至关重要,包括吻合口漏。双荷包、单吻合钉吻合术避免了交叉吻合钉,克服了经腹直肠横断和双吻合钉吻合术的潜在缺点。本研究旨在比较经磁共振成像定义的低位直肠癌微创全直肠系膜切除术后双吻合钉和单吻合钉吻合的吻合口漏发生率。

方法

2010 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月,一家机构对经磁共振成像定义的低位直肠癌(距肛缘 5 厘米以下)行微创全直肠系膜切除,行吻合钉低位吻合术(以下简称低位吻合术)的成年患者(>18 岁),根据吻合方式分为两组:双吻合钉(腹部吻合钉横断和双吻合钉吻合)或单吻合钉(经肛门直肠横断和双荷包单吻合钉吻合)。排除标准为非修复性手术或任何类型的手工吻合术。主要终点为 90 天临床和影像学吻合口漏的发生率。

结果

共纳入 185 例单吻合钉组和 458 例双吻合钉组。两组的临床和肿瘤特征相似。单吻合钉组的 90 天吻合口漏发生率显著较低(6.48% vs 15.28%;P =.002),且吻合口漏的分级和发生时间相似。双吻合钉组的 30 天和 90 天并发症发生率较高(P =.0001;P =.02),且并发症分级相似。多变量分析显示,双吻合钉吻合术(P =.01)、主动吸烟(P =.03)和合并症存在(P =.01)是吻合口漏的独立危险因素。

结论

经肛门直肠横断和双荷包单吻合钉吻合术与经磁共振成像定义的低位直肠癌微创全直肠系膜切除术后吻合口漏发生率较低相关。

相似文献

1
Single-stapled anastomosis is associated with a lower anastomotic leak rate than double-stapled technique after minimally invasive total mesorectal excision for MRI-defined low rectal cancer.在 MRI 定义的低位直肠癌的微创全直肠系膜切除术后,单吻合器吻合与双吻合器技术相比,吻合口漏的发生率更低。
Surgery. 2023 Jun;173(6):1367-1373. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.02.018. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
2
Transanal Transection and Single-Stapled Anastomosis (TTSS): A comparison of anastomotic leak rates with the double-stapled technique and with transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for rectal cancer.经肛门全直肠系膜切除联合经肛门吻合(TTSS)与双吻合器技术和经肛门直肠全系膜切除术(TaTME)治疗直肠癌的吻合口漏率比较。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;47(12):3123-3129. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.08.002. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
3
[Efficacy of transanal hand-sewn reinforcement in low rectal stapled anastomosis in preventing anastomotic leak after transanal total mesorectal excision].经肛门手工缝合加固在经肛门全直肠系膜切除术后低位直肠吻合术中预防吻合口漏的疗效
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Jun 25;24(6):530-535. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20210408-00151.
4
IDEAL Stage 2a/b prospective cohort study of transanal transection and single-stapled anastomosis for rectal cancer.经肛门直肠肿瘤切除吻合术治疗直肠癌的 IDEAL Stage 2a/b 前瞻性队列研究。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Dec;25(12):2346-2353. doi: 10.1111/codi.16789. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
5
Transanal transection and single-stapling techniques are associated with shorter rectal cuff and lower urgency rate after pouch surgery compared with the double-stapled approach.经肛门直肠切断术和单吻合器技术与双吻合器方法相比,在 pouch 手术后直肠袖口较短,急迫性排便发生率较低。
Surgery. 2023 Oct;174(4):808-812. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.06.027. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
6
Anastomosis-Related Complications After Stapled Anastomosis With Reinforced Sutures in Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术吻合加固缝线吻合相关并发症:低位直肠癌的回顾性单中心研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Feb 1;65(2):246-253. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002016.
7
Comprehensive literature review of the outcome, modifications, and alternatives to double-stapled low pelvic colorectal anastomosis.对双吻合器低位直肠结肠吻合术的结果、改良和替代方法的全面文献回顾。
Surgery. 2022 Aug;172(2):512-521. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.02.019. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
8
[Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 25;25(6):522-530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210811-00321.
9
Can transanal tube placement after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma reduce anastomotic leakage rate? A single-institution prospective randomized study.经肛门管状引流在直肠癌前切除术后能否降低吻合口漏的发生率?单中心前瞻性随机研究。
World J Surg. 2011 Jun;35(6):1367-77. doi: 10.1007/s00268-011-1053-3.
10
Low anterior resection with transanal transection and single-stapled anastomosis: technical aspects and initial results.经肛门切除吻合术治疗低位直肠癌:技术要点与初步结果
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jun 5;39(1):85. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04646-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Achieving the perfect end-to-end single-stapled anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: technical aspects.直肠癌低位前切除术中实现完美的端端单吻合器吻合术:技术要点
Ann Coloproctol. 2025 Aug;41(4):361-366. doi: 10.3393/ac.2025.00472.0067. Epub 2025 Aug 21.
2
Controversies and Perspectives in the Current Management of Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer-A Systematic Review.局部晚期直肠癌患者当前管理中的争议与展望——一项系统综述
Life (Basel). 2025 Jun 25;15(7):1011. doi: 10.3390/life15071011.
3
Circular staplers and anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: meta-analysis.
圆形吻合器与结直肠手术中的吻合口漏:荟萃分析
BJS Open. 2025 Mar 4;9(2). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae170.
4
The Effect of Multifaceted Anastomotic Leakage Prevention ICG and SST for Lower Rectal Anastomosis.多层面吻合口漏预防 ICG 和 SST 对低位直肠吻合术的影响。
In Vivo. 2024 Nov-Dec;38(6):2973-2980. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13780.
5
Low anterior resection with transanal transection and single-stapled anastomosis: technical aspects and initial results.经肛门切除吻合术治疗低位直肠癌:技术要点与初步结果
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jun 5;39(1):85. doi: 10.1007/s00384-024-04646-3.
6
Total Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients: Where Do We Stand?局部晚期直肠癌患者的全新辅助治疗:我们处于何种地位?
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jul 29;24(15):12159. doi: 10.3390/ijms241512159.