• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

可信人工智能评估清单:综述与建议

The assessment list for trustworthy artificial intelligence: A review and recommendations.

作者信息

Radclyffe Charles, Ribeiro Mafalda, Wortham Robert H

机构信息

School of Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

Centre for Accountable, Responsible, and Transparent AI (ART-AI), University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Artif Intell. 2023 Mar 9;6:1020592. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1020592. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/frai.2023.1020592
PMID:36967834
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10034015/
Abstract

In July 2020, the European Commission's High-Level Expert Group on AI (HLEG-AI) published the Assessment List for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence (ALTAI) tool, enabling organizations to perform self-assessments of the fit of their AI systems and surrounding governance to the "7 Principles for Trustworthy AI." Prior research on ALTAI has focused primarily on specific application areas, but there has yet to be a comprehensive analysis and broader recommendations aimed at proto-regulators and industry practitioners. This paper therefore starts with an overview of this tool, including an assessment of its strengths and limitations. The authors then consider the success by which the ALTAI tool is likely to be of utility to industry in improving understanding of the risks inherent in AI systems and best practices to mitigate such risks. It is highlighted how research and practices from fields such as (ESG) can be of benefit for addressing similar challenges in ethical AI development and deployment. Also explored is the extent to which the tool is likely to be successful in being taken up by industry, considering various factors pertaining to its likely adoption. Finally, the authors also propose recommendations applicable internationally to similar bodies to the HLEG-AI regarding the gaps needing to be addressed between high-level principles and practical support for those on the front-line developing or commercializing AI tools. In all, this work provides a comprehensive analysis of the ALTAI tool, as well as recommendations to relevant stakeholders, with the broader aim of promoting more widespread adoption of such a tool in industry.

摘要

2020年7月,欧盟委员会人工智能高级专家组(HLEG-AI)发布了可信人工智能评估清单(ALTAI)工具,使各组织能够对其人工智能系统及周边治理与“可信人工智能7项原则”的契合度进行自我评估。此前关于ALTAI的研究主要集中在特定应用领域,但尚未有针对初步监管者和行业从业者的全面分析及更广泛建议。因此,本文首先概述该工具,包括对其优势和局限性的评估。作者随后考量ALTAI工具在帮助行业提高对人工智能系统固有风险的认识以及缓解此类风险的最佳实践方面可能具有的效用。文中强调了诸如(ESG)等领域的研究和实践如何有助于应对道德人工智能开发和部署中的类似挑战。还探讨了考虑到与工具可能被采用相关的各种因素,该工具在被行业采用方面可能取得的成功程度。最后,作者还针对HLEG-AI这样的类似机构在国际上提出建议,指出在为一线开发或商业化人工智能工具的人员提供的高层原则与实际支持之间需要填补的差距。总之,这项工作对ALTAI工具进行了全面分析,并向相关利益相关者提出了建议,其更广泛的目标是促进该工具在行业中得到更广泛的采用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9e8/10034015/8a4f6f590909/frai-06-1020592-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9e8/10034015/4044174b3574/frai-06-1020592-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9e8/10034015/8a4f6f590909/frai-06-1020592-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9e8/10034015/4044174b3574/frai-06-1020592-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9e8/10034015/8a4f6f590909/frai-06-1020592-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
The assessment list for trustworthy artificial intelligence: A review and recommendations.可信人工智能评估清单:综述与建议
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Mar 9;6:1020592. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1020592. eCollection 2023.
2
In AI We Trust: Ethics, Artificial Intelligence, and Reliability.深信人工智能:伦理、人工智能与可靠性。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Oct;26(5):2749-2767. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00228-y. Epub 2020 Jun 10.
3
Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence.可信医疗人工智能的伦理与治理。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jan 13;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02103-9.
4
Trustworthy artificial intelligence and ethical design: public perceptions of trustworthiness of an AI-based decision-support tool in the context of intrapartum care.值得信赖的人工智能和道德设计:公众对基于人工智能的决策支持工具在产时护理背景下的可信度的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2023 Jun 20;24(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00917-w.
5
Governing Data and Artificial Intelligence for Health Care: Developing an International Understanding.治理医疗保健领域的数据与人工智能:达成国际共识。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jan 31;6(1):e31623. doi: 10.2196/31623.
6
Enhancing trust in AI through industry self-governance.通过行业自律增强对人工智能的信任。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Jul 14;28(7):1582-1590. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab065.
7
Actionable Principles for Artificial Intelligence Policy: Three Pathways.人工智能政策的可行原则:三条路径。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2021 Feb 19;27(1):15. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00277-3.
8
Ethical Applications of Artificial Intelligence: Evidence From Health Research on Veterans.人工智能的伦理应用:来自退伍军人健康研究的证据。
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jun 2;9(6):e28921. doi: 10.2196/28921.
9
Current challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in medical imaging.当前在医学影像中实施人工智能所面临的挑战。
Phys Med. 2022 Aug;100:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
10
AI-deploying organizations are key to addressing 'perfect storm' of AI risks.部署人工智能的组织是应对人工智能风险“完美风暴”的关键。
AI Ethics. 2023;3(1):145-153. doi: 10.1007/s43681-022-00163-7. Epub 2022 May 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiology AI and sustainability paradox: environmental, economic, and social dimensions.放射学人工智能与可持续性悖论:环境、经济和社会维度
Insights Imaging. 2025 Apr 17;16(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-01962-2.
2
Augmented intelligence with voice assistance and automated machine learning in Industry 5.0.工业5.0中具有语音辅助和自动化机器学习的增强智能。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Mar 4;8:1538840. doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1538840. eCollection 2025.
3
Empowering cancer research in Europe: the EUCAIM cancer imaging infrastructure.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical funding for trustworthy AI: proposals to address the responsibilities of funders to ensure that projects adhere to trustworthy AI practice.值得信赖的人工智能的道德资助:关于解决资助者责任以确保项目遵循值得信赖的人工智能实践的建议。
AI Ethics. 2022;2(2):277-291. doi: 10.1007/s43681-021-00069-w. Epub 2021 Jun 13.
2
IEEE P7001: A Proposed Standard on Transparency.IEEE P7001:一项关于透明度的拟议标准。
Front Robot AI. 2021 Jul 26;8:665729. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.665729. eCollection 2021.
3
Transparent, explainable, and accountable AI for robotics.
助力欧洲癌症研究:欧盟癌症成像基础设施(EUCAIM)
Insights Imaging. 2025 Feb 24;16(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-01913-x.
4
Clinical Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Human Cancer: Is It Time to Update the Diagnostic and Predictive Models in Managing Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)?人工智能(AI)在人类癌症中的临床应用:是时候更新肝细胞癌(HCC)管理中的诊断和预测模型了吗?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 22;15(3):252. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15030252.
5
Establishing and evaluating trustworthy AI: overview and research challenges.建立和评估可信人工智能:概述与研究挑战
Front Big Data. 2024 Nov 29;7:1467222. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2024.1467222. eCollection 2024.
6
Analyzing the European institutional response to ethical and regulatory challenges of artificial intelligence in addressing discriminatory bias.分析欧洲机构在应对人工智能解决歧视性偏见方面的伦理和监管挑战时所做出的反应。
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Jun 25;7:1393259. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1393259. eCollection 2024.
7
Pitfalls in Developing Machine Learning Models for Predicting Cardiovascular Diseases: Challenge and Solutions.机器学习模型在预测心血管疾病中的陷阱:挑战与解决方案。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 26;26:e47645. doi: 10.2196/47645.
8
Service Quality and Residents' Preferences for Facilitated Self-Service Fundus Disease Screening: Cross-Sectional Study.服务质量与居民对自助式眼底疾病筛查的偏好:横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Apr 17;26:e45545. doi: 10.2196/45545.
9
Artificial intelligence in the risk prediction models of cardiovascular disease and development of an independent validation screening tool: a systematic review.人工智能在心血管疾病风险预测模型中的应用及独立验证筛选工具的开发:系统评价。
BMC Med. 2024 Feb 5;22(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03273-7.
10
Personalized Risk Analysis to Improve the Psychological Resilience of Women Undergoing Treatment for Breast Cancer: Development of a Machine Learning-Driven Clinical Decision Support Tool.个性化风险分析提高乳腺癌治疗女性的心理韧性:基于机器学习的临床决策支持工具的开发。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jun 12;25:e43838. doi: 10.2196/43838.
用于机器人技术的透明、可解释和可问责的人工智能。
Sci Robot. 2017 May 31;2(6). doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aan6080.
4
A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets.一种用于深度信念网络的快速学习算法。
Neural Comput. 2006 Jul;18(7):1527-54. doi: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527.