• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工智能的伦理应用:来自退伍军人健康研究的证据。

Ethical Applications of Artificial Intelligence: Evidence From Health Research on Veterans.

作者信息

Makridis Christos, Hurley Seth, Klote Mary, Alterovitz Gil

机构信息

National Artificial Intelligence Institute, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC, United States.

Stanford Digital Economy Lab, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jun 2;9(6):e28921. doi: 10.2196/28921.

DOI:10.2196/28921
PMID:34076584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8209529/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite widespread agreement that artificial intelligence (AI) offers significant benefits for individuals and society at large, there are also serious challenges to overcome with respect to its governance. Recent policymaking has focused on establishing principles for the trustworthy use of AI. Adhering to these principles is especially important for ensuring that the development and application of AI raises economic and social welfare, including among vulnerable groups and veterans.

OBJECTIVE

We explore the newly developed principles around trustworthy AI and how they can be readily applied at scale to vulnerable groups that are potentially less likely to benefit from technological advances.

METHODS

Using the US Department of Veterans Affairs as a case study, we explore the principles of trustworthy AI that are of particular interest for vulnerable groups and veterans.

RESULTS

We focus on three principles: (1) designing, developing, acquiring, and using AI so that the benefits of its use significantly outweigh the risks and the risks are assessed and managed; (2) ensuring that the application of AI occurs in well-defined domains and is accurate, effective, and fit for the intended purposes; and (3) ensuring that the operations and outcomes of AI applications are sufficiently interpretable and understandable by all subject matter experts, users, and others.

CONCLUSIONS

These principles and applications apply more generally to vulnerable groups, and adherence to them can allow the VA and other organizations to continue modernizing their technology governance, leveraging the gains of AI while simultaneously managing its risks.

摘要

背景

尽管人们普遍认为人工智能(AI)能为个人乃至整个社会带来巨大益处,但在其治理方面仍存在严峻挑战有待克服。近期的政策制定聚焦于确立人工智能可靠使用的原则。坚持这些原则对于确保人工智能的开发和应用能够提升经济和社会福祉,包括弱势群体和退伍军人的福祉而言尤为重要。

目的

我们探讨围绕可靠人工智能的新制定原则,以及如何能够大规模地将这些原则应用于那些可能较难从技术进步中受益的弱势群体。

方法

以美国退伍军人事务部为例,我们探讨对弱势群体和退伍军人特别重要的可靠人工智能原则。

结果

我们着重关注三项原则:(1)设计、开发、获取和使用人工智能,使其使用的益处显著超过风险,且风险得到评估和管理;(2)确保人工智能的应用在明确界定的领域内进行,并且准确、有效且适合预期目的;(3)确保人工智能应用的操作和结果能被所有主题专家、用户及其他人员充分解读和理解。

结论

这些原则和应用更广泛地适用于弱势群体,坚持这些原则能使退伍军人事务部及其他组织继续推进其技术治理现代化,在利用人工智能带来的收益的同时管理其风险。

相似文献

1
Ethical Applications of Artificial Intelligence: Evidence From Health Research on Veterans.人工智能的伦理应用:来自退伍军人健康研究的证据。
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Jun 2;9(6):e28921. doi: 10.2196/28921.
2
Implementing Trustworthy AI in VA High Reliability Health Care Organizations.在退伍军人事务部高可靠性医疗保健组织中实施可信人工智能。
Fed Pract. 2024 Feb;41(2):40-43. doi: 10.12788/fp.0454. Epub 2024 Feb 15.
3
Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence.可信医疗人工智能的伦理与治理。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Jan 13;23(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02103-9.
4
The assessment list for trustworthy artificial intelligence: A review and recommendations.可信人工智能评估清单:综述与建议
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Mar 9;6:1020592. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1020592. eCollection 2023.
5
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Medicine: Promises, Ethical Challenges and Governance.医疗保健与医学中的人工智能:前景、伦理挑战与治理
Chin Med Sci J. 2019 Jun 30;34(2):76-83. doi: 10.24920/003611.
6
A critical perspective on guidelines for responsible and trustworthy artificial intelligence.对负责任和值得信赖的人工智能指南的批判性观点。
Med Health Care Philos. 2020 Sep;23(3):387-399. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09948-1.
7
Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy.您的机器人治疗师现在为您服务:具身人工智能在精神病学、心理学和心理治疗中的伦理意义。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 9;21(5):e13216. doi: 10.2196/13216.
8
Defining AMIA's artificial intelligence principles.定义 AMIA 的人工智能原则。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Mar 15;29(4):585-591. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac006.
9
Patients' Perceptions Toward Human-Artificial Intelligence Interaction in Health Care: Experimental Study.患者对医疗保健中人机交互的看法:实验研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Nov 25;23(11):e25856. doi: 10.2196/25856.
10
Politics by Automatic Means? A Critique of Artificial Intelligence Ethics at Work.通过自动化手段实现的政治?对工作中的人工智能伦理的批判。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Jul 15;5:869114. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.869114. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding artificial intelligence through the eyes of future nurses: Insights from nursing students.从未来护士的视角理解人工智能:来自护理专业学生的见解。
Saudi Med J. 2025 Mar;46(3):238-243. doi: 10.15537/smj.2025.46.3.20241069.
2
Mapping the Bibliometrics Landscape of AI in Medicine: Methodological Study.人工智能在医学中的文献计量学图谱绘制:方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 8;25:e45815. doi: 10.2196/45815.
3
The Role of Artificial Intelligence Model Documentation in Translational Science: Scoping Review.人工智能模型文档在转化科学中的作用:范围综述
Interact J Med Res. 2023 Jul 14;12:e45903. doi: 10.2196/45903.
4
Designing COVID-19 mortality predictions to advance clinical outcomes: Evidence from the Department of Veterans Affairs.设计 COVID-19 死亡率预测模型以改善临床结局:来自退伍军人事务部的证据。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Jun;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2020-100312.

本文引用的文献

1
Leveraging machine learning to characterize the role of socio-economic determinants on physical health and well-being among veterans.利用机器学习来描述社会经济决定因素对退伍军人身体健康和幸福感的作用。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Jun;133:104354. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104354. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
2
An empirical characterization of fair machine learning for clinical risk prediction.用于临床风险预测的公平机器学习的实证特征描述。
J Biomed Inform. 2021 Jan;113:103621. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103621. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
3
Prediction of Loneliness in Older Adults Using Natural Language Processing: Exploring Sex Differences in Speech.利用自然语言处理预测老年人的孤独感:探索言语中的性别差异。
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;29(8):853-866. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.09.009. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Geographic Distribution of US Cohorts Used to Train Deep Learning Algorithms.美国用于训练深度学习算法的队列的地理分布。
JAMA. 2020 Sep 22;324(12):1212-1213. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12067.
5
The myth of generalisability in clinical research and machine learning in health care.临床研究和医疗保健中机器学习的泛化性神话。
Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Sep;2(9):e489-e492. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30186-2. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
6
Personal aging markers and ageotypes revealed by deep longitudinal profiling.通过深度纵向分析揭示的个体衰老标志物和年龄类型。
Nat Med. 2020 Jan;26(1):83-90. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0719-5. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
7
Comparing Artificial Intelligence Platforms for Histopathologic Cancer Diagnosis.比较用于组织病理学癌症诊断的人工智能平台
Fed Pract. 2019 Oct;36(10):456-463.
8
Addressing Bias in Artificial Intelligence in Health Care.应对医疗保健领域人工智能中的偏见问题。
JAMA. 2019 Dec 24;322(24):2377-2378. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.18058.
9
A clinically applicable approach to continuous prediction of future acute kidney injury.一种临床适用的急性肾损伤未来发生的连续预测方法。
Nature. 2019 Aug;572(7767):116-119. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1390-1. Epub 2019 Jul 31.
10
The utility of artificial intelligence in suicide risk prediction and the management of suicidal behaviors.人工智能在自杀风险预测和自杀行为管理中的应用。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019 Oct;53(10):954-964. doi: 10.1177/0004867419864428. Epub 2019 Jul 26.