• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字技能方面的非认知技能与社会差距:来自2018年国际计算机与信息素养研究(ICILS)的证据

Non-cognitive skills and social gaps in digital skills: Evidence from ICILS 2018.

作者信息

Karpiński Zbigniew, Di Pietro Giorgio, Biagi Federico

机构信息

European Commission Joint Research Centre, Edificio EXPO, calle Inca Garcilaso 3, 41092 Seville, Spain.

Institute of Philosophy and Sociology Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Nowy Swiat 72, 00-330 Warsaw, Poland.

出版信息

Learn Individ Differ. 2023 Feb;102:None. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102254.

DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102254
PMID:36968130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10028727/
Abstract

Using data from the 2018 round of the International Computer and Literacy Survey (ICILS), this study looks at the effect of non-cognitive skills (e.g., motivation, ambition, and conscientiousness) on digital competences as measured by the Computer and Information Literacy (CIL) test score. Non-cognitive skills may be especially important in low-stakes tests such as ICILS, where students face no consequences - positive or negative - as a result of their performance. The empirical results show that several non-self-reported measures acting as proxies for non-cognitive skills are significant determinants of CIL test scores. Furthermore, the findings point at differences in non-cognitive skills across gender, immigrant background, and socioeconomic status. This suggests that one should be cautious when inferring about inequality in digital competences along these dimensions using low-stakes test scores, and underscores the importance of controlling for non-cognitive skills.

摘要

本研究利用2018年国际计算机与素养调查(ICILS)的数据,考察了非认知技能(如动机、抱负和尽责性)对以计算机与信息素养(CIL)测试分数衡量的数字能力的影响。在诸如ICILS这类低风险测试中,非认知技能可能尤为重要,因为在这类测试中,学生的表现不会带来任何正面或负面的后果。实证结果表明,作为非认知技能代理指标的几项非自我报告测量指标是CIL测试分数的重要决定因素。此外,研究结果还指出了不同性别、移民背景和社会经济地位在非认知技能方面的差异。这表明,在使用低风险测试分数推断这些维度上的数字能力不平等时应谨慎行事,并强调了控制非认知技能的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01ed/10028727/ab23598f19bf/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01ed/10028727/ab23598f19bf/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/01ed/10028727/ab23598f19bf/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Non-cognitive skills and social gaps in digital skills: Evidence from ICILS 2018.数字技能方面的非认知技能与社会差距:来自2018年国际计算机与信息素养研究(ICILS)的证据
Learn Individ Differ. 2023 Feb;102:None. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102254.
2
Digital inequality in Austria: Empirical evidence from the survey of the OECD "Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies".奥地利的数字不平等:经合组织“成人能力国际评估计划”调查的实证证据
Technol Soc. 2020 Nov;63:101397. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101397. Epub 2020 Sep 9.
3
Building Digital Literacy in Older Adults of Low Socioeconomic Status in Singapore (Project Wire Up): Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.在新加坡社会经济地位较低的老年人中培养数字素养(项目 Wire Up):非随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 2;24(12):e40341. doi: 10.2196/40341.
4
It's about time! Exploring time allocation patterns of adults with lower literacy skills on a digital assessment.正是时候!探索低识字技能成年人在数字评估中的时间分配模式。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 7;15:1338014. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1338014. eCollection 2024.
5
Evaluating computing students' digital skills and health literacy: A case from Bulgaria.评估计算专业学生的数字技能和健康素养:来自保加利亚的案例。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 24;10:1085842. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1085842. eCollection 2022.
6
Digital literacy skills of university students with visual impairment: A mixed-methods analysis.视力障碍大学生的数字素养技能:一项混合方法分析。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(4):5605-5625. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10860-1. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
7
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
8
Student performance on the Test of Scientific Literacy Skills (TOSLS) does not change with assignment of a low-stakes grade.学生在科学素养技能测试(TOSLS)中的表现不会因给予低风险成绩而改变。
BMC Res Notes. 2018 Jul 3;11(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3545-9.
9
Digital Inequality During a Pandemic: Quantitative Study of Differences in COVID-19-Related Internet Uses and Outcomes Among the General Population.大流行期间的数字不平等:普通人群中与COVID-19相关的互联网使用情况及结果差异的定量研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 20;22(8):e20073. doi: 10.2196/20073.
10
The Role of Age, Education, and Digital Health Literacy in the Usability of Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain: Mixed Methods Study.年龄、教育程度和数字健康素养在基于互联网的慢性疼痛认知行为疗法可用性中的作用:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2019 Nov 21;3(4):e12883. doi: 10.2196/12883.

本文引用的文献

1
The mechanisms of interest and perseverance in predicting achievement among academically resilient and non-resilient students: Evidence from Swedish longitudinal data.学业韧性强和非韧性学生的成就预测中的兴趣和毅力的机制:来自瑞典纵向数据的证据。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2021 Dec;91(4):1481-1497. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12431. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
2
Validation of survey effort measures of grit and self-control in a sample of high school students.在高中生样本中对坚毅和自我控制的调查努力措施进行验证。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 1;15(7):e0235396. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235396. eCollection 2020.
3
Females show more sustained performance during test-taking than males.
女性在考试期间的表现比男性更持久。
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 3;10(1):3798. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11691-y.
4
Can non-cognitive skills compensate for background disadvantage? -- the moderation of non-cognitive skills on family socioeconomic status and achievement during early childhood and early adolescence.非认知技能能否弥补背景劣势?——非认知技能对儿童早期和青少年早期家庭社会经济地位和成就的调节作用。
Soc Sci Res. 2019 Sep;83:102306. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.04.019. Epub 2019 May 2.
5
Grit and self-discipline as predictors of effort and academic attainment.坚毅和自律是努力和学业成就的预测指标。
Br J Educ Psychol. 2019 Jun;89(2):324-342. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12241. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
6
Social and behavioral skills and the gender gap in early educational achievement.社会行为技能与早期教育成就的性别差距。
Soc Sci Res. 2012 Jan;41(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
7
A Practical Guide to Calculating Cohen's f(2), a Measure of Local Effect Size, from PROC MIXED.从PROC MIXED计算局部效应量指标科恩f(2)的实用指南。
Front Psychol. 2012 Apr 17;3:111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00111. eCollection 2012.
8
Establishing Causality Using Longitudinal Hierarchical Linear Modeling: An Illustration Predicting Achievement From Self-Control.使用纵向分层线性模型建立因果关系:以自我控制对学业成绩的预测为例
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2010 Oct 1;1(4):311-317. doi: 10.1177/1948550609359707.
9
Why can't a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures.为什么男人不能更像女人?55种文化中五大性格特质的性别差异。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Jan;94(1):168-182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168.
10
Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: a new look at an old issue.横断面多层次模型中的预测变量中心化:对一个老问题的新审视。
Psychol Methods. 2007 Jun;12(2):121-38. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.2.121.