Mišík Matúš, Nosko Andrej
Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia.
Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, Slovakia.
Energy Policy. 2023 Jun;177:113546. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113546. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
The key policy priority for governments around the world during the 2020-2021 period was the response to the Covid-19 pandemic. However, this was swiftly replaced by an even graver urgent need to respond to Russia's full-scale attack on Ukraine in February 2022. This special issue aims to study the post-pandemic response and how related policy choices influence decarbonisation and energy transition efforts in the EU. While the special issue was initially conceived before Russia's invasion of Ukraine, the question of policy responses to critical situations remains even more relevant in the face of Russia's attempt to redraft the political landscape of Europe by force. The dichotomy of existing views on whether the crisis caused by the pandemic is an opportunity or a threat to the energy transition is also present in the discussion and perception of the EU's energy and climate policy after the Russian invasion at least temporarily shifted energy security and decarbonisation priorities. Analysing energy and climate dimensions of the EU's post-pandemic recovery can provide policy implications applicable to the energy security crisis connected to the Russian invasion of Ukraine.
2020 - 2021年期间,世界各国政府的关键政策重点是应对新冠疫情。然而,这一重点迅速被2022年2月对俄罗斯全面进攻乌克兰这一更为严峻的紧急情况所取代。本期特刊旨在研究疫情后的应对措施,以及相关政策选择如何影响欧盟的脱碳和能源转型努力。虽然本期特刊最初是在俄罗斯入侵乌克兰之前构思的,但面对俄罗斯试图以武力重塑欧洲政治格局的情况,应对关键局势的政策问题变得更加重要。关于疫情引发的危机对能源转型是机遇还是威胁的现有观点分歧,在俄罗斯入侵后欧盟能源和气候政策的讨论和认知中也存在,至少暂时改变了能源安全和脱碳的优先次序。分析欧盟疫情后复苏的能源和气候层面,可以为适用于与俄罗斯入侵乌克兰相关的能源安全危机提供政策启示。