• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在符合治疗用品管理局要求的粪便微生物群移植供体筛查项目中进行粪便供体筛查。

Stool donor screening within a Therapeutic Goods Administration compliant donor screening program for fecal microbiota transplantation.

作者信息

Tucker Emily C, Haylock-Jacobs Sarah, Rapaic Mirjana, Dann Lisa M, Bryant Robert V, Costello Samuel P

机构信息

BiomeBank Thebarton South Australia Australia.

Department of Infectious Diseases Flinders Medical Centre Bedford Park South Australia Australia.

出版信息

JGH Open. 2023 Feb 21;7(3):172-177. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12874. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.1002/jgh3.12874
PMID:36968571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10037028/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This study evaluates whether a stool donor program to supply fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) product is feasible in the Australian regulatory environment. The primary outcome was capacity to supply FMT product. The secondary outcomes were donor eligibility, retention, and output.

METHODS

Prospective observational cohort study using data collected from the stool donor and FMT production records from BiomeBank, South Australia. Participants were people who engaged with BiomeBank's donor screening and FMT manufacturing process between 01 January 2021 and 31 December 2021.

RESULTS

In total 176 people registered interest in the program, 74 of 176 (42.0%) proceeded to written questionnaire, 14 of 176 (8.0%) underwent clinical assessment, and 8 of 176 (4.5%) enrolled in the program. Two people were ineligible based on laboratory tests: both had an extended spectrum beta-lactamase producing organism in stool and one also tested positive for hepatitis B core antibody. Two donors remained eligible from 2020, resulting in 10 enrolled donors in 2021; 5 of 10 (50%) male with a median age of 36.9 years (interquartile range, 30.3-42.7 years). All donors were ineligible to donate at some time point. There were 144 stool donations processed into 1480 50 mL FMT; 413 FMT were shipped to 33 Australian hospitals for treatment, 470 for clinical trials, and 89 were destroyed prior to release from quarantine.

CONCLUSION

Recruitment into the program, retention, and maximizing the yield from a donation period was challenging. Despite this, BiomeBank was able to produce and supply FMT to Australian hospitals under the TGA-regulated Class 2 Biologicals framework.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究评估在澳大利亚监管环境下,粪便供体计划供应粪便微生物群移植(FMT)产品是否可行。主要结果是供应FMT产品的能力。次要结果是供体资格、留存率和产量。

方法

采用前瞻性观察队列研究,收集来自南澳大利亚生物银行的粪便供体数据和FMT生产记录。参与者为2021年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间参与生物银行供体筛查和FMT制造过程的人员。

结果

共有176人对该计划表示感兴趣,176人中74人(42.0%)进入书面问卷调查,176人中14人(8.0%)接受临床评估,176人中8人(4.5%)加入该计划。根据实验室检测,有两人不符合资格:两人粪便中均有产超广谱β-内酰胺酶的生物体,其中一人乙肝核心抗体检测也呈阳性。2020年有两名供体仍符合资格,因此2021年有10名登记供体;10名中有5名(50%)为男性,中位年龄为36.9岁(四分位间距,30.3 - 42.7岁)。所有供体在某些时间点均不符合捐赠条件。共处理了144次粪便捐赠,制成1480份50毫升的FMT;413份FMT被运往33家澳大利亚医院用于治疗,470份用于临床试验,89份在解除隔离前被销毁。

结论

该计划的招募、留存以及在捐赠期内实现产量最大化具有挑战性。尽管如此,生物银行能够在澳大利亚治疗用品管理局(TGA)监管的2类生物制品框架下生产并向澳大利亚医院供应FMT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145e/10037028/4ff7a7707491/JGH3-7-172-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145e/10037028/a322d719dc6c/JGH3-7-172-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145e/10037028/4ff7a7707491/JGH3-7-172-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145e/10037028/a322d719dc6c/JGH3-7-172-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145e/10037028/4ff7a7707491/JGH3-7-172-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Stool donor screening within a Therapeutic Goods Administration compliant donor screening program for fecal microbiota transplantation.在符合治疗用品管理局要求的粪便微生物群移植供体筛查项目中进行粪便供体筛查。
JGH Open. 2023 Feb 21;7(3):172-177. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12874. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
High prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase organisms and the COVID-19 pandemic impact on donor recruitment for fecal microbiota transplantation in Hong Kong.香港产 ESBL 菌的高流行率和 COVID-19 大流行对粪便微生物移植供体招募的影响。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Nov;9(9):1027-1038. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12160. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
3
In search of stool donors: a multicenter study of prior knowledge, perceptions, motivators, and deterrents among potential donors for fecal microbiota transplantation.寻找粪便捐赠者:一项多中心研究,调查潜在捐赠者对粪便微生物群移植的预先知识、看法、动机和阻碍因素。
Gut Microbes. 2020;11(1):51-62. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2019.1611153. Epub 2019 May 23.
4
Eligible blood donors' decisions about donating stool for fecal microbiota transplantation: Does ambivalence play a role?适合的献血者对捐赠粪便用于粪便微生物群移植的决策:矛盾心理是否起作用?
Transfusion. 2021 Feb;61(2):474-483. doi: 10.1111/trf.16109. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
5
A comprehensive approach to stool donor screening for faecal microbiota transplantation in China.中国粪便微生物群移植中粪便供体筛查的综合方法。
Microb Cell Fact. 2021 Nov 27;20(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12934-021-01705-0.
6
Challenges and costs of donor screening for fecal microbiota transplantations.粪便微生物移植供体筛查的挑战和成本。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 20;17(10):e0276323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276323. eCollection 2022.
7
Challenges establishing a multi-purpose fecal microbiota transplantation stool donor program in Toronto, Canada.在加拿大多伦多建立一个多用途粪便微生物群移植粪便供体项目所面临的挑战。
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2019 Nov 29;4(4):218-226. doi: 10.3138/jammi.2019-0003. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation Reduces Symptoms in Some Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Predominant Abdominal Bloating: Short- and Long-term Results From a Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial.粪便微生物群移植可减轻部分以腹胀为主的肠易激综合征患者的症状:一项安慰剂对照随机试验的短期和长期结果
Gastroenterology. 2021 Jan;160(1):145-157.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.07.013. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
9
Establishing a donor stool bank for faecal microbiota transplantation: methods and feasibility.建立粪便微生物群移植供体粪便库:方法和可行性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019 Oct;38(10):1837-1847. doi: 10.1007/s10096-019-03615-x. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
10
Donor program for fecal microbiota transplantation: A 3-year experience of a large-volume Italian stool bank.粪便微生物群移植供体计划:大容量意大利粪便库的 3 年经验。
Dig Liver Dis. 2021 Nov;53(11):1428-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 May 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Faecal microbiota transplant in Parkinson's disease: pilot study to establish safety & tolerability.帕金森病的粪便微生物群移植:建立安全性和耐受性的试点研究。
NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2025 Jul 9;11(1):203. doi: 10.1038/s41531-025-01061-5.
2
Donor-centric administration of the stool donor program is vital to its feasibility and patient safety.以供体为中心管理粪便供体计划对其可行性和患者安全至关重要。
Gut Microbes. 2025 Dec;17(1):2508950. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2025.2508950. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
3
A study protocol for a double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial on the use of encapsulated FMT for reducing the side effects of HSCT: the HSCT-BIOME study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of the global prevalence and trend of human intestinal carriage of ESBL-producing between healthcare and community settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医疗保健机构与社区环境中产生超广谱β-内酰胺酶的人类肠道携带的全球患病率及趋势比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Jun 2;4(3):dlac048. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac048. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
The Regulatory Approach for Faecal Microbiota Transplantation as Treatment for Infection in Italy.意大利将粪便微生物群移植作为感染治疗方法的监管方法。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Apr 5;11(4):480. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11040480.
3
Effectiveness and Safety of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Clostridioides Difficile Infection: Results From a 5344-Patient Cohort Study.
一项关于使用封装粪菌移植减少异基因造血干细胞移植副作用的双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验的研究方案:HSCT-BIOME研究。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 10;25(1):656. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14057-4.
4
Outcomes of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation for Infection in South Australia.南澳大利亚粪便微生物群移植治疗感染的结果。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 13;12(4):ofaf149. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf149. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Freeze-dried fecal microorganisms as an effective biomaterial for the treatment of calves suffering from diarrhea.冻干活菌作为一种有效的生物材料,用于治疗患有腹泻的犊牛。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 14;14(1):28078. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79267-5.
6
Assuring safety of fecal microbiota transplantation in the COVID-19 era: A single-center experience.确保新冠肺炎疫情时代粪便微生物群移植的安全性:单中心经验
JGH Open. 2023 Oct 20;7(11):765-771. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12979. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
"Seek and find" or "search and destroy?" Identifying and retaining "healthy" stool donors for fecal microbiota transplantation.“寻找并发现”还是“搜索并消灭”?识别并留住用于粪便微生物群移植的“健康”粪便捐献者。
JGH Open. 2023 Mar 23;7(3):169-171. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12892. eCollection 2023 Mar.
艰难梭菌感染粪便微生物群移植的有效性和安全性:来自一项5344例患者队列研究的结果
Gastroenterology. 2022 Jul;163(1):319-322. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.051. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
4
High prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase organisms and the COVID-19 pandemic impact on donor recruitment for fecal microbiota transplantation in Hong Kong.香港产 ESBL 菌的高流行率和 COVID-19 大流行对粪便微生物移植供体招募的影响。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Nov;9(9):1027-1038. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12160. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
5
Stool Banking for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation: Methods and Operations at a Large Stool Bank.粪便银行用于粪便微生物群移植:大型粪便银行的方法和操作。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Apr 15;11:622949. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.622949. eCollection 2021.
6
Laboratory Aspects of Donor Screening for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation at a Korean Fecal Microbiota Bank.韩国粪便微生物群银行供体筛查的实验室方面。
Ann Lab Med. 2021 Jul 1;41(4):424-428. doi: 10.3343/alm.2021.41.4.424.
7
Faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent infection: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.粪便微生物群移植治疗复发性感染:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov 23;29-30:100642. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100642. eCollection 2020 Dec.
8
Periodic screening of donor faeces with a quarantine period to prevent transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms during faecal microbiota transplantation: a retrospective cohort study.定期筛查供体粪便并进行隔离,以防止在粪便微生物群移植过程中传播多药耐药菌:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 May;21(5):711-721. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30473-4. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
9
Systematic review: the global incidence of faecal microbiota transplantation-related adverse events from 2000 to 2020.系统评价:2000 年至 2020 年粪便微生物群移植相关不良事件的全球发生率。
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Jan;53(1):33-42. doi: 10.1111/apt.16148. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
10
A standardised model for stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation: a consensus report from a multidisciplinary UEG working group.粪便银行用于粪便微生物群移植的标准化模型:多学科 UEG 工作组的共识报告。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2021 Mar;9(2):229-247. doi: 10.1177/2050640620967898. Epub 2021 Mar 9.