Shamdasani Pallavi, Liew David F L, Nohrenberg Michael, Leroi Marcel M, McMaster Christopher, Owen Claire E, Hardidge Andrew, Buchanan Russell R C
Department of Rheumatology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2023 Mar 24;7(Suppl 1):i12-i18. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkad008. eCollection 2023 Apr.
Diagnosing septic arthritis can be challenging and frequently involves clinical assessment, laboratory investigations and synovial fluid analysis. We sought to determine the utility of synovial aspiration and intra-operative synovial fluid and tissue culture for the accurate diagnosis of septic arthritis.
We carried out a retrospective review of the records of patients referred to a tertiary orthopaedic unit with possible septic arthritis between 2015 and 2019 inclusive, including clinical and laboratory data for this cohort study. Performance characteristics were determined for synovial aspiration, intra-operative synovial fluid and tissue culture in diagnosing expert review-determined true septic arthritis. Concordance between discharge diagnosis, antibiotic prescribing and true septic arthritis was determined.
Of 268 patients identified with suspected septic arthritis, 143 underwent both synovial fluid aspiration and intra-operative synovial fluid and tissue biopsy culture. True septic arthritis was not differentiated significantly by laboratory parameters including serum white cell count (WCC), CRP or synovial WCC. Considering only patients with negative pre-operative synovial aspirate cultures, intra-operative samples led to diagnosis of true septic arthritis in 6 of 63 patients [number needed to treat (NNT) 10.5]. For all patients sampled in theatre, positive synovial tissue biopsy was the only evidence of true septic arthritis in six (NNT 23.9). Despite insufficient microbiological evidence, 27 of the 59 patients who did not have septic arthritis received a discharge diagnosis of septic arthritis, 26 of whom were discharged with antibiotics.
Intra-operative sample collection, particularly tissue biopsy, increases the likelihood of a true septic arthritis diagnosis. Such measures might help to reduce diagnostic ambiguity in clinical practice and might therefore reduce overtreatment.
诊断化脓性关节炎具有挑战性,通常需要进行临床评估、实验室检查和滑液分析。我们试图确定滑液抽吸以及术中滑液和组织培养对准确诊断化脓性关节炎的作用。
我们对2015年至2019年(含)期间转诊至三级骨科单位、疑似化脓性关节炎患者的记录进行了回顾性研究,包括该队列研究的临床和实验室数据。确定了滑液抽吸、术中滑液和组织培养在诊断专家评审确定的真正化脓性关节炎方面的性能特征。确定了出院诊断、抗生素处方与真正化脓性关节炎之间的一致性。
在268例疑似化脓性关节炎患者中,143例接受了滑液抽吸以及术中滑液和组织活检培养。包括血清白细胞计数(WCC)、CRP或滑液WCC在内的实验室参数未显著区分真正的化脓性关节炎。仅考虑术前滑液抽吸培养结果为阴性的患者,术中样本使63例患者中的6例确诊为真正的化脓性关节炎[需治疗人数(NNT)为10.5]。对于所有在手术室取样的患者,滑膜组织活检阳性是6例真正化脓性关节炎的唯一证据(NNT为23.9)。尽管微生物学证据不足,但59例非化脓性关节炎患者中有27例出院诊断为化脓性关节炎,其中26例出院时使用了抗生素。
术中样本采集,尤其是组织活检,增加了确诊真正化脓性关节炎的可能性。这些措施可能有助于减少临床实践中的诊断模糊性,从而减少过度治疗。