• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动化水平如何影响人类在不同场景下与工业机器人协作时的道德决策。

How automation level influences moral decisions of humans collaborating with industrial robots in different scenarios.

作者信息

Eich Anne, Klichowicz Anja, Bocklisch Franziska

机构信息

Research Group "Human-Cyber-Physical Systems", Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, Materials and Surface Engineering Group, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1107306. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1107306. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1107306
PMID:36968758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10035336/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Digitalization in intelligent manufacturing leads to the development of Industry 4.0/5.0 and human-cyber-physical systems. As many production technologies rely on teaming of human workers and intelligent cyber-physical systems such as industrial robots, human-robot collaboration is an intensively investigated topic in this transdisciplinary research area. To design industrial robots in a human-centered way, psychological knowledge concerning judgment and decision-making needs to be gained and integrated.

METHOD

This paper reports results from an experimental study ( 222, 2 × 4 within-subjects design) using eight moral dilemmas framed in the context of human-robot-collaboration to examine the influence of spatial distance of an industrial robot and humans (no direct contact, different tasks vs. no direct contact, same task vs. handing-over contact, same task vs. direct contact, same task) on moral decisions. Additionally, the type of dilemma was varied, with every four dilemmas depicting a life-or-death and an injury scenario. Participants responded on a four-point-response scale which actions they would take indicating deontological or utilitarian moral decision-making.

RESULTS

Results show a large effect of the proximity of the cooperation between robots and humans. The closer the collaboration the more a human tends to choose utilitarian moral choices.

DISCUSSION

It is argued that this effect might stem from an adaptation of human rationality to the robot or overreliance and shift of responsibility to the robot team partner.

摘要

引言

智能制造中的数字化推动了工业4.0/5.0以及人机物理系统的发展。由于许多生产技术依赖于人类工人与诸如工业机器人等智能人机物理系统的协作,人机协作是这个跨学科研究领域中一个深入研究的课题。要以以人为本的方式设计工业机器人,就需要获取并整合有关判断和决策的心理学知识。

方法

本文报告了一项实验研究(222名参与者,2×4被试内设计)的结果,该研究使用了八个在人机协作背景下构建的道德困境,以检验工业机器人与人类的空间距离(无直接接触、不同任务与无直接接触、相同任务与交接接触、相同任务与直接接触、相同任务)对道德决策的影响。此外,困境的类型也有所不同,每四个困境描述一个生死场景和一个伤害场景。参与者以四点反应量表回答他们会采取的行动,表明义务论或功利主义的道德决策。

结果

结果显示机器人与人类合作的接近程度有很大影响。合作越紧密,人类越倾向于选择功利主义的道德选择。

讨论

有人认为,这种影响可能源于人类理性对机器人的适应,或者是对机器人团队伙伴的过度依赖和责任转移。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f08/10035336/f8088f1b191a/fpsyg-14-1107306-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f08/10035336/4506d2d67d75/fpsyg-14-1107306-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f08/10035336/f8088f1b191a/fpsyg-14-1107306-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f08/10035336/4506d2d67d75/fpsyg-14-1107306-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f08/10035336/f8088f1b191a/fpsyg-14-1107306-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
How automation level influences moral decisions of humans collaborating with industrial robots in different scenarios.自动化水平如何影响人类在不同场景下与工业机器人协作时的道德决策。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 9;14:1107306. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1107306. eCollection 2023.
2
Moral Uncanny Valley revisited - how human expectations of robot morality based on robot appearance moderate the perceived morality of robot decisions in high conflict moral dilemmas.重新审视道德诡异谷——基于机器人外观的人类对机器人道德的期望如何在高度冲突的道德困境中调节对机器人决策道德性的认知。
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 21;14:1270371. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1270371. eCollection 2023.
3
Humans and cyber-physical systems as teammates? Characteristics and applicability of the human-machine-teaming concept in intelligent manufacturing.人类与网络物理系统作为协作伙伴?人机协作概念在智能制造中的特点与适用性。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Nov 3;6:1247755. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1247755. eCollection 2023.
4
Collaborating eye to eye: Effects of workplace design on the perception of dominance of collaboration robots.眼神交流式协作:工作场所设计对协作机器人主导感认知的影响
Front Robot AI. 2022 Sep 27;9:999308. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.999308. eCollection 2022.
5
Moral Judgment and Empathic/Deontological Guilt.道德判断与共情/道义内疚
Psychol Rep. 2019 Aug;122(4):1395-1411. doi: 10.1177/0033294118787500. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
6
Whether to Save a Robot or a Human: On the Ethical and Legal Limits of Protections for Robots.救机器人还是救人类:论机器人保护的伦理与法律限度
Front Robot AI. 2021 Jul 7;8:712427. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.712427. eCollection 2021.
7
A Mixed-Perception Approach for Safe Human-Robot Collaboration in Industrial Automation.一种用于工业自动化中安全人机协作的混合感知方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 7;20(21):6347. doi: 10.3390/s20216347.
8
Risk of Injury in Moral Dilemmas With Autonomous Vehicles.自动驾驶汽车面临的道德困境中的受伤风险。
Front Robot AI. 2021 Jan 20;7:572529. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2020.572529. eCollection 2020.
9
Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment.被手推车带偏:为什么牺牲性道德困境对功利主义判断的揭示甚少(或毫无揭示)。
Soc Neurosci. 2015;10(5):551-60. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1023400. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
10
Polysubstance dependent patients display a more utilitarian profile in moral decision-making than alcohol-dependent patients, depressive patients and controls.与酒精依赖患者、抑郁患者和对照组相比,物质使用障碍患者在道德决策中表现出更实用的特征。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013 Oct 1;132(3):434-40. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Humans and cyber-physical systems as teammates? Characteristics and applicability of the human-machine-teaming concept in intelligent manufacturing.人类与网络物理系统作为协作伙伴?人机协作概念在智能制造中的特点与适用性。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Nov 3;6:1247755. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1247755. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Thinking More or Feeling Less? Explaining the Foreign-Language Effect on Moral Judgment.思考得多还是感受得少?解释外语对道德判断的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Oct;28(10):1387-1397. doi: 10.1177/0956797617720944. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
2
Reading dilemmas in a foreign language reduces both deontological and utilitarian response tendencies.用外语阅读困境会降低义务论和功利主义的反应倾向。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Feb;44(2):321-326. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000447. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
3
What makes moral dilemma judgments "utilitarian" or "deontological"?
是什么使得道德困境判断成为“功利主义的”或“义务论的”?
Soc Neurosci. 2017 Dec;12(6):626-632. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1248787. Epub 2016 Oct 28.
4
Once a Utilitarian, Consistently a Utilitarian? Examining Principledness in Moral Judgment via the Robustness of Individual Differences.一旦成为功利主义者,是否始终如一?通过个体差异的稳健性检验道德判断中的原则性。
J Pers. 2017 Aug;85(4):505-517. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12256. Epub 2016 May 14.
5
Situational variation in moral judgment: In a stage or on a stage?情境变化与道德判断:在舞台上还是在阶段中?
J Youth Adolesc. 1992 Apr;21(2):203-24. doi: 10.1007/BF01537337.
6
Reflection and reasoning in moral judgment.道德判断中的反思与推理。
Cogn Sci. 2012 Jan-Feb;36(1):163-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01210.x. Epub 2011 Nov 3.
7
An analysis of clinical reasoning through a recent and comprehensive approach: the dual-process theory.通过一种最新且全面的方法分析临床推理:双加工理论。
Med Educ Online. 2011 Mar 14;16. doi: 10.3402/meo.v16i0.5890.
8
A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality.关于判断与选择的一种视角:描绘有限理性
Am Psychol. 2003 Sep;58(9):697-720. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697.
9
Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem.杀人、听任死亡与电车难题。
Monist. 1976 Apr;59(2):204-17. doi: 10.5840/monist197659224.
10
An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment.一项关于道德判断中情感参与的功能磁共振成像研究。
Science. 2001 Sep 14;293(5537):2105-8. doi: 10.1126/science.1062872.