• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高剂量头孢吡肟与碳青霉烯类药物治疗产临床上显著AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的中高风险肠杆菌科细菌所致菌血症的疗效比较

High-dose Cefepime vs Carbapenems for Bacteremia Caused by Enterobacterales With Moderate to High Risk of Clinically Significant AmpC β-lactamase Production.

作者信息

Kunz Coyne Ashlan J, El Ghali Amer, Lucas Kristen, Witucki Paige, Rebold Nicholas, Holger Dana J, Veve Michael P, Rybak Michael J

机构信息

Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

Anti-Infective Research Laboratory, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 25;10(3):ofad034. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad034. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.1093/ofid/ofad034
PMID:36968970
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10034593/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Limited data suggest that serious infections caused by Enterobacterales with a moderate to high risk of clinically significant AmpC production can be successfully treated with cefepime if the cefepime minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) is ≤2 µg/mL. However, isolates with a cefepime-susceptible dose-dependent (SDD) MIC of 4-8 µg/mL should receive a carbapenem due to target attainment and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) concerns.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with , or bacteremia from January 2015 to March 2022 receiving high-dose cefepime or a carbapenem. Cox regression models were used with incorporation of inverse probability of treatment weighting and time-varying covariates.

RESULTS

Of the 315 patients included, 169 received cefepime and 146 received a carbapenem (ertapenem n = 90, meropenem n = 56). Cefepime was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality compared with carbapenem therapy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.45; 95% CI, 0.79-2.14), which was consistent for patients with cefepime SDD isolates (aHR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.52-1.77). Multivariable weighted Cox models identified Pitt bacteremia score >4 (aHR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.04-1.92), deep infection (aHR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.21-4.32), and ceftriaxone-resistant AmpC-E (aHR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.03-1.59) to be independent predictors associated with increased mortality risk, while receipt of prolonged-infusion β-lactam was protective (aHR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.40-0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with bacteremia caused by Enterobacterales with moderate to high risk of clinically significant AmpC production, these data demonstrate similar risk of 30-day mortality for high-dose cefepime or a carbapenem as definitive β-lactam therapy.

摘要

背景

有限的数据表明,对于临床上产生具有中度至高风险的AmpC的肠杆菌科细菌引起的严重感染,如果头孢吡肟的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)≤2μg/mL,使用头孢吡肟可成功治疗。然而,由于目标达成情况以及对超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的担忧,头孢吡肟敏感剂量依赖性(SDD)MIC为4-8μg/mL的分离株应接受碳青霉烯类药物治疗。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2015年1月至2022年3月期间因 、 或 菌血症住院并接受高剂量头孢吡肟或碳青霉烯类药物治疗的患者。使用Cox回归模型,并纳入治疗权重的逆概率和随时间变化的协变量。

结果

在纳入的315例患者中,169例接受了头孢吡肟治疗,146例接受了碳青霉烯类药物治疗(厄他培南n = 90,美罗培南n = 56)。与碳青霉烯类药物治疗相比,头孢吡肟与30天死亡率增加风险无关(调整后的风险比[aHR],1.45;95%置信区间[CI],0.79-2.14),对于头孢吡肟SDD分离株的患者也是如此(aHR,1.19;95%CI,0.52-1.77)。多变量加权Cox模型确定 Pitt菌血症评分>4(aHR,1.41;95%CI,1.04-1.92)、深部感染(aHR,2.27;95%CI,1.21-4.32)和对头孢曲松耐药的AmpC-E(aHR,1.32;95%CI,1.03-1.59)是与死亡风险增加相关的独立预测因素,而接受延长输注的β-内酰胺类药物具有保护作用(aHR,0.67;95%CI,0.40-0.89)。

结论

在临床上产生具有中度至高风险的AmpC的肠杆菌科细菌引起菌血症的患者中,这些数据表明,高剂量头孢吡肟或碳青霉烯类药物作为确定性β-内酰胺类药物治疗的30天死亡率风险相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0181/10034593/a8d30a2140aa/ofad034f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0181/10034593/a8d30a2140aa/ofad034f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0181/10034593/a8d30a2140aa/ofad034f1.jpg

相似文献

1
High-dose Cefepime vs Carbapenems for Bacteremia Caused by Enterobacterales With Moderate to High Risk of Clinically Significant AmpC β-lactamase Production.高剂量头孢吡肟与碳青霉烯类药物治疗产临床上显著AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的中高风险肠杆菌科细菌所致菌血症的疗效比较
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 25;10(3):ofad034. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad034. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Effectiveness of third-generation cephalosporins or piperacillin compared with cefepime or carbapenems for severe infections caused by wild-type AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: A multi-centre retrospective propensity-weighted study.三代头孢菌素或哌拉西林与头孢吡肟或碳青霉烯类药物治疗产野生型 AmpC 酶肠杆菌科所致重症感染的疗效比较:一项多中心回顾性倾向评分匹配研究。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2023 Jul;62(1):106809. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2023.106809. Epub 2023 Apr 6.
3
Outcomes of treating AmpC-producing Enterobacterales bacteraemia with carbapenems vs. non-carbapenems.碳青霉烯类与非碳青霉烯类治疗产 AmpC 肠杆菌科血流感染的结局比较。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Feb;55(2):105860. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.105860. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
4
Cefepime versus carbapenems for treatment of AmpC beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections.头孢吡肟与碳青霉烯类药物治疗产AmpCβ-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌血流感染的比较
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Feb;43(2):213-221. doi: 10.1007/s10096-023-04715-5. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
5
Cefepime vs carbapenems for treating third-generation cephalosporin-resistant AmpC β-lactamase-hyperproducing Enterobacterales bloodstream infections: a multicenter retrospective study.头孢吡肟与碳青霉烯类药物治疗第三代头孢菌素耐药、高产 AmpC β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌血流感染的比较:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Int J Infect Dis. 2023 Sep;134:273-279. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
6
Cefepime Therapy for Monomicrobial Enterobacter cloacae Bacteremia: Unfavorable Outcomes in Patients Infected by Cefepime-Susceptible Dose-Dependent Isolates.头孢吡肟治疗单微生物阴沟肠杆菌菌血症:头孢吡肟敏感剂量依赖性菌株感染患者的不良结局
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015 Dec;59(12):7558-63. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01477-15. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
7
Third-generation cephalosporin resistance in clinical isolates of Enterobacterales collected between 2016-2018 from USA and Europe: genotypic analysis of β-lactamases and comparative in vitro activity of cefepime/enmetazobactam.2016-2018 年期间从美国和欧洲收集的肠杆菌科临床分离株中第三代头孢菌素耐药性:β-内酰胺酶的基因分析和头孢吡肟/恩他唑巴坦的体外比较活性。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Jun;25:93-101. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2021.02.031. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
8
Cefepime therapy for monomicrobial bacteremia caused by cefepime-susceptible extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: MIC matters.头孢吡肟治疗产超广谱β-内酰胺酶头孢吡肟敏感肠杆菌科细菌引起的单一细菌菌血症:MIC 很重要。
Clin Infect Dis. 2013 Feb;56(4):488-95. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis916. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
9
Ceftriaxone versus cefepime or carbapenems for definitive treatment of low-risk AmpC-Harboring Enterobacterales bloodstream infections in hospitalized adults: A retrospective cohort study.头孢曲松与头孢吡肟或碳青霉烯类药物治疗住院成人低危携带 AmpC 酶肠杆菌血流感染的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Jan;111(1):116557. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116557. Epub 2024 Oct 13.
10
Carbapenem therapy is associated with improved survival compared with piperacillin-tazobactam for patients with extended-spectrum β-lactamase bacteremia.对于产超广谱β-内酰胺酶菌血症患者,与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦相比,碳青霉烯类治疗与生存率提高相关。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 1;60(9):1319-25. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ003. Epub 2015 Jan 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Cefepime Versus Carbapenem Therapy for the Treatment of Invasive Infections With Inducible Chromosomal AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.头孢吡肟与碳青霉烯类疗法治疗产诱导型染色体AmpC肠杆菌科细菌引起的侵袭性感染:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 14;12(7):ofaf413. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofaf413. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Treated with Carbapenem Versus Non-carbapenem Therapy for AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales Bacteremia: A Retrospective Study.碳青霉烯类与非碳青霉烯类疗法治疗产AmpC肠杆菌属菌血症患者的特征及结局:一项回顾性研究
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 May;14(5):1061-1074. doi: 10.1007/s40121-025-01133-2. Epub 2025 Apr 9.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of therapeutic drug monitoring-based dose optimization of piperacillin/tazobactam on sepsis-related organ dysfunction in patients with sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.基于治疗药物监测的哌拉西林/他唑巴坦剂量优化对脓毒症相关器官功能障碍的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Mar;48(3):311-321. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06609-6. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
2
Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections.美国传染病学会关于治疗产 AmpC β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科、耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌和嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 6;74(12):2089-2114. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab1013.
3
Cefepime versus carbapenem for treating complicated urinary tract infection caused by cefoxitin-nonsusceptible ESCPM organisms: a multicenter, real-world study.
头孢吡肟与碳青霉烯类药物治疗由头孢西丁不敏感的肠杆菌科细菌、葡萄球菌和假单胞菌(ESCPM)引起的复杂性尿路感染:一项多中心、真实世界研究
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10850-5.
4
Piperacillin/tazobactam vs. cefepime or carbapenems for the treatment of bloodstream infections due to bacteria producing chromosomal AmpC beta-lactamase: a systematic review and meta-analysis.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与头孢吡肟或碳青霉烯类药物治疗产染色体AmpCβ-内酰胺酶细菌所致血流感染的系统评价和荟萃分析
Infection. 2024 Dec 4. doi: 10.1007/s15010-024-02447-y.
5
Real-World Experience of Imipenem-Relebactam Treatment as Salvage Therapy in Difficult-to-Treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections (IMRECOR Study).亚胺培南-瑞来巴坦治疗难治性铜绿假单胞菌感染作为挽救疗法的真实世界经验(IMRECOR研究)
Infect Dis Ther. 2025 Jan;14(1):283-292. doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-01077-z. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
6
emergence of resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam through modification of chromosomal AmpC β-lactamase in .通过修饰[具体对象]中的染色体AmpCβ-内酰胺酶而出现对头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的耐药性 。 (注:原文中“in.”后面缺少具体信息)
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 Dec 5;68(12):e0130724. doi: 10.1128/aac.01307-24. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
7
Antibiotic Treatment of Infections Caused by AmpC-Producing Enterobacterales.产AmpC肠杆菌科细菌所致感染的抗生素治疗
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Sep 21;12(5):142. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12050142.
8
Mortality and Risk Factors of Death in Patients with AmpC -Lactamase Producing Bloodstream Infection: A .产AmpC内酰胺酶血流感染患者的死亡率及死亡风险因素:A.
Infect Drug Resist. 2024 Sep 18;17:4023-4035. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S473789. eCollection 2024.
9
Extended-Infusion β-Lactam Therapy, Mortality, and Subsequent Antibiotic Resistance Among Hospitalized Adults With Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections.延长输注β-内酰胺类抗生素治疗与住院革兰氏阴性菌血流感染患者的死亡率和后续抗生素耐药性的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2418234. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18234.
Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing spp, , , spp, or : A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MERINO-2).美罗培南与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦用于产AmpCβ-内酰胺酶的[具体菌名]、[具体菌名]或[具体菌名]所致血流感染的确定性治疗:一项多中心随机对照试验(MERINO-2)
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Aug 2;8(8):ofab387. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab387. eCollection 2021 Aug.
4
PRO: Testing for ESBL production is necessary for ceftriaxone-non-susceptible Enterobacterales: perfect should not be the enemy of progress.专业观点:对于对头孢曲松不敏感的肠杆菌科细菌,检测超广谱β-内酰胺酶的产生是必要的:完美不应成为进步的敌人。
JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021 May 7;3(2):dlab019. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab019. eCollection 2021 Jun.
5
The Pitt Bacteremia Score Predicts Mortality in Nonbacteremic Infections.皮特菌血症评分可预测非菌血症感染的死亡率。
Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Apr 15;70(9):1826-1833. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz528.
6
Inoculum effect of β-lactam antibiotics.β-内酰胺类抗生素的接种效应。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019 Oct 1;74(10):2825-2843. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkz226.
7
AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: what a clinician should know.产 AmpCβ-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科细菌:临床医生须知。
Infection. 2019 Jun;47(3):363-375. doi: 10.1007/s15010-019-01291-9. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
8
A Primer on AmpC β-Lactamases: Necessary Knowledge for an Increasingly Multidrug-resistant World.AmpC β-内酰胺酶入门:应对日益增多的多重耐药问题的必备知识
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 27;69(8):1446-1455. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz173.
9
Impact of carbapenem versus non-carbapenem treatment on the rates of superinfection: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.碳青霉烯类与非碳青霉烯类治疗对二重感染发生率的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2018 Nov;24(11):915-920. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
10
Assessing antimicrobial stewardship initiatives: Clinical evaluation of cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with bloodstream infections secondary to AmpC-producing organisms.评估抗菌药物管理计划:头孢吡肟或哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗产 AmpC 酶菌血流感染的临床评价。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Nov;52(5):719-723. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Aug 17.