Yuanren Gao, Yin Linan, Liu Ruibao, Cui Yali
Department of Interventional, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China.
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 9;13:1054072. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1054072. eCollection 2023.
Lenvatinib combined with programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor has achieved good survival results in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has attracted attention because of its high response rate and favorable survival rate in patients with liver cancer and portal vein tumor thrombus. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Lenvatinib combined with programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor plus transarterial chemoembolization or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.
We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library for studies. These included randomized controlled trials or clinical trials of Lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor plus transarterial chemoembolization or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (intervention group) versus Lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor or Lenvatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization/hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy or Lenvatinib alone (control group) in liver cancer with portal vein tumor thrombus The primary outcomes were overall survival and progression-free time, and the secondary outcomes were response rate and the rate of adverse events. According to the heterogeneity among different studies, Revman5.4 was used to conduct fixed effect or random effect model analysis.
Five clinical trials were included, including 311 cases in the intervention group and 309 cases in the control group. In terms of efficacy, compared with the control group, the overall survival (HR=1.88, 95%CI: 1.57-2.25, P < 0.00001) and progression-free survival (HR=1.62, 95%CI: 1.41-1.86, P < 0.00001), better efficacy, and better disease response than the control group. In terms of safety, the risk of treatment-related adverse events in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group, and White Blood cell count decreased (RR=0.72, 95%CI: 0.38-1.37, P=0.32), Platelet count decreased (RR=0.99, 95%CI: 0.65-1.51, P=0.96) and Total bilirubin increased (RR=0.86, 95%CI: Increased) 0.88-1.28, P=0.46) were lower than those in the control group, and the rest were higher than those in the control group, and the differences in some results were statistically significant.
Transarterial chemoembolization or hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with Lenvatinib plus programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitor can effectively delay the progression, prolong the survival period and improve the quality of life of liver cancer patients with portal vein tumor thrombus.
乐伐替尼联合程序性细胞死亡蛋白1抑制剂在治疗伴有门静脉癌栓的肝细胞癌方面取得了良好的生存效果。经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)或肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)因其对肝癌合并门静脉癌栓患者的高缓解率和良好生存率而受到关注。本研究旨在比较乐伐替尼联合程序性细胞死亡蛋白1抑制剂加经动脉化疗栓塞术或肝动脉灌注化疗在伴有门静脉癌栓的肝细胞癌患者中的疗效和安全性。
我们在PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中检索研究。这些研究包括乐伐替尼加程序性细胞死亡蛋白1抑制剂加经动脉化疗栓塞术或肝动脉灌注化疗(干预组)与乐伐替尼加程序性细胞死亡蛋白1抑制剂或乐伐替尼加经动脉化疗栓塞术/肝动脉灌注化疗或单独使用乐伐替尼(对照组)治疗伴有门静脉癌栓的肝癌的随机对照试验或临床试验。主要结局为总生存期和无进展时间,次要结局为缓解率和不良事件发生率。根据不同研究间的异质性,使用Revman5.4进行固定效应或随机效应模型分析。
纳入5项临床试验,干预组311例,对照组309例。在疗效方面,与对照组相比,总生存期(HR=1.88,95%CI:1.57 - 2.25,P < 0.00001)和无进展生存期(HR=1.62,95%CI:1.41 - 1.86,P < 0.00001),疗效更好,疾病缓解情况优于对照组。在安全性方面,干预组治疗相关不良事件的风险高于对照组,白细胞计数降低(RR=0.72,95%CI:0.38 - 1.37,P=0.32)、血小板计数降低(RR=0.99,95%CI:0.65 - 1.51,P=0.96)和总胆红素升高(RR=0.86,95%CI:0.88 - 1.28,P=0.46)低于对照组,其余高于对照组,部分结果差异有统计学意义。
经动脉化疗栓塞术或肝动脉灌注化疗联合乐伐替尼加程序性细胞死亡蛋白1抑制剂可有效延缓伴有门静脉癌栓的肝癌患者的病情进展,延长生存期,提高生活质量。