Suppr超能文献

经动脉化疗栓塞联合乐伐替尼加PD - 1抑制剂与经动脉化疗栓塞联合乐伐替尼治疗不可切除肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析。

Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib combined with PD-1 inhibitors versus transarterial chemoembolization plus lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chen Yue, Jia Luyao, Li Yu, Cui Wenhao, Wang Jukun, Zhang Chao, Bian Chunjing, Luo Tao

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Emergency Medicine Department, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Immunol. 2024 Aug 30;15:1466113. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1466113. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Locoregional treatment combined with systemic therapy is expected to play a synergistic anticancer role. We conducted this systemic meta-analysis to examine the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib with or without programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (TLP group) compared with TACE + lenvatinib (TL group) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

METHODS

From the inception date to April 2024, the data from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Ovid, Web of Science, and Clinical Trials. gov were used for meta-analysis. All clinical outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs). The hazard ratio (HR) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to measure the pooled effect.

RESULTS

This study included 10 retrospective cohort studies, including 1128 patients. The OS (HR=0.51; 95% CI: 0.43-0.60, 0.05), PFS (HR=0.52; 95% CI: 0.45-0.61, 0.05), ORR (RR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.37-1.83; P < 0.05) and DCR (RR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.20-1.43; P < 0.05) were significantly higher in TLP group than in the TL group. The incidence of AEs was acceptable. Prognostic factor analysis identified that ECOG PS (1/0), Child-Pugh class (B/A), BCLC stage (C/B) and main portal vein invasion (yes/no) were independent prognostic factors for OS. BCLC stage (C/B) and main portal vein invasion (yes/no) were independent prognostic factors for PFS.

CONCLUSION

The TLP group had better efficacy for uHCC than that of the TL group, with acceptable safety.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, identifier (CRD42023420093).

摘要

背景

局部区域治疗联合全身治疗有望发挥协同抗癌作用。我们进行了这项系统评价,以研究经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)联合乐伐替尼加或不加程序性细胞死亡蛋白-1(PD-1)抑制剂(TLP组)与TACE+乐伐替尼(TL组)治疗不可切除肝细胞癌(uHCC)的疗效和安全性。

方法

从起始日期至2024年4月,来自PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、Ovid、Web of Science和ClinicalTrials.gov的数据用于系统评价。所有感兴趣的临床结局包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)和不良事件(AE)。采用危险比(HR)和风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)来衡量合并效应。

结果

本研究纳入了10项回顾性队列研究,共1128例患者。TLP组的OS(HR=0.51;95%CI:0.43-0.60,P<0.05)、PFS(HR=0.52;95%CI:0.45-0.61,P<0.05)、ORR(RR = 1.58;95%CI:1.37-1.83;P < 0.05)和DCR(RR = 1.31;95%CI:1.20-1.43;P < 0.05)均显著高于TL组。AE的发生率是可接受的。预后因素分析确定,东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG PS,1/0)、Child-Pugh分级(B/A)、巴塞罗那临床肝癌(BCLC)分期(C/B)和门静脉主干侵犯(是/否)是OS的独立预后因素。BCLC分期(C/B)和门静脉主干侵犯(是/否)是PFS的独立预后因素。

结论

TLP组治疗uHCC的疗效优于TL组,安全性可接受。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO,标识符(CRD42023420093)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3600/11392794/72cf21332b47/fimmu-15-1466113-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验