Guichard Matthieu, Dainat Benjamin, Dietemann Vincent
Swiss Bee Research Centre Agroscope Bern Switzerland.
Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, UNIL-Sorge University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland.
Evol Appl. 2023 Feb 21;16(3):593-608. doi: 10.1111/eva.13533. eCollection 2023 Mar.
Honey bees, , of European origin are major pollinators of crops and wild flora. Their endemic and exported populations are threatened by a variety of abiotic and biotic factors. Among the latter, the ectoparasitic mite is the most important single cause behind colony mortality. The selection of mite resistance in honey bee populations has been deemed a more sustainable solution to its control than varroacidal treatments. Because natural selection has led to the survival of some European and African honey bee populations to infestations, harnessing its principles has recently been highlighted as a more efficient way to provide honey bee lineages that survive infestations when compared with conventional selection on resistance traits against the parasite. However, the challenges and drawbacks of harnessing natural selection to solve the varroa problem have only been minimally addressed. We argue that failing to consider these issues could lead to counterproductive results, such as increased mite virulence, loss of genetic diversity reducing host resilience, population collapses or poor acceptance by beekeepers. Therefore, it appears timely to evaluate the prospects for the success of such programmes and the qualities of the populations obtained. After reviewing the approaches proposed in the literature and their outcomes, we consider their advantages and drawbacks and propose perspectives to overcome their limitations. In these considerations, we not only reflect on the theoretical aspects of host-parasite relationships but also on the currently largely neglected practical constraints, that is, the requirements for productive beekeeping, conservation or rewilding objectives. To optimize natural selection-based programmes towards these objectives, we suggest designs based on a combination of nature-driven phenotypic differentiation and human-directed selection of traits. Such a dual strategy aims at allowing field-realistic evolutionary approaches towards the survival of infestations and the improvement of honey bee health.
原产于欧洲的蜜蜂是农作物和野生植物的主要传粉者。它们的本地种群和输出种群受到各种非生物和生物因素的威胁。在后者中,外寄生螨是蜂群死亡背后最重要的单一原因。在蜜蜂种群中选择抗螨能力被认为是比使用杀螨剂治疗更可持续的控制方法。由于自然选择导致一些欧洲和非洲蜜蜂种群在受到螨侵害后存活下来,与针对该寄生虫抗性性状的传统选择相比,利用自然选择的原理最近被强调为一种更有效的方法,以提供能在螨侵害中存活的蜜蜂谱系。然而,利用自然选择来解决瓦螨问题的挑战和缺点只是得到了极少的关注。我们认为,不考虑这些问题可能会导致适得其反的结果,如螨毒力增加、遗传多样性丧失导致宿主恢复力下降、种群崩溃或养蜂人接受度低。因此,评估此类计划成功的前景以及所获得种群的质量似乎是适时的。在回顾了文献中提出的方法及其结果后,我们考虑了它们的优缺点,并提出了克服其局限性的观点。在这些思考中,我们不仅反思了宿主 - 寄生虫关系的理论方面,还反思了目前很大程度上被忽视的实际限制,即生产性养蜂、保护或野化目标的要求。为了朝着这些目标优化基于自然选择的计划,我们建议基于自然驱动的表型分化和人为定向选择性状相结合的设计。这样一种双重策略旨在允许采用接近实际情况的进化方法来实现蜜蜂在螨侵害中的存活以及蜜蜂健康状况的改善。