• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在单一教学中心进行保留主动脉瓣根部置换术的25年经验。

Twenty-five year experience with aortic valve-sparing root replacement in a single teaching center.

作者信息

Sromicki Juri, Van Hemelrijck Mathias, Schmiady Martin O, Greutmann Matthias, Bonassin Tempesta Francesca, Mestres Carlos-A, Vogt Paul R, Carrel Thierry P, Holubec Tomáš

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Department of Cardiology, University Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 10;10:1104149. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1104149. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2023.1104149
PMID:36970369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10036903/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Aortic valve-sparing root replacement (AVSRR) is a technically demanding procedure. In experienced centers it offers excellent short- and long-term results, making the procedure an attractive alternative for aortic root replacement especially in young patients. The aim of this study was to analyze long-term results of AVSRR using the David operation in our institution over the last 25 years.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective analysis of outcomes of David operations performed in a teaching institution not running a large AVSRR-program. Pre-, intra- and postoperative data were collected from the institutional electronic medical record system. Follow-up data were collected through direct contact of the patients and their cardiologists/primary care physicians.

RESULTS

Between 02/1996 and 11/2019, 131 patients underwent David operation in our institution by a total of 17 different surgeons. Median age was 48 (33-59), 18% were female. Elective surgery was performed in 89% of the cases, 11% were operated as emergency in the setting of an acute aortic dissection. Connective tissue disease was present in 24% and 26% had a bicuspid aortic valve. At hospital admission 61% had aortic regurgitation grade ≥3, 12% were in functional NYHA-class ≥III. 30-day mortality was 2%, 97% of the patients were discharged with aortic regurgitation ≤2. In 10-year follow-up, 15 (12%) patients had to be re-operated because of root-related complications. Seven patients (47%) received a transcatheter aortic valve implantation, 8 (53%) required surgical replacement of the aortic valve or a Bentall-De Bono operation. Estimated reoperation-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 93.5% ± 2.4% and 87.0% ± 3.5%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed no differences in reoperation-free survival for patients presenting with a bicuspid valve or preoperative aortic regurgitation ≥3. However a preoperative left ventricular end diastolic diameter of ≥5.5 cm was associated with worse outcome.

CONCLUSION

David operations can be performed with excellent perioperative and 10-year follow-up outcomes in centers not running large AVSRR-programs.

摘要

目的

保留主动脉瓣的根部置换术(AVSRR)是一项技术要求很高的手术。在经验丰富的中心,该手术能带来出色的短期和长期效果,使其成为主动脉根部置换术颇具吸引力的替代方案,尤其是对于年轻患者。本研究的目的是分析过去25年里我们机构采用大卫手术进行AVSRR的长期效果。

方法

这是对一家未开展大型AVSRR项目的教学机构中进行的大卫手术结果的单中心回顾性分析。术前、术中和术后数据均从机构电子病历系统中收集。随访数据通过直接联系患者及其心脏病专家/初级保健医生来收集。

结果

1996年2月至2019年11月期间,我们机构共有17位不同的外科医生为131例患者实施了大卫手术。患者中位年龄为48岁(33 - 59岁),女性占18%。89%的病例为择期手术,11%是在急性主动脉夹层情况下作为急诊进行手术。24%的患者存在结缔组织病,26%有二叶式主动脉瓣。入院时,61%的患者主动脉反流分级≥3级,12%的心功能纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级≥III级。30天死亡率为2%,97%的患者出院时主动脉反流≤2级。在10年随访中,15例(12%)患者因根部相关并发症需要再次手术。7例(47%)患者接受了经导管主动脉瓣植入术,8例(53%)需要进行主动脉瓣手术置换或Bentall-De Bono手术。5年和10年的无再次手术生存率估计分别为93.5%±2.4%和87.0%±3.5%。亚组分析显示,二叶式瓣膜患者或术前主动脉反流≥3级的患者在无再次手术生存率方面无差异。然而,术前左心室舒张末期直径≥5.5 cm与较差的预后相关。

结论

在未开展大型AVSRR项目的中心,大卫手术可取得出色的围手术期和10年随访结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c644/10036903/3ff6efd59aa6/fcvm-10-1104149-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c644/10036903/10a02219039b/fcvm-10-1104149-I001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c644/10036903/abfd442ac0a2/fcvm-10-1104149-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c644/10036903/538662c3d556/fcvm-10-1104149-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c644/10036903/0fae4cd3f0cf/fcvm-10-1104149-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c644/10036903/618a0e091fa0/fcvm-10-1104149-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c644/10036903/3ff6efd59aa6/fcvm-10-1104149-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c644/10036903/10a02219039b/fcvm-10-1104149-I001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c644/10036903/abfd442ac0a2/fcvm-10-1104149-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c644/10036903/538662c3d556/fcvm-10-1104149-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c644/10036903/0fae4cd3f0cf/fcvm-10-1104149-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c644/10036903/618a0e091fa0/fcvm-10-1104149-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c644/10036903/3ff6efd59aa6/fcvm-10-1104149-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Twenty-five year experience with aortic valve-sparing root replacement in a single teaching center.在单一教学中心进行保留主动脉瓣根部置换术的25年经验。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Mar 10;10:1104149. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1104149. eCollection 2023.
2
Aortic valve-sparing root replacement with Tirone E. David's reimplantation technique: single-centre 25-year experience.保留主动脉瓣根部的主动脉瓣替换术采用 Tirone E. David 的再植入技术:单中心 25 年经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep 11;60(3):642-648. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab136.
3
Early and Late Results After David vs Bentall Procedure: A Propensity Matched Analysis.David 与 Bentall 手术后的早期和晚期结果:倾向匹配分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Jul;110(1):120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.10.020. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
4
[Surgical treatment of aortic root aneurysm: comparison of Bentall procedure and David reimplantation of aortic valve].[主动脉根部瘤的外科治疗:Bentall手术与David主动脉瓣再植入术的比较]
Vnitr Lek. 2017 Fall;63(10):640-645.
5
Valve-sparing aortic root replacement in adult patients previously operated for congenital heart defects: an initial experience.曾接受先天性心脏缺陷手术的成年患者的保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术:初步经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Jul;50(1):155-9. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv446. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
6
Is aortic valve-sparing root reimplantation (David-I) justified in cardiac redo surgery?在心脏再次手术中,主动脉瓣环保留的根部再植入术(David-I)是否合理?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jun 15;35(1). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivac058.
7
David valve-sparing aortic root replacement: equivalent mid-term outcome for different valve types with or without connective tissue disorder.David 保留主动脉瓣的主动脉根部替换术:不同类型瓣膜在伴有或不伴有结缔组织疾病患者中的中期结果相当。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Jan;145(1):117-26, 127.e1-5; discussion 126-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.09.013. Epub 2012 Oct 17.
8
David I reimplantation procedure for aortic root replacement in Marfan patients: medium-term outcome.大卫I型法用于马凡综合征患者主动脉根部置换的再植入手术:中期结果。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Nov;19(5):743-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu244. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
9
Long-term experience of the modified David V re-implantation technique for valve-sparing aortic root replacement.保留瓣膜主动脉根部置换术改良David V再植入技术的长期经验。
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2023 Jun 1;34:1-8. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2023-018.
10
[Early outcome of valve sparing aortic root replacement with partial upper sternotomy].
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2021 Oct 1;59(10):861-866. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20201117-00799.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Long-Term Outcomes in Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Reimplantation: Full Sternotomy versus Mini-Sternotomy Approach.保留瓣膜主动脉根部再植入术长期疗效的比较分析:全胸骨切开术与微创胸骨切开术入路
J Clin Med. 2024 May 3;13(9):2692. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092692.

本文引用的文献

1
Valve-sparing David procedure minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome.保留瓣膜的David手术微创入路不影响手术效果。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 14;9:966126. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.966126. eCollection 2022.
2
Left ventricle reverse remodeling in chronic aortic regurgitation patients with dilated ventricle after aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后左心室扩张的慢性主动脉瓣反流患者的左心室逆重构。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Jan 16;17(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01754-5.
3
2021 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease.
2021年欧洲心脏病学会/欧洲心胸外科学会瓣膜性心脏病管理指南。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 12;43(7):561-632. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab395.
4
Aortic valve-sparing root replacement with Tirone E. David's reimplantation technique: single-centre 25-year experience.保留主动脉瓣根部的主动脉瓣替换术采用 Tirone E. David 的再植入技术:单中心 25 年经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Sep 11;60(3):642-648. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab136.
5
Aortic valve-sparing root replacement (David): learning curve and impact on outcome.保留主动脉瓣的根部置换术(大卫手术):学习曲线及对手术结果的影响
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 May 1;30(5):754-761. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivz324.
6
Aortic Valve-Sparing Root Replacement (David I Procedure) in Adolescents: Long-Term Outcome.青少年保留主动脉瓣根部替换术(David I 术式):长期结果。
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Jun;69(4):308-313. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693654. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
7
Variability of repairable bicuspid aortic valve phenotypes: towards an anatomical and repair-oriented classification.可修复性二叶式主动脉瓣表型的变异性:迈向解剖学和修复导向型分类
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Feb 20. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz033.
8
Long-term experience with valve-sparing reimplantation technique for the treatment of aortic aneurysm and aortic regurgitation.主动脉瘤和主动脉瓣反流的保留瓣膜再植入技术的长期经验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;158(1):14-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.155. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
9
Outcomes of valve-sparing root replacement in acute Type A aortic dissection.急性 A 型主动脉夹层保留瓣膜的根部置换术的结果。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 May 1;53(5):1021-1026. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx463.
10
Successful Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Valve Regurgitation Following a David I Valve-Sparing Procedure.大卫I型保留瓣膜手术后继发严重主动脉瓣反流的成功经导管主动脉瓣置换术
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 12;10(11):e101-e103. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.03.035. Epub 2017 May 17.