Zhang Xiang, Yang Yi, Shen Yi-Wei, Zhang Ke-Rui, Ma Li-Tai, Ding Chen, Wang Bei-Yu, Meng Yang, Liu Hao
Department of Orthopedics, Orthopedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Mar 8;11:931202. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.931202. eCollection 2023.
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is widely accepted as the gold standard surgical procedure for treating cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. However, there is concern about the low fusion rate in the early period after ACDF surgery using the Zero-P fusion cage. We creatively designed an assembled uncoupled joint fusion device to improve the fusion rate and solve the implantation difficulties. This study aimed to assess the biomechanical performance of the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage in single-level ACDF and compare it with the Zero-P device. A three-dimensional finite element (FE) of a healthy cervical spine (C2-C7) was constructed and validated. In the one-level surgery model, either an assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage or a zero-profile device was implanted at the C5-C6 segment of the model. A pure moment of 1.0 Nm combined with a follower load of 75 N was imposed at C2 to determine flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. The segmental range of motion (ROM), facet contact force (FCF), maximum intradiscal pressure (IDP), and screw-bone stress were determined and compared with those of the zero-profile device. The results showed that the ROMs of the fused levels in both models were nearly zero, while the motions of the unfused segments were unevenly increased. The FCF at adjacent segments in the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage group was less than that that of the Zero-P group. The IDP at the adjacent segments and screw-bone stress were slightly higher in the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage group than in those of the Zero-P group. Stress on the cage was mainly concentrated on both sides of the wings, reaching 13.4-20.4 Mpa in the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage group. The assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage provided strong immobilization, similar to the Zero-P device. When compared with the Zero-P group, the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage achieved similar resultant values regarding FCF, IDP, and screw-bone stress. Moreover, the assembled uncovertebral joint fusion cage effectively achieved early bone formation and fusion, probably due to proper stress distributions in the wings of both sides.
颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)被广泛认为是治疗神经根型颈椎病和脊髓型颈椎病的金标准手术方法。然而,人们担心使用Zero-P融合器进行ACDF手术后早期融合率较低。我们创新性地设计了一种组装式非耦合关节融合装置,以提高融合率并解决植入困难问题。本研究旨在评估单节段ACDF中组装式钩椎关节融合器的生物力学性能,并将其与Zero-P装置进行比较。构建并验证了健康颈椎(C2-C7)的三维有限元(FE)模型。在单节段手术模型中,在模型的C5-C6节段植入组装式钩椎关节融合器或Zero-P装置。在C2施加1.0 Nm的纯力矩并结合75 N的跟随载荷,以确定屈伸、侧屈和轴向旋转。确定节段活动度(ROM)、小关节接触力(FCF)、最大椎间盘内压力(IDP)和螺钉-骨应力,并与Zero-P装置进行比较。结果表明,两个模型中融合节段的ROM几乎为零,而未融合节段的活动度不均匀增加。组装式钩椎关节融合器组相邻节段的FCF低于Zero-P组。组装式钩椎关节融合器组相邻节段的IDP和螺钉-骨应力略高于Zero-P组。融合器上的应力主要集中在翼的两侧,组装式钩椎关节融合器组达到13.4-20.4 Mpa。组装式钩椎关节融合器提供了强大的固定作用,与Zero-P装置相似。与Zero-P组相比,组装式钩椎关节融合器在FCF、IDP和螺钉-骨应力方面获得了相似的结果值。此外,组装式钩椎关节融合器有效地实现了早期骨形成和融合,可能是由于两侧翼部应力分布适当。