• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于优化治疗方案和最优策略设计的加权稀疏决策树的快速优化

Fast Optimization of Weighted Sparse Decision Trees for use in Optimal Treatment Regimes and Optimal Policy Design.

作者信息

Behrouz Ali, Lécuyer Mathias, Rudin Cynthia, Seltzer Margo

机构信息

University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Duke University Durham, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

CEUR Workshop Proc. 2022 Oct;3318.

PMID:36970634
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10039433/
Abstract

Sparse decision trees are one of the most common forms of interpretable models. While recent advances have produced algorithms that fully optimize sparse decision trees for , that work does not address , because the algorithms cannot handle weighted data samples. Specifically, they rely on the discreteness of the loss function, which means that real-valued weights cannot be directly used. For example, none of the existing techniques produce policies that incorporate inverse propensity weighting on individual data points. We present three algorithms for efficient sparse weighted decision tree optimization. The first approach directly optimizes the weighted loss function; however, it tends to be computationally inefficient for large datasets. Our second approach, which scales more efficiently, transforms weights to integer values and uses data duplication to transform the weighted decision tree optimization problem into an unweighted (but larger) counterpart. Our third algorithm, which scales to much larger datasets, uses a randomized procedure that samples each data point with a probability proportional to its weight. We present theoretical bounds on the error of the two fast methods and show experimentally that these methods can be two orders of magnitude faster than the direct optimization of the weighted loss, without losing significant accuracy.

摘要

稀疏决策树是可解释模型最常见的形式之一。虽然最近的进展产生了一些算法,这些算法可以针对[具体目标]对稀疏决策树进行完全优化,但这项工作并未解决[具体问题],因为这些算法无法处理加权数据样本。具体来说,它们依赖于损失函数的离散性,这意味着不能直接使用实值权重。例如,现有的技术都没有产生能在单个数据点上纳入逆倾向加权的策略。我们提出了三种用于高效稀疏加权决策树优化的算法。第一种方法直接优化加权损失函数;然而,对于大型数据集,它在计算上往往效率低下。我们的第二种方法扩展效率更高,它将权重转换为整数值,并使用数据复制将加权决策树优化问题转化为一个无加权(但更大)的对应问题。我们的第三种算法可以扩展到更大的数据集,它使用一种随机过程,以与其权重成比例的概率对每个数据点进行采样。我们给出了两种快速方法误差的理论界限,并通过实验表明,这些方法比直接优化加权损失快两个数量级,且不会损失显著的准确性。

相似文献

1
Fast Optimization of Weighted Sparse Decision Trees for use in Optimal Treatment Regimes and Optimal Policy Design.用于优化治疗方案和最优策略设计的加权稀疏决策树的快速优化
CEUR Workshop Proc. 2022 Oct;3318.
2
Fast Sparse Decision Tree Optimization via Reference Ensembles.通过参考集成实现快速稀疏决策树优化
Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2022;36(9):9604-9613. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v36i9.21194. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
3
A novel approach to build accurate and diverse decision tree forest.一种构建准确且多样的决策树森林的新方法。
Evol Intell. 2022;15(1):439-453. doi: 10.1007/s12065-020-00519-0. Epub 2021 Jan 3.
4
Accountable survival contrast-learning for optimal dynamic treatment regimes.有责任的生存对比学习用于最优动态治疗方案。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 8;13(1):2250. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29106-w.
5
C-learning: A new classification framework to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes.C学习法:一种用于估计最优动态治疗方案的新分类框架。
Biometrics. 2018 Sep;74(3):891-899. doi: 10.1111/biom.12836. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
6
Treed Gaussian Process Regression for Solving Offline Data-Driven Continuous Multiobjective Optimization Problems.树状高斯过程回归求解离线数据驱动的连续多目标优化问题。
Evol Comput. 2023 Dec 1;31(4):375-399. doi: 10.1162/evco_a_00329.
7
Optimal Sparse Regression Trees.最优稀疏回归树
Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2023 Jun;37(9):11270-11279. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v37i9.26334.
8
Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.调强放射治疗中射束几何形状与强度图的同步优化
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jan 1;64(1):301-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.08.023. Epub 2005 Nov 14.
9
EDST: a decision stump based ensemble algorithm for synergistic drug combination prediction.EDST:基于决策树桩的协同药物组合预测集成算法。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2023 Aug 29;24(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s12859-023-05453-3.
10
Piece-wise quadratic approximations of arbitrary error functions for fast and robust machine learning.分段二次逼近任意误差函数,实现快速稳健的机器学习。
Neural Netw. 2016 Dec;84:28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring the Whole Rashomon Set of Sparse Decision Trees.探索稀疏决策树的完整罗生门集
Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2022;35:14071-14084.
2
Fast Sparse Decision Tree Optimization via Reference Ensembles.通过参考集成实现快速稀疏决策树优化
Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell. 2022;36(9):9604-9613. doi: 10.1609/aaai.v36i9.21194. Epub 2022 Jun 28.
3
Toward Interpretable-AI Policies Using Evolutionary Nonlinear Decision Trees for Discrete-Action Systems.使用进化非线性决策树实现离散动作系统的可解释人工智能策略。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2024 Jan;54(1):50-62. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2022.3180664. Epub 2023 Dec 20.
4
An Algorithm for Generating Individualized Treatment Decision Trees and Random Forests.一种生成个性化治疗决策树和随机森林的算法。
J Comput Graph Stat. 2018;27(4):849-860. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2018.1451337. Epub 2018 Jun 14.
5
Tree based weighted learning for estimating individualized treatment rules with censored data.基于树的加权学习方法用于估计含删失数据的个体化治疗规则
Electron J Stat. 2017;11(2):3927-3953. doi: 10.1214/17-EJS1305. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
6
Estimating causal effects for survival (time-to-event) outcomes by combining classification tree analysis and propensity score weighting.通过结合分类树分析和倾向得分加权来估计生存(事件发生时间)结局的因果效应。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Apr;24(2):380-387. doi: 10.1111/jep.12859. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
7
Tree-based methods for individualized treatment regimes.用于个性化治疗方案的基于树的方法。
Biometrika. 2015;102(3):501-514. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asv028. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
8
Using decision lists to construct interpretable and parsimonious treatment regimes.使用决策列表构建可解释且简洁的治疗方案。
Biometrics. 2015 Dec;71(4):895-904. doi: 10.1111/biom.12354. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
9
Impact of HbA1c measurement on hospital readmission rates: analysis of 70,000 clinical database patient records.糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)检测对医院再入院率的影响:对70000份临床数据库患者记录的分析
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:781670. doi: 10.1155/2014/781670. Epub 2014 Apr 3.